Fix some near-bugs related to ResourceOwner function arguments

These functions took a ResourceOwner argument, but only checked if it
was NULL, and then used CurrentResourceOwner for the actual work.
Surely the intention was to use the passed-in resource owner. All
current callers passed CurrentResourceOwner or NULL, so this has no
consequences at the moment, but it's an accident waiting to happen for
future caller and extensions.

Author: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEze2Whnfv8VuRZaohE-Af+GxBA1SNfD_rXfm84Jv-958UCcJA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c
index 59d625b244c72174d6bfe0557dbb187a22f0032f..59d3825917b819c907406db4dd21572b0589f7fb 100644 (file)
--- a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c
@@ -1638,7 +1638,7 @@ ReleaseCatCacheWithOwner(HeapTuple tuple, ResourceOwner resowner)
 
    ct->refcount--;
    if (resowner)
-       ResourceOwnerForgetCatCacheRef(CurrentResourceOwner, &ct->tuple);
+       ResourceOwnerForgetCatCacheRef(resowner, &ct->tuple);
 
    if (
 #ifndef CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
@@ -2083,7 +2083,7 @@ ReleaseCatCacheListWithOwner(CatCList *list, ResourceOwner resowner)
    Assert(list->refcount > 0);
    list->refcount--;
    if (resowner)
-       ResourceOwnerForgetCatCacheListRef(CurrentResourceOwner, list);
+       ResourceOwnerForgetCatCacheListRef(resowner, list);
 
    if (
 #ifndef CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE