You can enjoy a 15% early bird price until 31st August. Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series: https://lnkd.in/e2REnX63
We are all Futurists and we all do Foresight!!! We think about the future constantly — automatically, intuitively, mostly by assumption. In Kahneman's terms, System 1. What we call Futures and Foresight is the System 2 version: deliberate, structured, designed exploration of the future. Which is why "Futurist" is such a difficult word. A Futurist is not someone who thinks about the future. Nor is it a domain expert extrapolating their own field — being excellent on the future of energy, or of AI, doesn't make you a futurist. It is someone working in that System 2 mode with the field's own apparatus: vocabulary, principles, concepts, tools and methods, applied properly and built into frameworks of their own. This is a discipline with layers: principles, foundations, concepts, tools, methods, frameworks and more. You can enter at one layer and move through others; you don't need every layer to be useful or relevant. Whether you end up calling yourself a futurist is a different conversation. The border is hard to police for another reason: Foresight only becomes actionable combined with something else. "Strategic Foresight" is already a compound — Foresight with Strategy, with Innovation, sometimes with Entrepreneurship. We explore the future in order to decide and to act. So we work in a constellation: Foresight plus strategy, innovation, entrepreneurship, design thinking. That gives a sharper critique of corporate "Futurist" appointments than the usual one. The problem isn't that the person hired lacks the title. It is that these roles hire one half of the constellation — domain depth, policy fluency, strategic instinct — and assume the Foresight half arrives with it. Our own community sometimes makes the mirror mistake: it develops the foresight half beautifully, stays disconnected from strategy, innovation and design. Now about the OpenAI's new "AI futures blog" and "strategic futures team". A frontier lab has understood, correctly, that the future of AI is too uncertain and too fast to be planned in the usual way, and needs an organised way of exploring it. They don't have the vocabulary for what they identified, so they invented an adjacent one. They, and also Anthropic, know something they cannot yet verbalise. I read that as a demand signal. The range of organisations now opening these roles is positive - The Coca-Cola Company, McDonald's , Apple, SoftBank Group Corp. , UNICEF , Intuit, H&M , the LEGO Group - but it can be a phase. What is not a phase is the underlying need: the future cannot be predicted, and there is no other organised way to explore it. Whether these roles become practice or evaporate as hype will depend far less on who holds the titles than on whether the work reaches decisions. * Reflection based on comments on my Linkedin post "Futurists Wanted". Learn Futures & Foresight with me in the 5th edition of the Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series: https://lnkd.in/eiAbk9yj