Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lynne Covington
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Eugene van der Pijll 02:03, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Cousin and best friend of Britney Spears; seems non-notable on her own. tregoweth 00:34, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but maybe mention briefly in Britney Spears if not already there. -Hmib 00:49, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notable accomplishments, and being cousins with a celebrity doesn't cut it. User:Uber nemo 00:53, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; non-notable. Maybe put some of it in Britney Spears. Jaxl | talk 01:04, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete about 150 hits on google, and a waste of about 2 minutes of my life. (And i'm an inclusionist!) Themindset 01:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- An inclusionist voting delete? OMG!</sarcasm>. Themindset, no offense intented, it was too funny to pass, and someone has to put some humor in otherwise-dull VfD. :P On a more serious note,
merge any possible useful content to Britney Spears and thendelete. --Titoxd 01:33, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]- On an even more serious note, we cannot delete after a merge, since the GFDL insists we maintain the authorship history which we do by retaining a redirect to the merge target. -Splash 02:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't know that. I stand corrected. But this might be a non-issue, since the complaints that nothing is worth merging look like they are true. I've changed my vote to reflect that. --Titoxd 07:43, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- On an even more serious note, we cannot delete after a merge, since the GFDL insists we maintain the authorship history which we do by retaining a redirect to the merge target. -Splash 02:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- An inclusionist voting delete? OMG!</sarcasm>. Themindset, no offense intented, it was too funny to pass, and someone has to put some humor in otherwise-dull VfD. :P On a more serious note,
- Delete. Not notable. Nothing worth merging. -- BD2412 talk 01:39, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- your mother's sibling's children's accomplishments do not make you notable. JDoorjam 02:34, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability is not inherited, no matter how white your teeth. -Splash 02:55, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not even smergable. Notability is not an airborne virus. Fernando Rizo T/C 07:28, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Some airborne viruses, however, are notable. JDoorjam 00:57, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Touché :) Fernando Rizo T/C 07:48, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Some airborne viruses, however, are notable. JDoorjam 00:57, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN --Dysepsion 22:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable, no need for an article. GregAsche 23:03, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.