User talk:Nuwordlife0rder

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nuwordlife0rder! Thank you for your contributions. I am Chipmunkdavis and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CMD (talk) 06:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kathleen Hermosa. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)-->[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isko Moreno 2022 presidential campaign

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Isko Moreno 2022 presidential campaign. It is very much appreciated. However, please note that the endorsements list is arranged in an alphabetical order (by surname, when applicable). You failed to do that here. Thank you. _signed,Pat ^talk 05:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. Rest assured I will re-arrange the order as per your recommendation. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Cheers! _signed,Pat ^talk 09:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from COVID-19 pandemic in Metro Manila into Isko Moreno. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this info. Much appreciated. Will do moving forward. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of infobox

Having a YouTube channel doesn't make you a YouTube personality, and Infobox YouTube template is intended to be used for YouTube personalities only. You can remove this template from the politician-related articles you mentioned earlier if you based this just because you have seen it from those articles you mentioned. —Princess Faye ^{(my talk)} 16:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube personality by politician

Why user Wikipedia princess faye deleted politicians' YouTube channels and why LancePHYT (talk) 04:30, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LancePHYT: Infobox for YouTube personalities is intended to be used by YouTube personality-related articles, not politicians, see. They're politicians. Having a YouTube channel doesn't make you a YouTube personality. They're became popular for being a politician, not a YouTuber. —Princess Faye ^{(my talk)} 07:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They're not even notable for being a YouTube personality, no reasons to include that. Putting their YouTube channels again is just like you are promoting their channels. —Princess Faye ^{(my talk)} 07:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize about their YouTube to politicians

I apologize about that on the YouTube channel of politicians and I don't know that it's political porpuses and I apologize Princess Faye(Ctrlwiki) and thank you again... LancePHYT (talk) 08:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that their channel is for political purposes only. —Princess Faye ^{(my talk)} 08:46, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isko Moreno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crash course. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avelino Razon has been accepted

Avelino Razon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Balita (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. References seem more promotional than anything in-depth or independent. We also list for what someone is mainly notable for, not 10 different occupations in the first line of the lede.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carl Balita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carl Balita, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nuwordlife0rder! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:PH seal of Cauayan, Negros Occidental.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PH seal of Cauayan, Negros Occidental.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Forgot it. My apologies. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 11:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candidates in the 2022 Philippine presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DENR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Balita

The other editor didn't create a new article about Carl Balita from scratch, they merely moved your draft from draftspace to mainspace without waiting for it to be reviewed at AFC -- which means that the draft wasn't its own separate thing that would still have to be assessed independently of what happened to the mainspace article anymore, because the mainspace article was the draft and the only thing left in draftspace was a redirect to the mainspace article.

So whatever happens to it in mainspace, such as speedy deletion on G11 (advertorialized promotion) grounds, is its status in draft form, because the article and the draft were the same thing. (The person who had tagged it for speedy deletion also admittedly tagged it G4 (recreation of previously deleted content), but that wasn't really applicable because it was very different in structure and sourcing from the original version that was deleted at AFD a few years ago -- but the advertorialism tag was still applicable, especially since the draft had already been rejected once before for the same reason.

Under the circumstances, I'm willing to restore the page back to draftspace again, but it won't be able to stay in the pending review queue as if the speedy deletion hadn't already covered that off -- it is going to require further improvement before it can be resubmitted, because the article was literally your draft moved into mainspace and so the speedy deletion that happened was essentially a "review" of the draft. Bearcat (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the response. I totally understand the aforementioned circumstances and I apologize if the other editor made such a move. The editor should have waited for the AFC review just like what I was doing before it was deleted. May you restore the original draftspace again please? I will do the necessary improvement, comply whatever needs to be complied, and resubmit it accordingly. Thank you so much for clearing this and I really appreciate your help. Cheers! Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 16:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Censoria Cajes-Yap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Unity Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Balita (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

As I noted in my prior comment, the speedy deletion that happened in early August was equally valid to an AFC review in its determination that this is too advertorialized for mainspace in its current form. However, since that time, you changed just two words in the entire article before resubmitting it to the review queue again, which is not enough change to warrant a new review at this time.
Once it's been rejected, regardless of whether that's by AFC or by it getting speedy deleted when somebody tries to bypass AFC by moving it themselves, you have to significantly (not just two words) improve the article before it can be considered again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carl Balita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook links in External links section

Hi Nuwordlife0rder. I noticed you are adding facebook links to multiple articles, and I was wondering what reason is behind that. Per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL we usually include only one official link (the article subject's website), and not additional social media links. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In the Philippines, nowadays, schools are more actively using Facebook as their primary site. Websites are less often used in the country since Facebook has a wider reach. Some schools even terminated their website in favor of their official Facebook page. Please let me know if you have further questions. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but as long as there is an official website and it is linked in the el-section, there is no need to add a Facebook link. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. This is noted. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 09:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carl Balita (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carl Balita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 19:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Nuwordlife0rder: violates BURDEN, adds FICTREFs, restores OR regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 10:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries and citations

On the article Philippine Independent Church you seem to forget adding an edit summary. You can change the setting to remind you and can make a dummy edit to include one forgotten. This is an important aspect of Wikipedia. Also, you have made a number of contributions without sources. This is not just important but required on any contribution that is contested or might be contested. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, specifically WP:Burden. -- Thank you in advance for your cooperation, -- Otr500 (talk) 09:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Talk:Philippine Independent Church#Violating WP:BURDEN, adding FICTREFs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I am extending you a nice warning that continually adding unsourced and contested material can have deleterious consequences. Personal attacks can have dire consequences. Otr500 (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying my best to add sources as per my previous edits lately. Thank you for the reminder. I have no history of personal attacks as well. Cheers! :) Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Anglo-Catholic churches, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I apologize. I acknowledge that Puerto Rico is a territory. My bad. It was done on WP:Good faith. As for the Philippine Independent Church, I will add a source for that at a later time. Stay WP:COOL. Have a great day and be blessed. Cheers! Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Independientes" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Independientes and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Independientes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 03:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 10:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for the notice. Nuwordlife0rder (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Isko Moreno, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't use line breaks per WP:ACCESSIBILITY & MOS:NOBREAKS or small in infoboxes per MOS:SMALLFONT Sciencefish (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philippine Independent Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mission Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Union of Utrecht (Old Catholic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Roman Catholic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Union of Utrecht (Old Catholic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Roman Catholic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Royiswariii. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jhoanna (singer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Royiswariii Talk! 02:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RheeTimbangCoatofArmsNonFree.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RheeTimbangCoatofArmsNonFree.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Old Catholic churches

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Old Catholic churches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#List of Old Catholic churches]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Veverve (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RheeTimbangCoatofArmsNonFree.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RheeTimbangCoatofArmsNonFree.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of OM XII Fajutagana.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]