It was good to see that her daughter appeared with her on this clip and that they are close; it sounds like she has three great and supportive children. I'm sorry to hear about her illness that she is struggling with. I think she would be a good supporting player if she ever made a comeback in acting. Paper Moon is one of my favorite movies and after seeing these clips I want to watch it again.
Showing posts with label Ryan O'Neal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ryan O'Neal. Show all posts
4/04/2011
Top 10 Box Office Stars of 1973 (USA)
The rankings come from Quigley Publishing Co.'s annual list (since 1932) of top money making stars in the USA, which based on a poll of hundreds of theater executives. The list does not rank stars only on how much cash their films made, but on what theater owners say about who attracts audiences on their star power alone.
1. Clint Eastwood
2. Ryan O'Neal 
3. Steve McQueen
5. Robert Redford
6. Barbra Streisand
7. Paul Newman
8. Charles Bronson
9. John Wayne
10. Marlon Brando
2/20/2010
Nickelodeon (1976) Directed by Peter Bogdonovich
In the early years of the twentieth century, the term "nickelodeon" had a few meanings. It could refer to a number of various types of music "jukeboxes" - the kind you might find in a penny arcade (immortalized in the famous Teresa Brewer pop song). There were also cinema nickelodeons, usually converted/renovated storefronts serving as theaters. They featured short silent films and seated usually up to 100 or so people. The price of admission was usually a nickel. By the way, if you ever get the chance to visit downtown Chicago (where I'm from), you can actually step back into time into a replica nickelodeon cinema (and view a short silent film) at the Museum of Science an Industry's permanent Yesterday's Main Street exhibit. This, along with Colleen Moore's Fairy Castle, are two must-sees for any classic film buff who visits the city.
Nickelodeon cinemas became less and less popular after 1915, the year DW Griffith's full-length feature film The Birth of A Nation was released. This was a dawn of a new era, when long, epic films competed against each other, and when grand movie palaces started to go up.
Writer-Director Peter Bogdonovich was fascinated with this era, and for a long time wanted to make a period film about the making of silents. By 1976 he had established himself as a credible film historian and author, and had interviewed many legends of Hollywood filmmaking, such as Orson Welles and John Ford, just to name a few. He received acclaim for his B/W period films The Last Picture Show and Paper Moon (starring Ryan and Tatum O'Neal), and paid homage to several film genres such as screwball comedy (with What's Up Doc) and Astaire/Rogers type musicals of the 30s (with At Long Last Love, which starred Burt Reynolds).
Was the world ready for a film about the silent era in 1976? No matter what, the dream project was going to happen. Interestingly, a silent movie was a hit that summer: Mel Brooks' madcap spoof Silent Movie sort of paved the way for another silent-themed film. And when it was time to cast the picture, Bogdonovich turned to actors he already worked with, including Reynolds (who also was in the Mel Brooks film, ironically) and Tatum, who had a hit that summer with Bad News Bears. Many were anxious to see her re-teamed with her father on the screen, and Nickelodeon would be that film. But since then, they have yet to appear together on screen again. 
Nickelodeon, co-written and directed by Bogdonovich, was released during the Christmas season in 1976 and takes place between the early cinema years 1910-1915. For authenticity, Bogdonovich wanted his film to be in B/W, but apparently the studio was against it for box-office reasons. I've seen both versions; the DVD has the Director's Cut (with commentary) and is in B/W, a version which I personally prefer. But there's value in the original theatrical color version as well; Laszlo Kovacs' beautiful cinematography brightens the period sets and costumes, and many scenes have a sepia-tone look.
There is alot to be learned about the history of cinema from watching this film (and from listening to the director's commentary on DVD, which I highly recommend!) I first watched it with a group of film students at a screening at the Gene Siskel Film Center at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago (The original theatrical, color version was shown) The professor speaking about the film was author and film historian Virginia Wright Wexman Her lecture before the screening helped me to appreciate this film all the more.
It was brought up in the lecture that during this time, many folks who who never intended to pursue a career in films ended up doing so anyway, and often, were very successful. The characters in the film of Reynold's "Buck" is a stuntman who ends up coming a movie star by complete accident, and Ryan O'Neal plays a failed-lawyer who also stumbles into the movie business when he meets an independent film producer (played by Brian Keith, in an over-the-top performance). Leo pitches a few story ideas to him, and he's soon on his way into movies. All these characters and scenarios are based on real life incidents, as told to Bogdonovich in a number of interviews he conducted with film directors of the pre-sound era, including Allan Dwan (who was a stagehand before becoming a writer-director), Raoul Walsh (who really was a stuntman before his directing career), and Leo McCarey (who really was a failed lawyer). In fact, almost every scene is inspired by a priceless, true story, or is an homage to an earlier film or director (the DVD's director commentary is a must-hear).
There isn't much of a plot to the film; mostly it's a series of scenes that center around one theme: "galloping tintypes", as they called movies back then. Often I just wanted to sit back in awe of what I experiencing; I really felt like I had been transported back in time. There are a few love triangles that give the film some romance. And providing the film with a sense of suspense and menace, the audience is introduced to the Motion Picture Patents Company, a group of studios formed to protect the invention of Thomas Edison's camera against copycats. But they could not stop a crop independents from making films with non-Edison cameras. The "Patents" often went to extreme measures to halt production on these independents, sometimes sending out goons to destroy the cameras. Nickelodeon features a number of scenes recreating some of these events. In one humorous scene, a Patent shoots a camera and a character exclaims, "He just killed a box!". 
Leo sets out to a secluded California town to make movies for his independent film company (a patent is on his trail). His crew, whom he never met, awaits him. The first person he meets is Tatum, whose unexciting character is a child prodigy called upon to be the head writer. John Ritter, in an early role, is great as a cameraman. Stella Stevens and model-turned actress Jane Hitchcock (in her screen debut) play leading ladies (Hitchcock, who is good in this, never appeared in another film, unfortunately). George Gaynes plays one of the lead actors, and he seems to be warming up for his future role as "Dr. Brewster" in Tootsie. Burt Reynolds comes in a bit later as the dashing leading man, playing all sorts of silent film characters. He is quite good in this role, and turns out an impressive comic performance, probably my favorite ever of his. There are a few small bit parts played by a few veteran western stars, including James Best and Harry Carey Jr., who has ties not only to westerns, but to the silent cinema, as his father was a silent film star. In one fun scene, the cast and crew travel to the big city and check out a nickelodeon theater, which happens to be showing one of their films (not a complete film, actually - you'll have to see the film). They are then followed out of the theater by fanatics (or, I should say, "fans") who recognize them and ask them for a souvenir. When they don't have anything to offer, the fanatics start ripping their clothes. Typical.
And here's another neat scene, which shows how several short silent movies were made at once, by one film company.
One of the best scenes is toward the end, which recreates the opening day of DW Griffith's The Birth of a Nation in 1915, a film that changed movies forever. The Los Angeles premiere had a full orchestra and even sound effects men behind the screen. Leo and company attend the premiere, which was called at first, "The Clansman". We are shown several extended clips from the actual movie, and Bogdonavich often cuts to audience reaction shots to demonstrate the incredible impact. At the end of the screening, the audiences is silent for a moment, then applause. Then a standing ovation by all, except Leo. He sits, and we wonder what he thinks. Is he jealous? Is his sad? Is he stunned? Then, the director of the epic - DW Griffith - walks out on the stage to take a bow, and Leo rises. A good scene.
The film didn't become a box office hit. Perhaps it was too history-heavy. There are a couple of potentially cringe-inducing scenes, one where white actors have to put on black makeup to play African tribal members, and another scene set at an original stage production of "The Clansman" featuring a stunt man in a white sheet and a burning cross. Historical, yes, but perhaps enough to turn off sensitive viewers. Also, advertising may have been a problem: the posters for this movie showed Tatum in a hot-air balloon, but there's no such scene in the film. And though it contains plenty of slapstick, it's heavily nostalgic. It certainly was a different kind of film for action star Burt Reynolds. Overall, it wouldn't be fair at all to call the film a failure, yet critics did have mixed feelings. Roger Ebert only gave the film two stars out of four (read review), commenting that 2/3 through the movie, it turns "from comedy to elegy". I could see his point; it did turn out to be a more serious film than I expected it would be. The last scene shows all of the main characters in a solemn state, pondering the future, and what the new age of films would bring. 
Finally, I want to mention one more scene, which comes close to the end, and it sort of broke my heart. At a Christmas party, an open canister of one of Leo's films is carelessly placed on a table and someone mistakes it for an ashtray. In this scene, we see how flammable nitrate film was, as it almost burns an entire room filled with people. Sad to think of it, but this sort of thing surely happened to many films of this era. In fact, over 80% of all films made between 1894-1930 are lost forever. More must be done to ensure that surviving silent films are preserved, restored, and viewed, so they can be discovered and  |
| Read The Posts | Donate |
For more perspectives on the film "Nickelodeon":
Alex wrote a critical review of this film not long ago from his blog Critic Picks (I enjoyed the movie much more)
Read Richard Eder's original 1976 review published in the New York Times.
Read Roger Ebert's original 1976 review published in the Chicago Sun Times.
Another great post from Dear Old Hollywood.
Bobby Rivers wrote about the ending of this film on his blog here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)