Content deleted Content added
→[[Santa Rosa, California]]: clarity |
→[[Santa Rosa, California]]: intention utterly misunderstood |
||
Line 27:
:Thanks for your reply. As both an editor and an administrator, let me point out that contribution to Wikipedia also includes assisting others in their contributions, both from the standpoint of researching and writing data and of explaining where it fails [[WP:N|notability]]. It is my responsibility, and yours, to ensure that our contributions follow [[WP:V#Burden of evidence|policy]] and not leave behind a (potential) mess and tell others that it's their duty to clean it up. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 21:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
::Then '''you''' misunderstand; correctly marking an entry as violative of encyclopedic policy is neither mocking nor condemning, nor was it intended as such. The template is supposed to '''assist''' editors in the art, as it were, of writing an encyclopedia. <tt style="color:#161;">RadioKirk<small> ([[User:RadioKirk|u]]|[[User talk:RadioKirk|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/RadioKirk|c]])</small></tt> 03:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
| |||