Ask a question about this section
Ask a question about this section
Ask a question about this section
Ask a question about this section
0

The holotype and only known skull of Ko. prima is horribly overprepared; I don't think the former presence of lateral-line grooves can be determined.

Bulanov VV. 2003. Evolution and systematics of seymouriamorph parareptiles. Paleontological Journal 37:S1–S105.

Thanks for alerting me of Bulanov (2002), by the way; that's a reference I had overlooked!

read more, vote or answer

waiting for moderation
Ask a question about this section
Ask a question about this section

Postcranial anatomy and histology of Seymouria, and the terrestriality of seymouriamorphs

View article
Paleontology and Evolutionary Science

Main article text

 

Introduction

Seymouriamorphs are among the best-known stem amniotes (but see Marjanović & Laurin, 2019 for alternative phylogenetic placement) and are known primarily from Lower Permian deposits in North America, Europe, and Russia (Broili, 1904; Amalitzky, 1921; White, 1939; Vaughn, 1966; Berman, Reisz & Eberth, 1987; Berman & Martens, 1993; Sullivan & Reisz, 1999; Bulanov, 2014). Within seymouriamorphs, only the monotypic family Seymouriidae is known from both North America and Eurasia (Broili, 1904; White, 1939; Vaughn, 1966; Berman & Martens, 1993). Of the North American localities, the materials of Seymouria with the greatest detail of preservation are known from the Dolese Brothers Limestone Quarry near Richards Spur, Oklahoma (Sullivan & Reisz, 1999; Bazzana et al., 2020). However, the only previously described postcranial material from this locality consists of a few isolated elements (Sullivan & Reisz, 1999). Furthermore, the most detailed description and figuring of the postcrania of Seymouria from any locality is that completed by White (1939). Subsequent authors have provided focused descriptions of the atlas-axis complex (Berman, Reisz & Eberth, 1987; Sumida, Lombard & Berman, 1992) and the manus and pes (Berman et al., 2000), but White’s (1939) work remains the most thorough description of the postcranial skeleton in its entirety. While the interpretations made by White (1939) have been largely supported, or at least not overturned, by subsequent authors, his illustrations were unlabelled, somewhat stylized, and from slightly angled, non-standard perspectives, which collectively limits their utility. As stem amniotes that are well-documented in the fossil record, seymouriamorphs provide a relatively accessible window through which to examine morphological changes associated with terrestrial lifestyles in Paleozoic tetrapods, and updated osteology of the postcranial skeleton with detailed figures and descriptions that can be readily utilized by other workers is of great import.

Materials & Methods

Neutron tomography

Histology

Systematic Paleontology

Anatomical Description

Histological Description

Discussion

As with the humerus, the femur of Seymouria is more ossified than in Utegenia or Ariekanerpeton (Laurin, 1996a; Laurin, 1996b); the femur of Utegenia has been described as featureless (Klembara & Ruta, 2004). The femur of Makowskia is known but has only been described as having a crescentic proximal articular surface with a deep intertrochanteric fossa as in Seymouria (Klembara, 2005), and the only corresponding figure is a simplified line drawing. The femur of Spinarerpeton has been similarly described and figured in limited detail (Klembara, 2009). The femur of Microphon is much more gracile than in Seymouria with less pronounced expansion of the epiphyses and a proportionally longer, narrower shaft (Bulanov, 2014). Microphon also differs from Seymouria in that the adductor crest extends towards the fibular condyle (Bulanov, 2014), as opposed to the tibial condyle as occurs in Seymouria and Discosauriscus (Klembara & Bartík, 2000). In addition, the intertrochanteric fossa of Microphon is approximately one-third the length of the femur (Bulanov, 2014), whereas in Seymouria it extends approximately halfway along the element. Kotlassia appears to be intermediate between these two conditions and exhibits a starker contrast between the slender shaft and the broadly expanded epiphyses (Bystrow, 1944: Fig. 9). A feature found in the femora of Microphon and Kotlassia and in ROMVP 80915, though perhaps not all specimens of Seymouria, is the lesser development of the trochanter (Bystrow, 1944); in Microphon, the trochanter seems to not be developed at all (Bulanov, 2014). The femur of Discosauriscus is similar to that of Seymouria in overall morphology but is more gracile (Klembara & Bartík, 2000: Fig. 25).

Histological interpretations and comparisons

Skeletochronological interpretations. In the absence of comparative histological data, most inferences regarding the life history of seymouriamorphs have been based on external anatomy of different skeletal regions. For example, most individuals of Discosauriscus retain lateral line canals on the skull, indicating an aquatic lifestyle, but this may also reflect a biased relative abundance of premetamorphic individuals in the fossil record (e.g., Klembara et al., 2006). Although definitive adults of this taxon, terrestrial or otherwise, are unknown (Klembara, Martens & Bartík, 2001), previous authors have inferred that Discosauriscus underwent metamorphosis (Klembara, 1995), or that if some species were paedomorphic, they were derived from an ancestor that did metamorphose into a terrestrial adult (e.g., Boy & Sues, 2000). For Discosauriscus austriacus, Sanchez et al. (2008) reported that metamorphosis occurred around the sixth year of life. Although not explicitly stated as such, determination of metamorphosis in that study was rendered feasible through the sampling of limb material of Discosauriscus from articulated skeletons that would permit correlation of the skeletochronological data from the histological analysis with external osteological features traditionally used for relative age determination.

As a result, determining whether a specimen of Seymouria is ‘postmetamorphic’ is based largely on an established precedent of using external features from which admittedly arbitrary and gradational terms such as ‘juvenile,’ ‘sub-adult,’ and ‘adult’ are derived. It bears noting that these terms may refer to different biological attributes (e.g., sexual maturation vs. the process of metamorphosis) and may be used differently by various workers. With respect to ROMVP 80916, the large partial femur that was sectioned, there is a well-established precedent for identifying the element as belonging to a probable ‘adult’ that had completed metamorphosis. ROMVP 80916 is incomplete, but the preserved portion is the same size as the complete ROMVP 80915, which measures 5.5 cm in length and which is on the larger end of previously reported specimens (e.g., 6.4 cm; White, 1939). Based on comparisons with articulated specimens of Seymouria (Berman, Reisz & Eberth, 1987; Berman et al., 2000), this femur would belong to an individual with a skull length exceeding 10 cm, which falls well within a range for which specimens have been previously described as ‘adults.’ Femora of the previously described articulated skeletons are smaller than ROMVP 80916 yet the skulls possess numerous features accepted as evidence for both somatic maturity and terrestriality, such as the absence of lateral line grooves, ossified carpals and tarsals, firmly interdigitated sutures, and pronounced ornamentation (Boy & Sues, 2000). ROMVP 81200 is smaller, measuring only 2.6 cm as preserved. By comparison with ROMVP 80915, assuming isometric scaling of the element, ROMVP 81200 would have been around 4.2 cm in length when preserved. Using this estimate and comparisons with articulated specimens, the skull of this individual would have been around 8 cm, which is only slightly below the lower size bound reported for most specimens of Seymouria (e.g., Berman, Reisz & Eberth, 1987) and which would at least represent a ‘sub-adult’ based on previous designations. Further evidence for a postmetamorphic determination may be found in the nature of the preservational environment of Richards Spur. Beyond the enigmatic and extremely rare aïstopod Sillerpeton permianum, there is no evidence of aquatic tetrapods, either larval forms of metamorphosing adults or obligately aquatic adult forms, even though material of very small-bodied tetrapods is captured (MacDougall et al., 2017). Regardless of whether this represents a biased sample, it is clear that the fissure fills were not conducive to the capture of aquatic tetrapods.

At least one other seymouriamorph, Karpinskiosaurus, is also represented only by specimens that lack lateral line grooves (Klembara, 2011). Kotlassia has also been historically regarded as lacking lateral line grooves (e.g., Bystrow, 1944), but the Kotlassia of most previous authors is actually a combination of material referable to the type species, Kotlassia prima, and material properly referable to Karpinskiosaurus (see Bulanov, 2002; Klembara, 2011, for discussion). Whether these grooves are definitively absent in the holotype of Ko. prima is not apparent from previous works that accounted for this historical discrepancy. For Karpinskiosaurus and Seymouria, it has been proposed that these taxa underwent metamorphosis relatively early in their development and lived on land for the majority of their lives (Klembara, 2011).

Conclusions

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Kayla D. Bazzana and Bryan M. Gee conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Joseph J. Bevitt performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Robert R. Reisz conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Unprocessed 16-bit TIFF slices are available at MorphoBank: https://morphobank.org/index.php/Projects/ProjectOverview/project_id/3549 (O’Leary & Kaufman, 2012).

Specimens OMNH 74721 and OMNH 79346-79353 are held by the Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History in Norman, Oklahoma, USA. Specimens ROMVP 80915-80917 and ROMVP 81198-81200 are held by the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the University of Toronto and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to Robert R. Reisz, an NSERC Scholarship to Kayla D. Bazzana, and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) to Bryan M. Gee. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

10 Citations 3,165 Views 1,176 Downloads