First of all thank you for all the work in preparation of translation of SWViewer and SWViewer/header.
I am just opening this thread to track translation progress. I see that you guys are fixing little issues. Please ping me once the page is actually ready and have no issues left, so that I can announce it at various places to get translators.
I have also added you two to SWViewer/members, in case you don't want feel free to remove yourself.
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
What about adding a feature where could be reported dubious edits and dubious newly-created pages (if an user si unsure whether a certain edit or newly-created page is vandalism or not, other users could verify those edits and pages)?
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
Enable patrolling of the displayed edit/diff. This should be available only for patrollers (if not possible, add an option to disable it i.e. remove the button). Maybe a button for this action can be placed at the 1st position (as most of the edits are usually fine). Here's a link to the API reference: MediaWiki API help: action=patrol
Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Other
Setup
unknown
Recently I made an improvement to config.json, preventing users from being pinged, but today someone reported that they got pinged, so I guess my change hasn't been processed yet. My question is: when will SWViewer load the new config?
defaultRollbackPrefix — is parameter for custom rollback: default prefix + custom reason. But here was used normal rollback. String is configured by the MediaWiki, not SWViewer.—Iluvatar (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I see, so apparently both use the same string, but the MediaWiki rollback suppresses the ping. Otherwise I would have received pings from those. So I think this is an issue with SWViewer. --bdijkstra (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
This isn't about user A receiving a ping when user B reverts their edit, this is about user C receiving a ping when user B reverts an edit by user A to the last revision by user C. In my notification settings, I have mention pings turned on, but I haven't received this kind of ping in ages, except recently with SWViewer. Presumably this user had the same experience. --bdijkstra (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
[BUG]: Report function adds improper newline before report
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
unknown
See diff on English Wikipedia: it's a list, so a blank line in between the list items ends the list and starts a new one, instead of adding an item to the list. This is minor, but it'd be nice if it was fixed. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Tol Seems no issues and these are unbulleted list after all and I think some noticeboard prefer newline and that's why it was added. (Don't remember exactly which require it). ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@1997kB, this is per English Wikipedia's w:en:WP:LISTGAP guideline section and for accessibility in general; this is problematic because it creates a new list instead of adding another item to the existing list. Would there be any way to change this just for English Wikipedia? Tol (talk | contribs) @ 00:11, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
[ADDITION + FEATURE]: About warnings on eswiki and enwikiquote
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Addition + Feature
Setup
unknown
Addition: First of all, on enwikiquote there are some vandal warnings yet to be added: For Spam, Level 1 and Level 2 (Last). Promotional/Advertising Spam: Only warring. Vandalism: 1 (more like for test edits in general), Level 2 (vandalism in general), Level 3, Level 4, there's also another warning, but it should be used only by admins, Lvl 5. Please add them, they're necessary. Also: vandals who passed the 4th or only warning, should be reported on q:Wikiquote:Vandalism in progress, with the following syntax, for IP addresses: * {{IPvandal|INSERT IP ADDRESS}}<br> Vandalism after the last or only warning. ~~~~ and * {{Vandal|INSERT USER}}<br>Vandalism after the last or only warning. ~~~~ for accounts. The header or thread text should read: New report {{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTTIME}}
Feature: On the other hand, I noticed that there's a problem with the speed deletion warnings in Spanish Wikipedia. SWViewer is using speedy deletions warnings from Huggle, which are now outdated and we now use the following syntax: {{subst:Aviso destruir|PAGE NAME HERE|REASON HERE}} ~~~~. The other speedy deletion criteria can be found in es:WP:CBR.
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
Hello! I feel like SWViewer shouldn't show edits to Custom Javascript and CSS pages since the majority of users can't do anything to them and it requires them to be an interface administrator. Including them in the SWViewer feed feels rather pointless if the majority of users can't do anything about them even if they're vandalism.
Well I knew that all userpages had an associated talk page, but I didn't know that CSS and JS pages had one, I didn't even know you could edit them. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#654515:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Translation errors
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, some of the Scowiki edit summaries are incorrect/Scotched. The Scots for "page" for example, is "page" rather than "paige", "Nae uiseful content" should be "Nae uissfu content", "Oot o projecht scope" should be "Oot o project scope" and "Baffle" should be "Haivers". I've asked a few other Scots editors to check in in case there's something I missed CiphriusKane (talk) 01:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
[FEATURE]: Remove edits that have already been reverted from the queue
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
I wish SWViewer could be able to remove from the queue edits that have already been rolled back by other good-faith users or bots, so as not to stumble upon irrelevant cases of vandalism.
That's not entirely correct. If you enable "live updates" in the recent changes list and filter for "latest revision" vandalism (enwiki example), it does this just fine, so it's not just possible but rather already implemented in production somewhere. ToBeFree (talk) 20:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I tried updating the config page a few times, but the updated edit summary is not showing, unless it’s related to the console or it’s something else that needs to be updated? Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'd suggest a similar feature like this, can we provide the level of warnings that user received close to their edits like Huggle? Lemonaka (talk) 04:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
[BUG]: Bug on summary at ptwiki
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
unknown
There is a small bug I have seen on pt.wikipedia from watching edits by another user. example 1, example 2. The summary does not separate user name of the user being reverted and it is displayed as if it were the same word.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
Latest version of Opera GX
As the title states, the talk doesn't seem to function on the Opera GX internet browser in that you are unable to send any messages. YOu can type a message and see others' messages, hwoever you can't send any yourself no matter what (clicking the send button doesn't work and neither does hitting enter). Works fine in Google Chrome
[FEATURE]: Mental health: Take a break popup and slow down stream
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Type
Feature
Setup
unknown
It can be easy to "get lost" in the stream. Can we implement a popup that notifies you to take a break after a certain (programmable) amount of time has passed? This feature is becoming increasingly common in certain websites/apps and I believe it helps with mental health. Having a way to artificially slow down the stream could also be helpful. Personally speaking, it generates anxiety for me.
Sakura emad, I suppose in a typical sleep function you'd get something like this: get all edits from the stream in that moment, sleep for 5 seconds, get all edits that happened during those 5 seconds up until that moment, sleep for 5 seconds, get all edits... While what I'm mostly after is: Get precisely 1 edit, sleep for 5 seconds, get 1 edit that is known that it isn't acted upon by anyone at the time shown, sleep for 5 seconds, get 1 edit that is known that... — Klein Muçi (talk) 09:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
[MINOR FEATURE]: Custom reverts should remember old given reasons (at least in the same session)
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Minor feature
Setup
unknown
Usually I tend to use only 2-3 general reasons on custom reverts. If they can be remembered and autosuggested in a dropdown menu it could save me a lot of hassle.
Latest comment: 1 year ago14 comments3 people in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
Firefox 110.0 (64-bit)
I've tried to use rollback instead of undo, but that checkbox is grayed out to me and therefore can't change it. As steward I can rollback in all CentralAuth wikis, so it's not clear to me why SWViewer won't let me rollback. See e.g. diff 149346152@eswiki. Thank you.
I have also tried to clear the cache, log-in, log-out, etc. without success. On the console, I see some CSP errors but it seems they're only reporting, and not actually blocking. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Superpes15: Happened on Meta too and some other projects; no idea why I can rollback "intermitently" then. I could rollback on eswiktionary yesterday as well, then swviewer only allowed me to undo. No idea what's going on :-) —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Checking here and there I think this was introduced in c304dcb by @Iluvatar and may be intentional, but is this the expected behaviour? Neither the global rollbacker nor the steward global groups are limited to a wikiset. Plus, on wikis where I am a local rollbacker or sysop I am being prevented from using it. I don't think rollback should be restricted. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
c304dcb is a feature to force undo instead rollback in a custom rollback for some wikis where (according to they rules) a rollback with comment does not equate to a undo. But just ruwiki now. Iluvatar (talk) 06:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Iluvatar and thanks for your reply. In my case SWViewer defaults to undo, but I'm not sure if this happens immediately after login or at a later point. It happened to me on both, default and custom rollback. I've tried to Ctrl+Shift+R several times to clear the cache and see if that fixed the issue, but it didn't. Please let me know if you need more details. Happy to do a live debug IRC session as well when we both can if needed. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Suggestion
Setup
unknown
When tagging a page on any wiki for deletion, SWViewer gives the user a bunch of set reasons for the tagging. Often, though, it would be quite helpful and convenient if it allowed entering a reason manually instead of having to "edit" the page to do so. Similar to how undoing with reason works, I think this will be useful.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Type
Bug
Setup
unknown
When I go to SWViewer, the queue and chatboard don't active on my phone though my desktop still fine. I reloaded that page, but not useful. And day by day that error is still there. Can everyone help me? Quangkhanhhuynh (talk) 10:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply