
Every so often I read an article that expresses something I had been thinking about. Such an article appeared in the only magazine I subscribe to, The Week, and the writer expressed it better than I ever could hope to.
Written by Editor-at-Large William Falk, it appeared in the September 5, 2025 issue of the magazine. So, without further ado…
As the United States descends into one-man, authoritarian rule, I sometimes wonder what Donald Trump’s collaborators really think. By collaborators, I do not mean the true MAGA cultists, who welcome his tyrannical intrusion into every aspect of American life, his military occupation of American cities, and his unrestrained use of government power to intimidate and punish opponents, critics, and immigrants.
The collaborators I am referring to are the once-principled Reaganites, the small-government libertarians, and the conservative commentariat who, through fear or tribal allegiance, are still defending or downplaying the Maximum Leader’s insistence that everyone — private companies, universities, museums, states, cities, the Fed, the Justice Department, other countries — must capitulate to his will or suffer his wrath.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is a useful example. In 2016, Rubio compared Trump to a “third-world strongman” and warned that “many people on the Right” will have “to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump because this is not going to end well.” Does “Little Marco” now feel this is likely to end well because he’s sold his soul?
Before his own cynical conversion, Vice President JD Vance observed that Trump was “an idiot” who was “unfit for our nation’s highest office” and might turn into “America’s Hitler.” Is the sour tang of tyranny more palatable now that JD sits at the ruler’s table?
And what of Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, the Russia hawks, the Supreme Court justices, and Republicans who once professed loyalty to free markets, free speech, and personal liberty, and celebrated America’s role as the “shining city on the hill”? Do they privately cringe over the North Korea–style groveling at Trump’s Cabinet meetings, his fawning admiration of the war criminal Vladimir Putin, his assault on laws, alliances, science, data, and reality itself, and the authoritarian precedents he is setting for future presidents? Do they ever say to spouses or confidantes: “My God, he’s crazy. He’s out of control”?
Their silence is their acquiescence, and makes them complicit in the damage already done, and in whatever insanity is to come.
Well said, Mr. Falk.
Image conjured using ChatGPT.












