Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/APerson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Reiterate support |
BethNaught (talk | contribs) →Support: fix numbering |
||
Line 125:
#'''Support''' [[:User:KrakatoaKatie|Krakatoa]][[User talk:KrakatoaKatie|<b>Katie</b>]] 23:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Should be a net positive in the areas the candidate intends to work in. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/afdstats/afdstats.py?name=APerson&max=500&startdate=&altname= 91.3% AfD hit rate]. [[User:SSTflyer|sst]]<sup>[[User talk:SSTflyer|flyer]]</sup> 02:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This candidate is too good enough to use the administrative tools, I, as reviewer at AfC are lacking administrator’s actions for such as reviewing deletion tags takes way too long because of lack of administration in that field, I would definitely support this candidate since he has the ability to work in that role. I believe he will be good enough to use the administration tools to make a positive manoeuvre in review process with other reviewers such as myself. <font style="color: rgb(232, 196, 20);">♔</font> <font style="color: rgb(4, 194, 4); background: rgb(249, 250, 233); font-style: italic; font-family: Times New Roman, serif;">[[User:Alpha Monarch|MONARCH]]</font> <small style="background: rgb(249, 250, 233); font-style: italic; font-family: Georgia, serif;">[[User talk:Alpha Monarch|<span style="color: rgb(188, 96, 12);">Talk to me</span>]]</small> 05:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - net positive, and the opposition is weak, as ever. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 09:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
|