Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.

Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))

My barnstar collection is here.

Current Projects

This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years, 6 months and 25 days.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
♂This user is male.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Categories
to improve Wikipedia categorization.
This user has created a global account.
(-o-) This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games.
719 This user has owned 719 species of Pokémon in Pokémon X.
This user uses Google Maps.
This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

100k+

Current Outstanding admin load

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 79
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 97
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 71
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 34
Requested RD1 redactions 2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 17
Open sockpuppet investigations 40
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 1
Vandalism 0
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 0
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 6
Other candidates 16
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 79 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This need to be protected prior to the start of the event to prevent any weeaboos ruined the editing of the winners list. VernardoLau (talk) 18:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Pages are not protected preemptively. (Babysharkboss2) 18:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Guess I shall wait till the end of the event before I could request the protection since early protection don't work out here. VernardoLau (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Please wait until there is a significant level of disruption, not the end of the event, and not the very first edit that's vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
  DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-Protection: Constant IP vandalism about representation. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  User(s) blocked. El_C 21:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP editor. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Hello. Given that this article has been the victim not only of sockpuppets but also a bone of contention who claim that one did this and the other that, avoiding good coexistence, teamwork and contributing to Wikipedia; I request through this message that the the block is only and exclusively for Extended confirmed users. With this we continue to avoid more problems, although I do not understand why you should delete editions with their sources just because it was done by a sockpuppet. Thank you. JeanMercier90 (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Several IPs trying to make unjustified changes/deletions, possibly self-promotional or autobiographical. Edit warring in progress, held by some open proxy IPs (already blocked for 3 years each one) and just being continued by a new apparent malicious IP (I've requested an open-proxy check for this last one IP). I suggest a semi-protection to prevent further sabotage, thanks. PedroAcero76 (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Gelasin (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism. IP accounts have vandalized the page, unexplained deletions, unsourced additions, and poor formatting. This has been occurring since the creation of the page in 2021. Sazzrel (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Continued vandalism repeatedly adding the same false information. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Semi protection needed as Numerous IP change data without reference, mostly by false info, for the lastest of the season cyclone Chido. Pierre cb (talk) 23:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 23:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

  Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Uwsi (talk) 02:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The case page is not a reliable indicator of if an LTA is active or not, especially if they're reveling in the attention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @Yamaguchi先生 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
20:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Axedd for being in touch and Jéské for the ping. Axedd, you are already able to edit this article in the currently protected state. For context, there have been over 18 different page protections applied over the years due to long term abuse, block evasion, and persistent disruption in general. In light of this, was there any specific reason that you're looking to see this page unprotected? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotection: Requesting a reduction to indef WP:ECP, per conversation on talk page of imposing administrator. Move protection can remain at indef sysop. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I'll have to disagree. Just look at the page history. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:28, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I looked at the page history and the deleted contributions prior to making this request. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:05, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Eric dying in 2014. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Jonghyun dying in 2017. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should at least be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The season is completed. 2A02:C7C:A01:3E00:6416:9E81:7DAB:2ECD (talk) 13:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

The protection expires in less than two weeks. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: No distruptive editing, page has been protected for a long time. Main article is not protected Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.

The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,

Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.

I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥  01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Js (request) 2024-12-12 22:26 Fully protected (log) Protected by Lupin on 2006-01-25: "javascript template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
12 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Designation (request) 2024-12-03 05:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Chem2 (request) 2024-12-03 23:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2021-08-18: "High risk template."
Module:Authority control/config (request) 2024-12-05 20:48 Template-protected (log) Modified by Favonian on 2022-12-25: "High-risk Lua module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Nihongo (request) 2024-12-06 16:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-26: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Expand language (request) 2024-12-07 12:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Anomie on 2013-11-17: "Allow templateeditors to edit, per WT:RFPP#Mass protection lowering from "sysop" to "editprotected" (script-assisted edit)"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2024-12-07 23:32 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Template:Draft article (request) 2024-12-08 09:00 Template-protected (log) Protected by Gogo Dodo on 2015-05-02: "Highly visible template"
Template:Tracked/styles.css (request) 2024-12-09 11:39 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-02-17: "Highly visible template: match parent"
Template:Country data Syria (request) 2024-12-09 17:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:DYK tools (request) 2024-12-10 19:58 Template-protected (log) Protected by Hut 8.5 on 2016-12-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:Template for discussion/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2016-10-30: ""
Template:Tfm/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tfm/dated: Protected by Ged UK on 2013-11-12: "Highly visible template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Stating my support here. Encouraged him to seek this. He's told me about his plans for future articles and they seem to involve careful research up to GNG standards. His recent work has passed through GA and DYK, so quality is there. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
  Done. SilverLocust 💬 02:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  Done Thanks for taking all the suggestions on board; good work! Schwede66 01:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I have created 40 articles out of which 2 are deleted with a total edits of 2680, as of now. I also found myself listed in Wikipedia:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege. I promise, it'll be worth if I'm given the Autopatrolled privilege. Thanks, Hoping for a positive response. Taabii (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry but the two deletions at AfD mean that your creations will have to be review for at least another year or so.   Not done. – Joe (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe Thanks for the response. Taabii (talk) 17:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Created 69 articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done Clean articles. I agree with your assessment, User:Pppery. That said, I suggest that you don't have to list candidates here where you've satisfied yourself that they are eligible; you can just assign the flag yourself. Schwede66 01:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I, Indonesiainfo24, hereby request to be granted the Autopatrolled status on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the creation and maintenance of articles on Wikipedia, and I always strive to adhere to the guidelines and policies in place, including neutrality, verifiability, and article quality standards.

The reasons I am requesting this status are as follows:

  • I have contributed to articles that have been published, making improvements and adding relevant information.
  • I am familiar with the guidelines for good and proper writing on Wikipedia.
  • I have not engaged in vandalism or any other violations of Wikipedia's policies.

I hope my request will be considered, and I am committed to continuing my contributions in a manner that aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thank you for your attention and the opportunity.

Sincerely, Indonesiainfo24 it has begun... 13:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has created roughly 5 articles. MusikBot talk 13:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  Not done No LLM-generated permission requests. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I have created 400+ well-sourced articles on military, history, literature, politics, and academia, including recent BLPs. I believe i meet the criteria for autopatrolled rights. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 08:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


I need to distribute barnstars for the November 2024 Unreferenced article Backlog drive and was advised that this was the best way to do it. (See discussion on Backlog drive Talk page.) Cielquiparle (talk) 04:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Requesting a swap of my AWB perms to User:Synorem (AWB). This is a legitimate alternate account specifically for AWB tasks as to prevent edit count inflation on my main account. Synorem (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done. Primefac (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Requesting AWB rights for an account created specifically for semi-automatic edits. (Here are my AWB edits on this account to date.) Remsense ‥  04:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done, and threw in extended-confirmed and temporary confirmed. SilverLocust 💬 07:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason.

I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 19:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Seems reasonable to me. Will give Dr vulpes a chance to opine before granting. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not done Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights To improve the references for the page Flint water crisis. Emannnt (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not done You seem to have no idea what you are doing. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

I want to be a confirmed Wikipedia user because I would like to share my experiences with different kinds of things. For example "Minecraft" as a player i would like to add my experiences and report problems like bugs. Theteacher reference (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Not done "Sharing your experiences" is explicitly not what Wikipedia is for, and certainly not a valid reason to confirm an account early. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Legitimate alternate account used for improving articles via WP:AWB. Synorem (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

Vulcan would like to be able to rename files and to help others in doing so. Already have similar role in Commons. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:21, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Comment: I just declined ~15 of the requests made by the requestor because they do not meet our local requirements to be eligible for renaming. Among the worst offenders were File:Snowfall.gif and File:New Scientist.jpg; neither are completely meaningless, thus they do clearly do not meet WP:FNC#2. I imagine our criteria differs from commons, as I am unfamiliar with their system there. I would recommend that the candidate be asked to take some more time and demonstrate a better understanding of local file renaming procedure before granting a request here. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 20:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose as Godsy says, and given the note that I left them on the talk-page. I'd advise them to gain more experience in the area, and contribute elsewhere? Additionally, most of their rename requests recently were out of the question, here and both per Commons (adding this as Godsy said, they aren't aware of how file renaming works on Commons). ─ Aafī on Mobile (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Agreed, and thank you both. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily (yes, mistakenly got a copyright report for an article) focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh.

Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  Not done, having reviewed your participation at AfD, I'm not seeing any clear indication that you understand the relevant policies, guidelines, and discussion norms. signed, Rosguill talk 17:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to become an NPR to help reduce the work, I regularly intervene on drafts and edit them to format them and put banners or comments to advise the creator on the steps to follow so that this draft becomes eligible, in the case that it is possible. I know the rules of Wikipedia and the essential points determining if an article is eligible or not. I see drafts being submitted but they are clearly not ready to be accepted and unfortunately I can't do anything at this time. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in this permission. However, I'm concerned that your AfD participation is largely limited to pile-on votes at this time and is not indicative of sufficient understanding of relevant policies and guidelines. Some of the reasoning and wording of these !votes is further concerning (e.g. at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Cordeiro, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Januário Jesus).   Not done signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)


I'm requesting new page reviewer rights.

Hello I'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm meet all minimum requirements. I'm over 45+ AfC reviews and 5+ Accepted drafts. I'm adding tags {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} tags. I'm created 4 articles named Tropical Storm Maria (2024), Typhoon Ampil (2024), Typhoon Shanshan (2024), Typhoon Krathon. ~🌀 Ampil 💬 / 📝 04:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

  Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedian,

I am requesting for New Page Reviewer rights to enhance my contributions to Wikipedia. With major experience in article creation, editing, and compliance to Wikipedia’s guidelines, I am passionate to help ensure new pages meet quality standards. I am committed to improving the Wikipedia community and would greatly appreciate your consideration.

Thank you for your time! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  Not done. You still have not taken the advice given to you and lack the appropriate experience at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Adding that I'm also very experienced in cleaning formatting, copy editing, wiki linking etc. as I often do that before accepting AfC submissions, and for evidence of criteria #3 about being kind to new users, I think I've helped a good amount of users understand policies/guidelines/reasons for AfC declines etc, a small subset of these can by verified on my user talk page and I'm also very active on the help IRC (admittedly less during the last week due to a personal event). I'm also knowledgable about copyvios, having cleaned a decent amount, informing users about our policy, answering any questions they sent to me and requesting revdel. I've also reviewed around 20 cases on CopyPatrol. Thanks again for your time :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to help contribute reduce the large backlog of unreviewed new pages. I've been an active AFC reviewer for a while. I've contributed to and created dozens of articles that are still live to date. ANUwrites 06:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

After I was granted the right some weeks ago, I have been reviewing new articles and since it expires in 6 days, I would like to request for an extension Tesleemah (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 19 December 2024 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([6]). MusikBot talk 21:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

I monitor recent edits to combat vandalism and improve articles, I also act on drafts, I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: as a sure guarantee my use of rollback is done safely and without causing any significant issue, I'll use Mr. Stradivarius' ConfirmRollback. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

  Automated comment This user has 186 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
  Not done I don't see enough of a history of quality contributions to articles yet. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: User changed their name from Tres Libras to Jet Pilot since submitting this request. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, that's true. Jet Pilot (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. However, I mostly edit on my school computer so I am unable to use any tools such as Huggle, RedWarn, etc. Thank you for considering my request.

Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozuteacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)


    Immediate requests

    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 83
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 18
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1

    Deletion

    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 499
    Templates for deletion 127
    Categories for deletion 85
    Wikipedia files for discussion 66
    All redirects for discussion 286
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 23
    Possible copyright violations 13
    All articles proposed for deletion 263
    All files proposed for deletion 112
    Unsorted AfD debates 2
    All files with the same name on Commons 2
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 295
    Unknown copyright status 47
    Unknown source 58
    No non-free use rationale 3
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 30

    Page protection

    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,239
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 440
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,324
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,082 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,001 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,335 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 39,996 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,133 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 535,200 7.73
    All articles lacking sources 71,556 1.03
    All unreferenced BLPs 8 0
    All articles needing additional references 474,674 6.86
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,611 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,491 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 314,650 4.54

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 138 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,065 0.02
    All articles to be split 810 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 1 -
    Stub categories 19,264 -
    All uncategorized pages 665 0.01
    All orphaned articles 52,933 0.76
    All articles needing copy edit 2,416 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,584 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,760 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,493 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    Category Entries
    Requested moves 420
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,338
    All accuracy disputes 15,751
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 65,979

    Special pages

    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links