User talk:Jeremy Bentham
Hi Jeremy, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks very much for tackling these First World War battles and so forth. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Geoff/Gsl 06:11, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nice article. I've submitted it to appear on the front page of Wikipedia at: Template talk:Did you know#February 8 suggestions. It'll probably appear on the front page in about 2 days. --brian0918™ 03:49, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Well done! --mav 07:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
{{HUMONGOUS HUG}}
[edit]Just wanted to say Bravo! for all your WONDERFUL work on U.S. history and U.S. military history. And that Dull Knife Fight is the official best name of any battle ever. EVER! (I'm usually not this hysterical, but I'm just so impressed.) jengod 19:14, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
Nice to meet you. Is Jeremy Bentham your real name? If so, it might be a good idea to make that clear on your user page, to avoid being asked to change it. Deb 18:07, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hi, Jeremy. Thanks for the kind words, especially from someone who obviously has a strong interest and background in the subject of "battles." See you around Wikipedia. --Lordkinbote 03:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Great Articles
[edit]Jeremy, you've got some great articles! Did you know that if starting a stub article you can use one of the Category:Military history stubs(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types#Military_history) stub types to attract other editors interested in your articles? You may also be interested in using this category to expand on other needed Military History articles. These categories are part of the WP:WSS project. Xaosflux 02:56, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello, want to contribute?
[edit]Hi Jeremy! My name is Dennis Nilsson and I am currently working on the refinement of the article List of Battles of World War I. I noticed that you made a couple of additions of battles on the article Caucasus Campaign and since the Caucasus Campaign did not exist in the article, I added it along with the battles that came from you. I wonder if you would consider contributing to List of Battles of World War I, since you seem to have knowledge. Feel no pressure, though. If you want to send me a message, do it on my talk page. My regards, Dennis Nilsson. Dna-Dennis talk - contribs 02:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Nice article
[edit]The Battle of Santa Cruz de Rosales article is pretty good. Have you submited it to Did you know? -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 14:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Battle of Santa Cruz de Rosales, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Tuxpan
[edit]Nice catch with my edit on Tuxpan, sorry for that. After looking for it, the actual name of the city is Tuxpan (without the accent) so the article may need to be moved to the correct title at some point. Cheers. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 03:26, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Hi! Please be aware that changing another user's comments (like so, for instance) may be considered vandalism and is generally frowned upon. —Kirill Lokshin 03:57, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Comment will be deleted
[edit]Hi. I like your additions to:
Elwell Stephen Otis But they are not referenced. Can you provide a reference to this statment which you added[1]:
- Otis was a generally disliked commander by his subordinates and the general public. He was nicknamed "Granny" by his troops because of his age and graying hair.
Otherwise I will delete it after a week. I looked on the web and on google print and amazon, and could find no reference to this at all.
signed:Travb 05:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Andrew´s Page
[edit]Hello, Dear Jeremy. I have just written a page about Fort Fisher. I would like that You may check it and -- later -- you may tell me your qualification. I´m particularly interested about grammatical issues. Anytime. --AndresArce 13:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)AndresArce
Michael Corcoran Place of Birth
[edit]Jeremy, You started the above-named article, stating that Michael Corcoran was born in County Donegal, Ireland, but further evidence has shown that he was actually born in County Sligo (see the page itself for the references). I and some other editors have had to revert a particular editor a number of times, who continuously changes this place back to Donegal. In the interest of fairness, I'd be interested to know where your reference to Corcoran's place of birth as Donegal comes from. Thanks. --The.Q | Talk 12:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
William Jenkins Worth
[edit]That was my great great great great (its either 3 or 4, I always forget) grandfather. Good work on the article :) 198.6.46.11 19:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Bayou Teche Campaign
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Bayou Teche Campaign requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Conquest of Canaan
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Conquest of Canaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were working on the article when I moved it to the proper spelling of Harpers Ferry. I hope I didn't cause any problems. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Merger of Battle of Santa Fe and Battle of Cañoncito
[edit]Hi. I've proposed a merger of Battle of Santa Fe and Battle of Cañoncito. If you want to participate in the discussion, it's here. —JerryFriedman (Talk) 06:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Army of the Tennessee
[edit]Jeremy: I know you have contributed to the Army of the Tennessee article. I don't know whether you've noticed that I have been expanding it lately. I have now listed it for A-Class review and just wanted to let you know. Hartfelt (talk) 13:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Charles Adam Heckman
[edit]Just a ping that you forgot to include a bibliography here. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Referencing problem with First Battle of Pyramid Lake
[edit]Hi Jeremy. I came across your article First Battle of Pyramid Lake and noticed that its referencing is unclear. At present you have a number of inline citations to Michno but as you haven't included the full citation in the references section per WP:CITESHORT it is impossible to know which of Gregory Michno's many books you are referencing. Can you please add the full citation in the appropriate place? Exactly the same problem exists with Battle of Williams Station. Thank in advance. Anotherclown (talk) 16:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I have found the information from the Second Battle of Pyramid Lake and I have added it myself. In future please ensure to include it in your articles though. Cheers. Anotherclown (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Veracruz order of battle
[edit]Your order of battle has two entries for the 2nd U. S. Infantry and none for the 5th U. S. Infantry that should be there. Can you check your list and make one of those 2nd's a 5th? Been adding commanding officers of regiments using the William Hugh Robarts, "Mexican War veterans : a complete roster of the regular and volunteer troops in the war between the United States and Mexico, from 1846 to 1848 ; the volunteers are arranged by states, alphabetically", BRENTANO'S, (A. S. WITHERBEE & CO , Proprietors,; WASHINGTON, D. C., 1887. pp.10-13. You may want to look that over and add the rest.Asiaticus (talk) 07:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Harrison Carroll Hobart
[edit]Hi you started an article about Harrison Hobart; there is another one of the same man Harrison Carroll Hobart they need to be merge. Thank you-RFD (talk) 13:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority
- Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
- You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
- If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1st Regiment New Mexico Volunteer Cavalry, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.researchonline.net/nmcw/unit21.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox Ghost Dance War has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Jeremy Bentham! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In Battle of Fort Smith, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Douglas Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Napoleon B. McLaughlen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited New Orleans American order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Carroll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thames American order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judge Advocate General (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yazoo City Expedition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mississippi Central Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Charleston Harbor Confederate order of battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnson Hagood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Corinth Confederate order of battle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samuel Jones and Charles Clark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph A. Haskin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Fort Gibson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sentry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William H. Penrose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army of the Shenandoah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Jeremy Bentham. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Tonto Basin Campaign
[edit]
Template:Campaignbox Tonto Basin Campaign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Milton Thayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James E. Boyd. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Confederate Order of Battle- Siege of Charleston
[edit]Hey. I am looking into the above topic. It seems rather incomplete, so may I ask your sources? The units at Grimball's Landing for instance, are not there. Colquitts's Georgia regiments for instance. I have the Official Records, Sifakis compendium, among many others, so I will do some research and try complete the OOB. I postet on the Talk page too. I also have to add that the Military districts of South Carolina around Charleston is a nightmare to research. (TomV71 (talk) 10:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)).
Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Southern Plains Campaign
[edit]Template:Campaignbox Southern Plains Campaign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jeremy Bentham. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Jeremy Bentham. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Open wikis as sources
[edit]I saw that, some years back, you used an article from an open wiki as a source for an article.[2][3] Without reviewing your editing history I don't know if this was a exception. But in any case, pleasre review WP:SELFPUBLISH, which makes it clear that wikis like that are not acceptable sources. If you used it repeatedly, please be kind enough to go back and replace the citations with better sources. Mobi Ditch (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)