Revision as of 05:58, 2 December 2024 edit SportingFlyer (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers 30,545 edits →Controversy over Baidu: comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:00, 2 December 2024 edit undo Jclemens (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 45,401 edits →Controversy over Baidu: o (ec) Next edit →
Line 10: '''Comment'''. Could the page be undeleted for non-admins to review? I don't see any reason that a page about controversies related to a company would automatically be considered an attack page, but I didn't see the content of this particular page. [[User:Dclemens1971\|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talk:Dclemens1971\|talk]]) 05:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC) If an admin could either temp undelete this or confirm it's an attack page that doesn't require undeletion, that would be fantastic. [[User:SportingFlyer\|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer\|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer\|C]]</span>'' 05:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC) *'''Overturn G10''' I don't need to see it, I've disagreed enough with Piotrus in deletion discussions over the years to know that he knows what is and isn't an attack page, so it can go to AfD if someone disagrees. [[User:Jclemens\|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens\|talk]]) 06:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC) ====[[:Rafael de Orleans e Bragança]]====

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 December 2: Difference between revisions