Talk:Attack on Sydney Harbour: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I have noted that the success or failure of the midgets at Pearl Harbor is a matter of dispute, not fact.
Line 463:
:::Yes. I wasn't thinking of detail, but it is an interesting sideline. [[User:Rumiton|Rumiton]] ([[User talk:Rumiton|talk]]) 10:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
::::I see this article still states that the midgets at Pearl had "no effect." Sources say otherwise, but I don't want to make an undiscussed change. Comments? [[User:Rumiton|Rumiton]] ([[User talk:Rumiton|talk]]) 09:25, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 
This entry states as a fact that the midget subs had "no effect" at Pearl Harbor. Since that is not an accepted fact, only the opinion of one group of researchers vs. the opinion of another group of researchers, I think that statement should be removed.
However, to avoid triggering a troll attack, I'll leave it to some member of the inner circle to make the change. ([[Special:Contributions/71.22.47.232|71.22.47.232]] ([[User talk:71.22.47.232|talk]]) 02:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC))
 
 
==Eastern Suburbs bombing==