Brews ohare

::JohnBlackburne is correct, though I would be very annoyed at anyone who brought an obviously non-substantive edit of the sort as a pretext to sanction you. This doesn't mean that it's okay for you to routinely do such edits, but I don't want you to fear stepping on a landmine every time you make a trivial edit either. — [[User:Coren|Coren]] ^{[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]} 20:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 

I'm afraid that this is getting to be a problem. With [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Free_will&diff=523943389&oldid=523937452 this] talk page contribution you are suggesting adding physics related content to the article [[Free will]]. In my interpretation that is precisely what "broadly construed" means in the topic ban: not just physics articles and their talk pages but physics related content in any article. And this edit is far more substantial and contentious than the earlier change to [[Length measurement]].--<small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small>^{[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]}<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 16:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)