Jump to content

Talk:Bill Sammon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is he related to "Patrick Sammon", a Republican activist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmegill (talkcontribs) 04:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems slanted against Mr. Sammon. It does not have the air of impartiality. Criddic (talk) 23:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a damn shame. If only there was a way to modify a Wikipedia article and render it different than the original version...lol Hayewood Jablome (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Sammon Writings

[edit]

Does Mr. Sammon no longer write any columns? Abenr (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Criddick's remarks. This article looks like it was written by those idiots at Media Matters, i.e., a liberal propaganda outfit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorlyssD (talkcontribs) 05:01, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV?

[edit]

The controversy section of this page is severely anti-FNC. There's no context, something even a Huffington Post article on the controversy gave.

In the article on the Huffington Post, this passage follows the quote that finishes that controversy:

Sammon goes on to say that he stopped thinking the idea was far-fetched when he saw Obama taking action to prop up the ailing American car industry.

From this:


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/29/fox-news-bill-sammon-obama-socialism-far-fetched_n_841829.html PokeHomsar (talk) 01:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So quit whining and change it. Hayewood Jablome (talk) 17:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done - that speech section showed no evidence of controversy whatsoever. Toddst1 (talk) 00:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Sammon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]