Wikipedia

Métis Nation of Ontario

The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) is the government of Métis citizens and communities within Ontario that is recognized by the Canadian government.[1] It is the democratic representative of the Métis communities represented by the MNO, with the responsibility of providing responsible and accountable self-government for its citizens and Métis communities in Ontario.[2][3]

Métis Nation of Ontario
AbbreviationMNO
FormationOctober 2, 1993; 31 years ago (1993-10-02)
TypeNonprofit
PurposeRepresenting Métis people residing in Ontario
HeadquartersSuite 1100 – 66 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5H1
Region
Ontario
Membership20,000 (in 2020)
President
Margaret Froh
AffiliationsMétis National Council
Websitemetisnation.org

The Métis communities represented by the MNO constitute one of the Métis collectives that collectively comprise the Métis Nation, an Indigenous People that emerged with its own distinct identity, language, culture, institutions, and way of life in the Historic Métis Nation Homeland prior to Canada’s westward expansion into the historic North-West.[4]

History of Métis People and Communities in Ontario

edit

Métis populations have existed in Ontario since the late 1700s.[5] The two major fur trading companies, the Hudson's Bay Company and the North West Company, both banned employees from having relationships with Indigenous women, but that did not stop some of the men from doing so.[6][7] While many Métis were of French descent, according to Campbell, there was a significant Anglo-Métis population around the Great Lakes and James Bay areas, who were the result of marriages à la façon du pays between Indigenous women and English or Scottish fur traders and British soldiers.[8][9] Peterson writes that there were mixed populations that started to live around forts run by these companies, particularly around places such as Sault Ste. Marie,[10] near the present U.S.-Canada border, and along James Bay in communities that today are known as Moosonee and Moose Factory.[9]

Andersen, Chartrand and Reimer posit that the Métis community in Manitoba[11] could possibly be descended from this group.[12][13] Many of these Métis were forced to practice their traditions in private while publicly assimilating into white Canadian society with varying degrees of success. However, growing prejudice from incoming settlers made that a challenging route as well. With increased immigration to Canada, reserves became in many cases the only safe enclaves for Indigenous peoples to practice their traditions and way of life. This is one reason most Canadians today are unaware that there are Métis in the Great Lakes region.[5] Jennifer Hayter adds: "With increased immigration to Canada, reserves became in many cases the only safe enclaves for Indigenous peoples to practice their traditions and way of life. This is one reason most Canadians today are unaware that there are Métis in the Great Lakes region. Despite all of this, the Métis survived and small but growing communities still thrive in the Great Lakes. The landmark R v. Powley case of 2003 brought this situation to national attention when the judge ruled that the Métis community had become ‘invisible’ but was not destroyed."[14]

Whether these people in Ontario self-identified as Métis at the time is a matter of serious dispute. The recent rise in self-identified Métis in Ontario both challenges the common narrative that the Métis community developed solely in the Red River area,[12] and raises concerns for many about the issue of settler self-indigenization.[15] It has been argued by scholars and elders of recognized Indigenous communities in the region that calling this community "Métis" is an act of settler self-indigenization, as "people of mixed blood in the region either integrated into Indigenous communities or assimilated with European newcomers, unlike the distinct Metis People of Louis Riel in Western Canada" and that "there was no such thing as a Metis community here in this region."[15] Andersen writes that to call these people "Métis" is an inappropriate "racialization" - placing an inaccurate, colonial label based on "misrecognition" of perceived or imagined racial differences rather than on actual socio-cultural attributes.[13][10]

History of the MNO

edit

The Métis Nation of Ontario was formed in 1993, along with associations in other provinces and territories, to provide a political platform for Métis in Ontario. This was first tested in 2003 in the R. vs. Powley (2003) Supreme Court of Canada ruling that recognized the Métis as Indigenous people with rights to hunt and fish in accordance with their traditional lifestyles and developed a test of Métis identity now known as the "Powley test".[16] This contrasted with a definition developed by the MNO which focuses on self-identification as Métis, having at least one Indigenous grandparent, and whose application was accepted by the MNO.[16][12]

This case involved two members of the Sault Ste. Marie Métis community facing hunting violation charges under the Ontario Game and Fish Act. In Powley, the Court clarified that Section 35 recognizes that the Métis are a “distinctive rights-bearing peoples whose own integral practices are entitled to constitutional protection under s. 35(1)” and reflecting the Métis peoples post-contact ethnogenesis, the Court rejected the argument that Métis rights must find their origins in pre-contact practices of the Métis peoples’ First Nations ancestors.

The Court was also clear that “[t]he term ‘Métis” in s. 35 does not encompass all individuals with mixed Indian and European heritage; rather, it refers to distinctive peoples who, in addition to their mixed ancestry, developed their own customs, way of life, and recognizable group identity separate from their Indian or Inuit and European forebears.”[17]

Building on this, the Court also outlined criteria to identify Métis persons for the purpose of claiming Section 35 Métis rights. In a historic win for the Powleys, Métis Nation of Ontario, and the Métis people more broadly, the Supreme Court not only cleared the Powleys but also established a landmark legal precedent, affirmed the historic and contemporary existence of the Sault Ste. Marie Métis community, and established the framework for identifying Métis communities in other areas of the province as well as other parts of Canada.[18][19][20]

To this day, distinctive Métis communities endure in the Upper Great Lakes region and in other parts of Ontario. In 2017, the province of Ontario, after historical research and negotiations with the Métis Nation of Ontario, officially recognized six additional historical Métis communities in the province that meet the evidentiary criteria set forth in the 2003 Powley decision, in addition to the long-established Métis community at Sault Ste. Marie.[21]

These historical and contemporary communities remain interconnected, not only by physical waterways but also through intricate kinship networks that unite Métis families across their ancestral homelands. In pursuit of verification, the Métis Nation of Ontario scrutinized primary documents,[22][23][24][25] identifying objectively verifiable Métis "root ancestors" and their descendants, who constituted the rights-bearing historical Métis communities in Ontario.

Structure

edit

The MNO governance structure is set up in a style similar to a democratically elected, provincial government.[26] The Community Councils serve as the main connection point between MNO citizens and the provincial leadership. Assistance and resources are provided by the MNO to the Community Councils to carry out their mandates and make sure they are managed well.[27] Each Community Council also has a seat for a Youth representative that works with the Métis Nation of Ontario Youth Council and stands for Métis youth in the region.[28]

 
Map of the community councils managed by the Métis Nation of Ontario

The provincial leadership takes the form of the Provisional Council of the Métis Nation of Ontario (PCMNO), which is accountable to MNO citizens at their Annual General Assemblies. It deals with issues and decisions that affect the Métis as a whole throughout Ontario. The PCMNO has an executive section with five members, nine councilors for the different regions of Ontario, representatives for the youth and university-age segments of the populations, and four senators. The current president is Margaret Froh, who is the first female president of the MNO. A lawyer by training, she has previously worked in Indigenous law and administration and policy at the MNO.[29]

Self-Government

edit

In February 2023, a significant milestone was reached as Canada and the MNO came together to sign a Métis Self-Government Recognition and Implementation Agreement. It builds upon foundations laid on June 27, 2019, when the MNO and the Government of Canada (Canada) signed the MNO-Canada Métis Government Recognition and Self-Government Agreement (the “Self-Government Agreement”), and the formal negotiations initiated in 2017.

The 2019 Self-Government Agreement recognized the MNO’s self-governance rights and outlined a clear path for the transition of existing governance structures into a federally recognized Métis Government. Canada had also committed to passing implementation legislation at that time.

This legislation formally acknowledges certain Métis governments’ ability to exercise inherent rights including the right to self-government and self-determination. This Self-Government Agreement and legislation solely pertain to Métis people and do not impact First Nations, Inuit, or any other Canadians.[30]

Past disputes within the Métis National Council

edit

At the 2018 Annual General Meeting of the Métis National Council (MNC), National Council vice president David Chartrand expressed concerns about how the Ontario Métis organization defines people as Métis. The MNC suspended the Ontario body's membership in the governance institutions of the Métis Nation.[31] The National Council also raised concerns that 90% of the purported Métis who have registered with the Ontario group did not fulfill the requirements of citizenship put in place by the Council in 2002, notably the requirement for an ancestral link to the Métis homelands and the Red River area specifically.[31][32]

If they want to end the suspension, the Métis National Council resolved that the MNO must implement a stricter definition of Métis status. In response to the Council's resolution, MNO Vice President France Picotte said that she didn't care about the ruling because "[The Council] has no authority over us."[32]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the MNO received a $205,000 grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada's Immunization Partnership Fund to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among Métis citizens in Ontario.[33]

References

edit
  1. ^ Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (24 February 2023). "Canada and Métis Nation of Ontario sign updated Métis self-government agreement". Canada.ca. Government of Canada. Retrieved 4 April 2023. ... Upon signing this Agreement, Canada officially recognizes that the Métis Nation of Ontario is the Indigenous government representing its citizens and Métis communities within Ontario ...
  2. ^ Métis Nation of Ontario; His Majesty the King in Right of Canada (23 February 2023). "Métis Self-Government Recognition and Implementation Agreement" (PDF). metisnation.org. Chapter 6.04 (‘Recognition’). Retrieved 20 May 2024. ... The Métis Government is the democratic representative of the Métis Communities Represented by the MNO with the responsibility for providing responsible and accountable self-government for its Citizens and Métis Communities in Ontario. ...
  3. ^ Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada. "Recognizing and Implementing Métis Nation Self-Government in Ontario". Canada.ca. Government of Canada. Retrieved 10 December 2023.
  4. ^ Métis Nation of Ontario; His Majesty the King in Right of Canada (23 February 2023). "Métis Self-Government Recognition and Implementation Agreement" (PDF). metisnation.org. Chapter 6.01 (‘Recognition’). Retrieved 20 May 2024. ... The Métis Communities Represented by the MNO is one of the Métis collectivities that together make up the Métis Nation, an Indigenous People that emerged with its own identity, language, culture, institutions, and way of life in the Historic Métis Nation Homeland before Canada's westward expansion into the historic North-West. ...
  5. ^ a b "Rivers of resistance: A history of the Métis Nation of Ontario". Canadian Geographic. 19 September 2022. Retrieved 14 October 2023.
  6. ^ Brown, J. S. H. (1996). "Fur Trade as Centrifuge: Familial Dispersal and Offspring Identity in Two Company Contexts." In DeMallie, R. J., & Ortiz, A. (eds.), North American Indian Anthropology: Essays on Society and Culture (pp. 197-219). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  7. ^ Brown, J. S. H. (1980). Strangers in Blood: Fur Trade Families in Indian Country. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  8. ^ Campbell, S. ""I shall settle, marry, and trade here": British military personnel and their mixed-blood descendants." (2007). In Lischke, U. & McNab, D., (eds.) The Long Journey of a Forgotten People: Métis Identities and Histories (pp. 81-108). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
  9. ^ a b Long, J. (1985). "Treaty No. 9 and Fur Trade Company Families: Northeastern Ontario's Halfbreeds, Indians, Petitioners, and Métis." In Peterson, J. & Brown, J. (eds.) The New Peoples: Being and Becoming Metis in North America (pp. 137–62). Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
  10. ^ a b Peterson, J. (1985). "Many roads to Red River: Metis genesis in the Great Lakes region, 1680–1815." In Peterson, J. & Brown, J. (eds) The New Peoples: Being and Becoming Metis in North America (pp. 37-71). Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
  11. ^ Ens, Gerhard (1983). "Manitoba History: Métis Lands in Manitoba". Manitoba Historical Society. Retrieved 13 October 2024.
  12. ^ a b c Reimer, G., & Chartrand, J. (2004). Documenting Historic Metis in Ontario. Ethnohistory, 51(3), 567-607.
  13. ^ a b Andersen, C. (2001). "Moya 'Tipimsook ("The People Who Aren't Their Own Bosses"): Racialization and the Misrecognition of "Metis" in Upper Great Lakes Ethnohistory." Ethnohistory, 58. Retrieved from doi:10.1215/00141801-2010-063.
  14. ^ "Racially 'Indian', Legally 'White': The Canadian State's Struggles to Categorize the Métis, 1850-1900 by Jennifer Hayter (page 85)" (PDF). University of Toronto. 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  15. ^ a b "The controversial rise of the eastern Metis: 'Where were these people all this time?'". cbc.ca. 27 May 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2022. People of mixed blood in the region either integrated into Indigenous communities or assimilated with European newcomers, unlike the distinct Metis People of Louis Riel in Western Canada. "When you're looking at the Maritimes and Quebec, the children of intermarriage were accepted by either party, in our case the Mi'kmaq or the Acadian," Mi'kmaw elder and historian Daniel Paul says. "There was no such thing as a Metis community here in this region."
  16. ^ a b Belcourt, Tony (2013). "For the record... On Métis identity and citizenship within the Métis Nation". Aboriginal Policy Studies. 2 (2).
  17. ^ "Supreme Court Judgements (paragraphs 38 and 10 )". Supreme Court of Canada. 19 September 2003. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  18. ^ "R. v. Laviolette, 2005 SKPC 70". CanLII. 15 July 2005. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  19. ^ "R. v. Belhumeur, 2007 SKPC 114". CanLII. 18 October 2007. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  20. ^ "R. v. Goodon, 2008 MPPC 59". CanLII. 8 January 2009. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  21. ^ "Identification of Historic Métis Communities in Ontario". Ontario Newsroom. 22 August 2017. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  22. ^ Penetanguishene Halfbreed Petition, 27 January 1840. RG-10 Indian Affairs Records, volume 72, reel C-6878. Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
  23. ^ Sault Ste. Marie Petition. RG-1, L3, Vol. 182B, Petitions E Bundle 6, No. 21. Library and Archives Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
  24. ^ "Petition of 1905 For Scrip From The Half Breeds of Moose Factory". Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  25. ^ "Treaty 3 between Her Majesty the Queen and the Saulteaux Tribe of the Ojibbeway Indians at the Northwest Angle on the Lake of the Woods with Adhesionsy". 9 August 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  26. ^ "Governing Structure". Métis Nation of Ontario. 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
  27. ^ "MNO Chartered Community Councils". Métis Nation of Ontario. 2019.
  28. ^ "Métis Nation of Ontario Youth Council". Métis Nation of Ontario. 2019.
  29. ^ "The Provisional Council of the Métis Nation of Ontario (PCMNO)." (2019). Métis Nation of Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.metisnation.org/governance/governing-structure/pcmno/.
  30. ^ "Canada and Métis Nation of Ontario sign updated Métis Self-Government Agreement". Métis Nation of Ontario. 24 February 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
  31. ^ a b "Métis leaders raise concerns about national council, call for reform". thestar.com. 26 January 2020. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
  32. ^ a b Lachance, Miguel; Pilion, Didier (23 August 2019). "Les Métis de l'Ontario tentent de s'entendre au sujet de la gouvernance". Radio-Canada (in Canadian French). Retrieved 5 December 2023. M. Sarrazin fait référence à une résolution du Ralliement national des Métis (RNM), qui exige de la NMO la mise en place d'une définition plus stricte du statut de Métis pour mettre fin à une probation. 'La probation, je m'en fous, car [le Ralliement] n'a aucune autorité sur nous, affirme Mme Picotte.'
  33. ^ Public Health Agency of Canada (12 October 2022). "Immunization Partnership Fund". Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Métis_Nation_of_Ontario&oldid=1262613252"