Foto de capa de IF Insight & Foresight
IF Insight & Foresight

IF Insight & Foresight

Atividades de consultoria em gestão empresarial

Lisbon, Lisbon 2.848 seguidores

We want to be the most exciting company in blending futures, strategy and innovation!

Sobre nós

IF Insight & Foresight it’s a futures think tank and a consulting studio that blends Foresight, Strategy and Innovation in order to create lasting value and meaningful experiences for people and organizations. We design and implement processes and experiences that allow organizations to better understand the past, improve their decision-making in the present and embrace their preferred future. Scanning for Trends, Weak Signals, Uncertainties or Wild Cards are ways of making sense of change and a powerful ignition for identifying, structuring and understanding changes in the business and global environments. We strongly believe that we can improve the competitive positioning of organizations and use these as inputs to identify new growth opportunities, foster strategic agility, and design innovation strategies and projects.

Setor
Atividades de consultoria em gestão empresarial
Tamanho da empresa
2-10 funcionários
Sede
Lisbon, Lisbon
Tipo
Empresa privada
Fundada em
2019
Especializações
innovation, strategy, foresight, scenrios, trends e futures

Localidades

Funcionários da IF Insight & Foresight

Atualizações

  • You can enjoy a 15% early bird price until 31st August. Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series: https://lnkd.in/e2REnX63

    We are all Futurists and we all do Foresight!!! We think about the future constantly — automatically, intuitively, mostly by assumption. In Kahneman's terms, System 1. What we call Futures and Foresight is the System 2 version: deliberate, structured, designed exploration of the future. Which is why "Futurist" is such a difficult word. A Futurist is not someone who thinks about the future. Nor is it a domain expert extrapolating their own field — being excellent on the future of energy, or of AI, doesn't make you a futurist. It is someone working in that System 2 mode with the field's own apparatus: vocabulary, principles, concepts, tools and methods, applied properly and built into frameworks of their own. This is a discipline with layers: principles, foundations, concepts, tools, methods, frameworks and more. You can enter at one layer and move through others; you don't need every layer to be useful or relevant. Whether you end up calling yourself a futurist is a different conversation. The border is hard to police for another reason: Foresight only becomes actionable combined with something else. "Strategic Foresight" is already a compound — Foresight with Strategy, with Innovation, sometimes with Entrepreneurship. We explore the future in order to decide and to act. So we work in a constellation: Foresight plus strategy, innovation, entrepreneurship, design thinking. That gives a sharper critique of corporate "Futurist" appointments than the usual one. The problem isn't that the person hired lacks the title. It is that these roles hire one half of the constellation — domain depth, policy fluency, strategic instinct — and assume the Foresight half arrives with it. Our own community sometimes makes the mirror mistake: it develops the foresight half beautifully, stays disconnected from strategy, innovation and design. Now about the OpenAI's new "AI futures blog" and "strategic futures team". A frontier lab has understood, correctly, that the future of AI is too uncertain and too fast to be planned in the usual way, and needs an organised way of exploring it. They don't have the vocabulary for what they identified, so they invented an adjacent one. They, and also Anthropic, know something they cannot yet verbalise. I read that as a demand signal. The range of organisations now opening these roles is positive - The Coca-Cola Company, McDonald's , Apple, SoftBank Group Corp. , UNICEF , Intuit, H&M , the LEGO Group - but it can be a phase. What is not a phase is the underlying need: the future cannot be predicted, and there is no other organised way to explore it. Whether these roles become practice or evaporate as hype will depend far less on who holds the titles than on whether the work reaches decisions. * Reflection based on comments on my Linkedin post "Futurists Wanted". Learn Futures & Foresight with me in the 5th edition of the Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series: https://lnkd.in/eiAbk9yj

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    My Whole Library, for Subscribers A short note about how my Substack publications works from now on. The Insight & Foresight Brief stays free. Every Friday, to everyone, permanently. Six signals, the two edges, and the reasoning behind both. That is not changing, and it is not going to change later either. What changes is what a subscription gives you. Paid subscribers now have access to every essay in the library — everything published so far, and everything that comes next. What is in there. Around 40 essays, and they are not a pile of posts. They form multiple bodies of work. - The scanning series — why scanning is not keeping up with the news, what actually counts as a weak signal, and how sensing differs from collecting. - The Scanning · Sensing · Acting series, including the Acting-stage pieces on the hardest part of this work — turning anticipation into commitments an organisation actually honours. - How Foresight is strongly connected with strategy, innovation and entrepreneurship. - The Future-Ready Leadership Framework, in three parts, with the assumptions underneath it. - The Future of Work trilogy, with the capability stack and the five-dimensional world. Read in order, they are closer to a course than to an archive. That is what a subscription now opens. If you already pay: thank you. This is what you have been funding, and the library is now open to you in full. If you read for free: you lose nothing you currently receive. The Friday Brief lands as it always has, and some articles will cotinue to be published to all subscribers. Access my Substack here: https://lnkd.in/e_3rXZCg

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    The number and diversity of foresight job postings is growing exponentially. Just in the last weeks: Apple. H&M Group. Arup. Kearney. Scotiabank. Cushman & Wakefield. PwC Japan. Capgemini's frog, among other companies UNICEF. UNOPS. The Singapore public service. The Dubai government. The Austrian Institute of Technology. Even OpenAI announced yesterday a Strategic Foresight team and a AI Futures blog But the volume isn't the signal. This is: Junior Foresight Specialist. Junior Business Foresight Analyst. Insight Analyst. Senior Strategist. Programme Lead. Director of Partnerships and Futures. Read those job descriptions and you'll notice they aren't buying opinions about the future. They're buying delivery: programme, process, embed, capability. So if you want this work, here's what you actually need to learn — four layers, cumulative, in order: 1. Futures literacy. The principles and the vocabulary to think and act on the future. Without it you'll spend every workshop arguing about words instead of about the future. 2. The objects of change. Megatrends, trends, weak signals, wildcards, uncertainties — and how to tell them apart holding real evidence, not textbook examples. Calling something a weak signal doesn't make it one. And uncertainties are the ones most often skipped: scenarios are built on uncertainties, not on trends. A set of scenarios assembled from trends is one future wearing four hats. 3. Tools and methods. Scanning, scenarios, cross-impact, backcasting, wind-tunnelling. Used, badly at first, with feedback. No shortcut here. 4. Frameworks. How to design and run a whole foresight process inside a real organisation — for innovation, strategy, marketing, policy. This is what makes you employable at programme level. Most people stop after one or two. That's why the gap between "interested in the future" and "hired to work on it" stays wide. I built the Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series (SFMS) around these four layers, in this order. SFMS 5th edition: five Thursdays, 1–29 October, live online. 15% early rate until 31 August — Core €148.75, PRO €297.50. Programme and enrolment: https://lnkd.in/eiAbk9yj If the field has finally opened up — and it has — the people who get those jobs will be the ones who spend this autumn learning to do the work, not reading about it.

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • The new edition of the Insight & Foresight Brief is live!

    Pew put a measured number on how much of the open web is written with AI. It replaces an estimate that circulated for two years with no sampling frame behind it. Cited confidently in strategy decks. Including some of mine. Two more landed in the same week. Nature reports that roughly nine in ten recent biomedical papers carry signatures of AI assistance. MIT Technology Review sets out how little is actually known about real-world AI use — because adoption statistics rest on self-report, vendor telemetry and licence counts, not on observing what people do. Read separately: three interesting findings. Read together: the evidence base that scanning practices stand on has changed underneath them, and the change is not visible from inside any single source. Six signals in this week's Brief, including why the interconnection queue and not the chip is now the ceiling on AI. Source discipline is the first thing we work through in the Strategic Foresight Masterclass Series, 5th edition — live online, five Thursdays from 1 October. The 15% early rate runs until 31 August: Core €148.75, PRO €297.50.

  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    The 5th edition of the Strategic Foresight Masterclass opens on 1 October. The 20% early rate closes today, 15 August. Five live sessions, five Thursdays — 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 October, 12:00–14:00 London. Ten hours of working through the craft rather than watching slides about it: the foundations of foresight, the core concepts and frameworks, hands-on methods for mapping change, scenario building, and a final applied Scanning · Sensing · Acting lab run inside ORION.AI. Two ways in: Core — €175, now €140. The five sessions, the decks, templates and frameworks, recordings, reading list, certificate. PRO — €350, now €280. Everything in Core, plus a full year inside Futures.360 as founding-member access, three months of ORION Pro, and a 1:1 mentoring session after the third week. The 20% applies automatically at checkout — no code to remember. After today the prices return to €175 and €350. Five sessions, one cohort, six weeks from now. https://lnkd.in/e2FusvhP

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    The 5th edition of the Strategic Foresight Masterclass opens on 1 October. The 20% early rate closes today, 15 August. Five live sessions, five Thursdays — 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29 October, 12:00–14:00 London. Ten hours of working through the craft rather than watching slides about it: the foundations of foresight, the core concepts and frameworks, hands-on methods for mapping change, scenario building, and a final applied Scanning · Sensing · Acting lab run inside ORION.AI. Two ways in: Core — €175, now €140. The five sessions, the decks, templates and frameworks, recordings, reading list, certificate. PRO — €350, now €280. Everything in Core, plus a full year inside Futures.360 as founding-member access, three months of ORION Pro, and a 1:1 mentoring session after the third week. The 20% applies automatically at checkout — no code to remember. After today the prices return to €175 and €350. Five sessions, one cohort, six weeks from now. https://lnkd.in/e2FusvhP

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • The new Insight & Foresight Brief is out! Four things went wrong last week. In every one, the dangerous thing had not changed. An AI agent at the UK's AI Security Institute talked a real open source maintainer toward approving malicious code, unprompted, and the sandbox turned out to be open to the internet. Stanford and Arc generated whole viral genomes, and DNA screening was built for genes. Wildfires now burn long enough to set off WWII bombs that every register had closed. The Amazon holds to 4 degrees of warming, but only while it is whole. Risk registers hold objects. What moves is the assumption holding the object in place, and an assumption has no row, no owner and no review date. Look at your own register. Which line on it is safe only because of something nobody wrote down? Six signals and the two edges between them are in the edition below, along with this week's larger piece: the AI Scanning Deep Dive. 815 forces resolved to 57, then sorted into twelve Strategic Spaces, because the 57 are the smaller half and a list has no interior. Free to read, 58 pages, no gate. https://lnkd.in/eNXy88GZ

  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    Four things went wrong last week. In every one, the dangerous thing had not changed. An AI agent at the UK's AI Security Institute talked a real open source maintainer toward approving malicious code, unprompted, and the sandbox turned out to be open to the internet. Stanford and Arc generated whole viral genomes, and DNA screening was built for genes. Wildfires now burn long enough to set off WWII bombs that every register had closed. The Amazon holds to 4 degrees of warming, but only while it is whole. Risk registers hold objects. What moves is the assumption holding the object in place, and an assumption has no row, no owner and no review date. Look at your own register. Which line on it is safe only because of something nobody wrote down? Six signals and the two edges between them are in the edition below, along with this week's larger piece: the AI Scanning Deep Dive. 815 forces resolved to 57, then sorted into twelve Strategic Spaces, because the 57 are the smaller half and a list has no interior. Free to read, 58 pages, no gate.

  • For anyone who wants the version with the working shown — 57 driving forces, how they were clustered into these twelve, and where the evidence came from: www.ifforesight.com (click on the banner on the top)

    Twelve circles, and the lines between them. Here is how to read it without knowing anything about artificial intelligence. Most explanations of AI are explanations of the technology. This map is not about the technology. It is about everything the technology now touches, and how those parts pull on each other. Read it as a working machine with four jobs. Something has to generate the power. That is the capability engine — how capable the machines become, and how cheap that capability gets. In 2026 the second question moves faster than the first. Something has to hold it up. Intelligence is not weightless: it runs on chips, buildings, water and electricity, built somewhere specific, next to someone's town. That is where AI stops being a topic and starts being an electricity bill and a planning decision. Something sets the price, and so decides who can afford to take part at all — countries as much as companies. And something sets the rules: governments, courts, standards bodies. In 2026 that part swings back and forth rather than tightening steadily, which is harder to plan around than either strict rules or none. The other eight circles are where all of this lands on people. Software that acts on its own rather than advising. Jobs that change shape, and the first rung that quietly disappears. Machines that move into physical space. Science and medicine accelerating. Whether you can still believe what you see. What we become to each other. Who holds power globally. And, underneath everything, whether people decide this was worth it. Now the part that the picture is really for: the lines. A data centre gets approved in a town. Electricity prices move. So does local politics. National rules follow, months later. What a company is allowed to build changes. One decision, four circles, and none of the people involved were in the same conversation. That is why this is drawn as a system and not as a list. A list of twelve topics tells you what to worry about. Only the lines tell you what happens next. So the useful question is not whether you are following AI, or whether you have heard of any single topic on this map. Almost everyone has by now, and on its own that changes very little. The question is whether you have something to think with. A map like this is not a summary of what is happening — it is a frame you can put your own situation inside and work forward from. If this part moves, what does it reach next? What would that mean for us, and how much time would we have to respond? Asked once, that is an interesting conversation. Asked routinely, it is most of the difference between an organisation that reacts to what has already happened and one that was preparing for it while it was still forming. The full report with the map, and the evidence under it, is free: https://lnkd.in/ePKVVBXy #StrategicForesight #ArtificialIntelligence #Strategy

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem
  • IF Insight & Foresight compartilhou isso

    Artificial Intelligence - A Scanning Deep Dive In June we published a scan of the AI landscape. Ten weeks later, three of its ten weak signals had become trends and one of its five wildcards was in its second act. Measured against our own previous scan of the same subject: the interval between publishing a weak signal and confirming it as a trend ran to roughly six to seven weeks, across three separate forces. This edition is not a new edition of a document. It supersedes the June scan, ten weeks apart, and the changes are structural rather than cosmetic — the argument demonstrated rather than asserted. But here is the part I care about most. The radar is the smaller half. 57 forces sorted by type is useful. It is also a list, and nothing in a list tells you what happens when one item moves. What turns a scan into intelligence is clustering those forces into 12 Strategic Spaces and drawing the relations between them. At that point I would stop reading them as categories and start reading them as arenas: fields of play with occupants, rules, stakes, and a state that changes. Read whole, the AI System has one source, one floor, one price, one control — and eight nodes that transmit, embody and give it meaning. ▪️ Source — the Capability Engine sets the tempo. That question has split in two: how fast capability advances, and how fast it becomes cheap. The second is moving faster. ▪️ Floor — the Physical Substrate. Its constraint used to be physical. It is now political. ▪️ Price — Capital & the Price of Intelligence. When abundance and fragility come from the same expectations, the failure mode is financial before it is technical. ▪️ Control — the Steering System oscillates rather than ratchets. Change rarely stays in one node. When something new arrives, the useful question is not which space it belongs to, but which two spaces it will reach next. One question, if you have a minute: which of the twelve arenas is your organisation exposed to without operating in? That is usually where the next surprise comes from. Ross Dawson Amy Webb Futurist Jim Carroll Sohail Inayatullah and Dr Craig Wing — curious whether the arena reading holds up against how you each work the system view. The full the report is free to read at www.ifforesight.com. There is a 58-page PDF as well. #StrategicForesight #ArtificialIntelligence #Strategy

    • Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem

Páginas semelhantes