Content deleted Content added
Cowman109 (talk | contribs)
Wiarthurhu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 183:
 
:::You ''were'' banned from articles on cars and airplanes, and you violated that ban. See the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy]]. This discussion is getting nowhere. If you would like to appeal the ban, prepare an arbitration case here and I will transfer it to the arbitration page, but you won't be unblocked by any other way. And once again, can people stop replying here? This is highly unproductive. There is no need to taunt Wiarthurhu. Thank you. <font color="DarkGreen">[[User:Cowman109|Cowman109]]</font><sup>[[User talk:Cowman109|Talk]]</sup> 20:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 
== Final Last Words ==
 
* Please don't delete this user for at least 3 months to show that I can stick around without damaging anything for at least that long.
* As far as I can tell, putting up fair-use pictures for a movie review of Open Season was the main reason for an indefinite ban, plus a sockpuppet that created the article, but would not be banned for any conduct of that user alone. For my reference, is this the case, or did anybody besides Steve Baker get enraged with my conduct??
* Doesn't violating a ban call for extending the ban rather than a lifetime block?? It does not appear I did any other harmful conduct besides making making a good-faith insertion of a picture with no intent to harm or enrage.
* I'll try the arbitration in 3 months. Right now everybody seems too grouchy to deliver anything resembling fair treatment. --[[User:Wiarthurhu|matador300]] 15:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)