Skip to content

consider refactoring basic validations of forecast data #64

@elray1

Description

@elray1
  • It seems like many functions will want to do the kinds of checks that are being done here -- should we extract them into a function in hubUtils or hubValidations?
  • Additionally/alternatively, should that function just accept an object that has the information about task ids, output types and type ids, and value columns as attributes (as outlined in this comment) and assume they've already been validated? Or call a function that's designed to do these validation checks based on that data structure?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions