You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Correct EventModeling dependency provenance and qualify its kernel image pairing #674
ArcRuntimeView/README.md:13–16 says central Arc 22.50.4 and Chronicle 19.31.10, while actual central versions are 22.156.4 and 19.115.3. Its Compose image genuinely remains 19.31.10-development.
This makes package provenance misleading and leaves the client/kernel pairing unqualified. Different version numbers alone do not prove a runtime failure; none was reproduced.
Expected outcome
Correct both READMEs and clearly distinguish central application packages, local tool pins and the server image. Prefer links to the central source of truth over repeatedly copied version tables. Align the server image with a demonstrated compatible client release, or document evidence for the retained pairing instead of silently treating it as qualified.
Do not downgrade packages to match stale prose or upgrade intentionally pinned generation tools solely because they are old. Historical issue #622 and merged PR #623 establish original delivery, not correction of this current drift.
Base:f3234f8 (main, 2026-11-02) Status: proposed Size / release intent: S · patch Reviewed: independent Claude reviewer — README/central/image discrepancies confirmed; no runtime-failure claim
Problem and root cause
FromMartenAndWolverine README duplicates stale9.45/6.45 versions instead of central9.49/6.49. ArcRuntimeView similarly describes22.50.4/19.31.10 while central selects22.156.4/19.115.3; its server really remains19.31.10-development.
Approach
Make package provenance truthful and make the server pairing explicit. Prefer links to central declarations over duplicated version literals. Do not infer incompatible behavior merely from different version numbers.
Steps
Drift-check both READMEs, central props, project references and image.
Correct package statements, separating application, tool and server versions.
Either align the server image to a verified compatible release and prove its walkthrough, or explicitly document the retained pairing as unqualified until evidence exists.
Keep intentionally pinned CLI/Screenplay tools unless a separately justified migration is required.
Files to touch
EventModeling/FromMartenAndWolverine/README.md, EventModeling/ArcRuntimeView/README.md; ArcRuntimeView Compose only if intentionally qualifying a new image.
Public API, compatibility, migration
No intended API change. Any image change is a separate compatibility-affecting part of the same issue, not an incidental prose edit.
Performance
None for documentation. Use bounded acceptance waits if image changes.
Specs to add (red first)
Check documented provenance against central declarations. An image change requires the relevant startup/event-model walkthrough, not only compilation.
Gate (exact commands from the repo's CI)
Documentation-only correction: static comparison to props/project/image and catalog validation yarn samples:validate where applicable. If image/runtime behavior changes, existing build gates include:
These commands do not alone prove the walkthrough against the image; add bounded targeted acceptance when changing the pair. No commands executed for this design.
Done when
Both READMEs accurately distinguish package/tool/server provenance.
Server pairing is qualified or explicitly labeled unqualified, not silently assumed.
No dependency downgrade or unjustified tool upgrade accompanies prose repair.
Risks and open questions
Image publication and runtime compatibility remain unverified; do not label the existing pair broken without reproduction.
Out of scope
Generated Shop refresh, broad dependency updates and historical delivery issues.
Activity
woksin commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Implementation design (rev 1)
Base: f3234f8 (main, 2026-11-02)
Status: proposed
Size / release intent: S · patch
Reviewed: independent Claude reviewer — README/central/image discrepancies confirmed; no runtime-failure claim
Problem and root cause
FromMartenAndWolverine README duplicates stale9.45/6.45 versions instead of central9.49/6.49. ArcRuntimeView similarly describes22.50.4/19.31.10 while central selects22.156.4/19.115.3; its server really remains19.31.10-development.
Approach
Make package provenance truthful and make the server pairing explicit. Prefer links to central declarations over duplicated version literals. Do not infer incompatible behavior merely from different version numbers.
Steps
Files to touch
EventModeling/FromMartenAndWolverine/README.md,EventModeling/ArcRuntimeView/README.md; ArcRuntimeView Compose only if intentionally qualifying a new image.Public API, compatibility, migration
No intended API change. Any image change is a separate compatibility-affecting part of the same issue, not an incidental prose edit.
Performance
None for documentation. Use bounded acceptance waits if image changes.
Specs to add (red first)
Check documented provenance against central declarations. An image change requires the relevant startup/event-model walkthrough, not only compilation.
Gate (exact commands from the repo's CI)
Documentation-only correction: static comparison to props/project/image and catalog validation
yarn samples:validatewhere applicable. If image/runtime behavior changes, existing build gates include:These commands do not alone prove the walkthrough against the image; add bounded targeted acceptance when changing the pair. No commands executed for this design.
Done when
Risks and open questions
Image publication and runtime compatibility remain unverified; do not label the existing pair broken without reproduction.
Out of scope
Generated Shop refresh, broad dependency updates and historical delivery issues.