Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
223 lines (169 loc) · 10.4 KB

GOVERNANCE.md

File metadata and controls

223 lines (169 loc) · 10.4 KB

OpenCloudMesh Go Project Governance

This governance explains how the OpenCloudMesh Go project is run.

The OpenCloudMesh Go project is dedicated to creating a runnable Open Cloud Mesh (OCM) peer in Go that implements a strict, WebDAV-centered subset of the OCM protocol. This governance explains how the project is run.

Current status

OpenCloudMesh Go is currently a solo-maintainer project. The multi-maintainer mechanisms below (Maintainer Council, voting, becoming or removing a maintainer) are written so they are ready when the project grows a second maintainer; with a single maintainer today, that maintainer holds all decision and merge authority. Sections that do not yet apply to a solo project are marked as such rather than removed, so the governance stays honest about the project's current scale.

Values

The OpenCloudMesh Go and its leadership embrace the following values:

  • Openness: Communication and decision-making happens in the open and is discoverable for future reference. As much as possible, all discussions and work take place in public forums and open repositories.

  • Fairness: All stakeholders have the opportunity to provide feedback and submit contributions, which will be considered on their merits.

  • Community over Product or Company: Sustaining and growing our community takes priority over shipping code or sponsors' organizational goals. Each contributor participates in the project as an individual.

  • Vendor Neutrality: The project direction and decisions are not controlled by any single organization. Maintainer selection, roadmap prioritization, and release decisions are made based on project merit, not employer affiliation.

  • Inclusivity: We innovate through different perspectives and skill sets, which can only be accomplished in a welcoming and respectful environment.

  • Participation: Responsibilities within the project are earned through participation, and there is a clear path up the contributor ladder into leadership positions.

Maintainers

OpenCloudMesh Go Maintainers have write access to the project GitHub repository. They can merge their own patches or patches from others. The current maintainers can be found in MAINTAINERS.md. Maintainers collectively manage the project's resources and contributors.

This privilege is granted with some expectation of responsibility: maintainers are people who care about the OpenCloudMesh Go project and want to help it grow and improve. A maintainer is not just someone who can make changes, but someone who has demonstrated their ability to collaborate with the team, get the most knowledgeable people to review code and docs, contribute high-quality code, and follow through to fix issues (in code or tests).

A maintainer is a contributor to the project's success and a citizen helping the project succeed.

The collective team of all Maintainers is known as the Maintainer Council, which is the governing body for the project.

Becoming a Maintainer

To become a Maintainer you need to demonstrate the following:

  • commitment to the project:
    • participate in discussions, contributions, code and documentation reviews for 3 months or more,
    • perform reviews for 5 non-trivial pull requests,
    • contribute 5 non-trivial pull requests and have them merged,
  • ability to write quality code and/or documentation,
  • ability to collaborate with the team,
  • understanding of how the team works (policies, processes for testing and code review, etc),
  • understanding of the project's code base and coding and documentation style.

A new Maintainer must be proposed by an existing maintainer by opening an issue on the GitHub issue tracker. A simple majority vote of existing Maintainers approves the application. Maintainer nominations will be evaluated without prejudice to employer or demographics and should consider the organizational diversity of the maintainer group.

Maintainers who are selected will be granted the necessary GitHub rights, and invited to private maintainer channels as those channels are created.

Removing a Maintainer

Maintainers may resign at any time if they feel that they will not be able to continue fulfilling their project duties.

Maintainers may also be removed after being inactive, failure to fulfill their Maintainer responsibilities, violating the Code of Conduct, or other reasons. Inactivity is defined as a period of very low or no activity in the project for 6 months or more, with no definite schedule to return to full Maintainer activity.

A Maintainer may be removed at any time by a 2/3 vote of the remaining maintainers.

Emeritus Maintainers

Depending on the reason for removal or resignation, a Maintainer may be converted to Emeritus status. Emeritus Maintainers are recognized for their past contributions and may still be consulted on project matters, but do not have voting rights or merge access. Emeritus Maintainers are listed in MAINTAINERS.md under a separate Emeritus section.

An Emeritus Maintainer may be reinstated to active Maintainer status by a simple majority vote of existing Maintainers, provided they meet the current Maintainer requirements and can commit to ongoing participation.

Succession and access continuity

Because OpenCloudMesh Go is a solo-maintainer project today, this section names a concrete succession plan so the project can continue with minimal interruption if the maintainer dies, is incapacitated, or is otherwise unable or unwilling to continue. The goal is that, within a week of confirmed loss of support, a successor can create and close issues, accept proposed changes, and release versions of the software.

The maintainer nominates the following successors. Each is a long-standing Open Cloud Mesh contributor and co-author of the OCM specification work, with the standing to continue the project in the spirit it was started:

Name GitHub Affiliation
Giuseppe Lo Presti @glpatcern CERN
Micke Nordin @mickenordin SUNET
Michiel de Jong @michielbdejong PonderSource

The successors are authorized, on confirmation that the maintainer can no longer continue, to take over the project by the most practical available route:

  • transfer or fork the project repository so they regain merge and release authority,
  • take over publishing releases, and
  • continue issue triage and community coordination.

To make that possible, the maintainer keeps the material needed to continue the project in a recoverable location accessible to the successors: the release signing key material, the GitHub account recovery information, and any DNS or domain records tied to the project. The maintainer confirms consent with each named successor before relying on this plan, and revisits the successor list at least once a year.

This is a nomination, not a transfer of ownership while the maintainer is active. It exists so the project is not orphaned if the maintainer is no longer able to continue.

Meetings

Time zones permitting, Maintainers are expected to participate in the public developer discussion, which today takes place on the GitHub issue tracker rather than a recurring meeting. There is no scheduled developer or maintainer meeting at this time; one will be added when the project has regular contributors who would benefit from it.

Maintainers will also have closed meetings in order to discuss security reports or Code of Conduct violations. Such meetings should be scheduled by any Maintainer on receipt of a security issue or CoC report. All current Maintainers must be invited to such closed meetings, except for any Maintainer who is accused of a CoC violation.

Code of Conduct

Code of Conduct violations by community members will be discussed and resolved privately by the Maintainers, via the contact methods listed in that document. If a Maintainer is directly involved in a report and a second Maintainer is available, the other Maintainer handles it. As a solo-maintainer project today, escalation to an external conduct committee is not configured; one will be designated if the project grows a second maintainer.

Security Response Team

The Maintainers will appoint a Security Response Team to handle security reports. This committee may simply consist of the Maintainer Council themselves. If this responsibility is delegated, the Maintainers will appoint a team of at least two contributors to handle it. The Maintainers will review who is assigned to this at least once a year.

The Security Response Team is responsible for handling all reports of security holes and breaches according to the security policy.

Voting

While most business in OpenCloudMesh Go is conducted by "lazy consensus", periodically the Maintainers may need to vote on specific actions or changes. A vote can be taken on the GitHub issue tracker, or privately for security or conduct matters. Any Maintainer may demand a vote be taken.

Most votes require a simple majority of all Maintainers to succeed, except where otherwise noted. Two-thirds majority votes mean at least two-thirds of all existing maintainers.

Modifying this Charter

Changes to this Governance and its supporting documents may be approved by a 2/3 vote of the Maintainers.