Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/06/28
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q126907889: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
For advertising purposes Selamiben (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126755129: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 23:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126689621: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 23:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q107364235: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails WD:N, created for self-promotion Nemoralis (talk) 00:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q101099318: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not really an established universe. There are some cameos, but not much interaction between properties (barring some specific, separate universes like Q7894222. --(Oinkers42) (talk) 00:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep- Yes, but the universe itself does not exist, and it being used as a universe in itself. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Trade We could use your input as creator. Is there outside coverage of this being a shared universe? --Emu (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I made this item specifically to connect different Walt Disney Animation Sutiods film universes to each other through P361. Trade (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Trade Yeah, I understand that, but is there a connection apart from those universes all being produced by Disney? And if so, is there a source that says so? --Emu (talk) 10:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- I made this item specifically to connect different Walt Disney Animation Sutiods film universes to each other through P361. Trade (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- They don't need to have crossover to be legitimate. It is just a way to aggregate all the universes produced by Disney. --RAN (talk) 23:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, but under which WD:N provision would that fall? --Emu (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- For that matter: what notability criterion do the individual "film universes" fall under? Is there a meaningful distinction between them and their respective films and/or film franchises? Omphalographer (talk) 01:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Structural need. Trade (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- What structural need? The primary types of relationships involving these entities appear to be:
- That a fictional entity is from narrative universe (P1080) a universe. However, this is redundant to the statement that they are present in work (P1441) in one or more movies and/or other media, and/or they are an element of a media franchise (P8345).
- That the universe is a fictional universe described in (P1445) one or more works. This is, again, redundant to the media franchise (P8345) of those works.
- That the universes have a specific series ordinal (P1545) within Q101099318. This appears to be original synthesis; I'm not aware of any official implication that (for example) The Lion King universe (Q73544451) is a direct successor to Aladdin universe (Q84249261) simply because their movies came out one after another.
- Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- What structural need? The primary types of relationships involving these entities appear to be:
- Structural need. Trade (talk) 22:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- For that matter: what notability criterion do the individual "film universes" fall under? Is there a meaningful distinction between them and their respective films and/or film franchises? Omphalographer (talk) 01:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, but under which WD:N provision would that fall? --Emu (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not one of the items I looked at had a single reference I could use to verify any of the statements, so
Delete unless references are added. - Nikki (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC) - Delete No real reason to keep them, undersourced --Emu (talk) 23:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: per reasons provided by RAN Jack4576 (talk) 12:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete For sure there's Disney movies that contain fictional universes, but calling them "universe of Disney movie X" or whatever is kind of nonsensical. Like item lists "Aladdin universe", but the movie takes place in the fictional Arabian city of Agrabah. Sure, it's a fictional city, but "universe"? No. Whereas the Great Mouse Detective, which is also on the list, takes place in late 1800s London. Again, that's not a "universe." Really, this whole thing is an exercise in taking the titles of random Disney movies, putting the word "universe" at the end, and calling it a "Disney universe." Which is clearly just non-sensical, unverifiable, and not what Wikidata exits for. What's next, a list of "Walt Disney Animation Studios film universe foods" that lists spaghetti, among other real world dishes, because of that one scene in Lady and the Tramp? Come on. It's at least an exercise in pointless minutia if nothing else. Although again, I don't think its in line with the purpose of Wikidata. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep- not going to supervote by closing this as not done, but I think this should qualify as filling a structural need under WD:N #3. As I've noted in the past, we should air on the side of inclusion so long as it doesn't violate BLP and isn't blatant advertizing. Someone might find this useful. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)- I don't think it can qualify as fulfilling a structural need if it's not actually necessary to store the data. Omphalographer already pointed out that we have other properties for data like this. If there is actually a structural need, someone should be able to explain what data this allows us to store that we otherwise can't. - Nikki (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- What do you think about all the one-movie fictional universes that are being created? Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I think those are pretty unnecessary. Also, fair point Nikki (and Omphalographer) - on reconsideration I think I'm comfortable deleting this. No objections to fictional universe articles in general, but there should be some reason for them. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- What do you think about all the one-movie fictional universes that are being created? Bovlb (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think it can qualify as fulfilling a structural need if it's not actually necessary to store the data. Omphalographer already pointed out that we have other properties for data like this. If there is actually a structural need, someone should be able to explain what data this allows us to store that we otherwise can't. - Nikki (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- 81.233.91.76 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC))
- This IP has created many fictional universes over the last few days which I think are all or mostly Disney. I don't know how this relates to Trade's item, but it seems like something that should be considered together. Bovlb (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- This has been open for almost eight months, and there are three votes for keep, and three for delete, thus no consensus. Therefore, maybe this could be closed as not deleted, considering there isn't a consensus to delete nor to keep? EPIC (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- RfD discussion aren’t elections, they are only meant to bring forward new arguments. Therefore, deciding them isn’t tallying the vote but rather weighing the arguments, i. e. deciding if any of the notability criteria is met. --Emu (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, I'm leaning towards delete as some of the deletion arguments are quite strong, but also unsure as it might go under WD:N #3. EPIC (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- RfD discussion aren’t elections, they are only meant to bring forward new arguments. Therefore, deciding them isn’t tallying the vote but rather weighing the arguments, i. e. deciding if any of the notability criteria is met. --Emu (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Like Ajraddatz I don't want to supervote by closing without clear consensus, but I think this should be a delete - no sources listed that talk about this being a thing and I don't think it actually fulfills a structural need --DannyS712 (talk) 20:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also a little unsure about the actual structural need of this. However, it seems like a whopping 54 items link here - those will have to be cleaned up if deleted, but if it's not an actual established thing I don't see a problem with deleting. EPIC (talk) 00:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion has been stale for a while and the winds seemed pretty tilted towards deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q111704289: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability --2804:14D:BAA0:93EC:1D8D:FA75:8BB:6FFC 14:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q73389562: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
There's a genuine question as to whether this entry should exist: it's about a scientific article which does not, properly, have a separate existence. It's just the 'preface and acknowledgments' section that somehow got classed as a separate article. Note that the DOI is in use in two entries. DS (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- It was part of an import of items with PubMed publication ID (P698); is it more useful to say it's an unrecognised identifier or a "preface and acknowledgments" section? The statements for this type of item could probably be improved. The DOI is correct here; the other article was written by the same authors and published in the same issue, although it is missing from the index (https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/international-journal-of-medical-informatics/vol/60/issue/2). Peter James (talk) 14:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- maybe just make it into a redirect? DS (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q124607692: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Dorades (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q86993242: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126908184: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126898424: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126890022: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears non-notable and self-promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q107740792: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails WD:N, Created for self-promotion Nemoralis (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126911940: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q118805706: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. This isn't a journal article, it's an annoucement of a new service by a company that works with academic journals (note the pagecount is 1). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q118807718: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. This isn't a journal article, it's an annoucement of a new service by a company that works with academic journals (note the pagecount is 1). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q118797890: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. This isn't a journal article, it's an annoucement that they bought another company (note the pagecount is 1). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Oleg Firer (Q16216548): Grenada diplomat: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability, deleted wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oleg_Firer --2804:14D:BAA0:95F0:84AF:9457:94CC:ACB7 19:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There's still a Commons category linked, and one of the images in that category is used in an article on a sister project, so the category isn't going anywhere anytime soon. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Not deleted [1] suggest notability. It's not because he is not notable on Wikipedia that he is not notable here. Fralambert (talk) 14:46, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Burial of Christ (Q126912750): painting by Fra Angelico, San Marco Cell 2: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This entry was created by me with the intention of adding a mural by Fra Angelico to the database. However, I have found that the same mural has an entry already under a different label, so I did not see it at first (Q3685116). --SuzzaneMcg (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
invalid ID (L1330917): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexeme (confusion with item) VIGNERON (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q124038672: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No references that such a thing actually exists, only link is the movie Dumbo itself. Created by an IP that went on a universe-creating spree. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Q126926254: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Sorry my mistake, item to be deleted LucaBiondi (talk) 18:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)