Talk:Geany
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Early comments
editI certainly think this article should NOT be deleted - a the links at the bottom of the page or just a Google search for genie review provides several reviews of the program. Further, since it's a software program which is automatically installable with Ubuntu Linux, I'd say that also warrants its inclusion. I recommend the {{notability}} tag be removed. --AndyKali (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Actually that is not the policy. There needs to be a significant coverage by reliable independent sources of the subject of the article. If you can show those, the article can be kept. W Nowicki (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Does anybody know, what does the name stand for or what did it come from? Although I'm not sure if it is important enough to be included in the article itself, at least here it would be nice to find that information
-UserHuge (talk) 00:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- the logo suggests it's Genie from the bottle.Errarel (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100216182754/http://geany.darwinports.com:80/ to http://geany.darwinports.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Can an Wikipedia article be used as citation source ?
editDear all,
other articles in Wikipedia provide the citation demanded in the article Geany.
Can they be used as a reference source, to provided the citation needed ?
All the best,
--Hgfernan (talk) 04:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Hgfernan: - I answered on your Talk page. Paulscrawl (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)