http://archives.postgresql.org
+Received: from correo.adinet.com.uy (fecorreo01.adinet.com.uy [206.99.44.217])
+ by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g0NJDWU29832
+Received: from adinet.com.uy (200.61.76.155) by correo.adinet.com.uy (5.5.052) (authenticated as
[email protected])
+ id 3C4DBC5C00017E9F; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:13:25 -0300
+Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 16:15:12 -0300
+X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U)
+X-Accept-Language: en
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Savepoints
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Status: OR
+
+Bruce Momjian wrote:
+>
+> Basically, under my plan, WAL would be unchanged. WAL's function is
+> crash recovery, and it would retain that. There would also be no
+> on-disk changes. I would use the command counter in certain cases to
+> identify savepoints.
+
+This is a pointer to the previous August thread, where your original proposal
+was posted, and some WAL/not WAL discussion took place. Just not to repeat the
+already mentioned points. Oh, it's google archive just for fun, and to not
+overload hub.org ;-)
+
+http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=200108050432.f754Wdo11696%40candle.pha.pa.us&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26selm%3D200108050432.f754Wdo11696%2540candle.pha.pa.us
+
+Regards,
+Haroldo.
+