Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.

You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

Click here to add a new section

Shortcuts

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	14
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 04:21:06 on December 3, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Resysop request (BorgQueen)

BorgQueen (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log)

Hi, I've been desysopped due to inactivity that had lasted for more than a year. I'm back now and would like to have the admin tools back. Thanks :D --BorgQueen (talk) 20:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-anything observation) The username's worth it alone :) ——SerialNumber54129 20:16, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great to see you back, BorgQueen! :) I'm sure the 'crats will be along shortly. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, there is a standard 24-hour hold on these requests for review and commentary. — xaosflux ^Talk 21:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's a nice message to see at the start of the week. I'll happily flip the switch if I'm around in 3 hours' time. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 17:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Welcome back. 28bytes (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overdue BAG nomination

Not entirely urgent, but Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/TheSandDoctor hit the full seven-day mark a little while ago. I don't imagine it will be too taxing of a close, but since BAG noms aren't listed in {{Cratstats}}, I though a heads-up might be welcome. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's worth a ping here. Closed as successful. WJBscribe (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also just a note to say that there are entries missing from Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/Successful membership candidacies, I think mostly in the period 2008-2011. If someone has a minute to go through the nominations and update it, that would be much appreciated. WJBscribe (talk) 17:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]