Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Motion 4: Arbitrator views and discussions: edit addition |
|||
Line 156:
==== Motion 4: Arbitrator views and discussions ====
*Proposing for discussion; thanks to {{U|voorts}} for the idea. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 19:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
*:I am leaning no on this motion. The potential downsides of this plan do seem to outweigh the benefit of being able to compensate a correspondence clerk for what will ultimately likely be something like 5 hours a week at most. And yeah, this does seem to take away a key part of ArbCom's effectiveness. Yes, things like AffCom and the grant committees (which do all receive substantial WMF CST support) are kind of community committees... but they feel ''way'' less like they are run by and answerable to the community than enwiki ArbCom feels to me, and I would not want to push ArbCom in that direction. Best, '''[[User:L235|KevinL]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·''' [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 02:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
=== Community discussion ===
|