Release: 1.4.54 | Release Date: September 5, 2024

# SQLAlchemy 1.4 Documentation

# Loading Inheritance Hierarchies

When classes are mapped in inheritance hierarchies using the “joined”, “single”, or “concrete” table inheritance styles as described at Mapping Class Inheritance Hierarchies, the usual behavior is that a query for a particular base class will also yield objects corresponding to subclasses as well. When a single query is capable of returning a result with a different class or subclasses per result row, we use the term “polymorphic loading”.

Within the realm of polymorphic loading, specifically with joined and single table inheritance, there is an additional problem of which subclass attributes are to be queried up front, and which are to be loaded later. When an attribute of a particular subclass is queried up front, we can use it in our query as something to filter on, and it also will be loaded when we get our objects back. If it’s not queried up front, it gets loaded later when we first need to access it. Basic control of this behavior is provided using the `with_polymorphic()` function, as well as two variants, the mapper configuration `mapper.with_polymorphic` in conjunction with the `mapper.polymorphic_load` option, and the `Query` -level `Query.with_polymorphic()` method. The “with_polymorphic” family each provide a means of specifying which specific subclasses of a particular base class should be included within a query, which implies what columns and tables will be available in the SELECT.

## Using with_polymorphic

For the following sections, assume the `Employee` / `Engineer` / `Manager` examples introduced in Mapping Class Inheritance Hierarchies.

Normally, when a `Query` specifies the base class of an inheritance hierarchy, only the columns that are local to that base class are queried:

    session.query(Employee).all()

Above, for both single and joined table inheritance, only the columns local to `Employee` will be present in the SELECT. We may get back instances of `Engineer` or `Manager`, however they will not have the additional attributes loaded until we first access them, at which point a lazy load is emitted.

Similarly, if we wanted to refer to columns mapped to `Engineer` or `Manager` in our query that’s against `Employee`, these columns aren’t available directly in either the single or joined table inheritance case, since the `Employee` entity does not refer to these columns (note that for single-table inheritance, this is common if Declarative is used, but not for a classical mapping).

To solve both of these issues, the `with_polymorphic()` function provides a special `AliasedClass` that represents a range of columns across subclasses. This object can be used in a `Query` like any other alias. When queried, it represents all the columns present in the classes given:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import with_polymorphic

    eng_plus_manager = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer, Manager])

    query = session.query(eng_plus_manager)

If the above mapping were using joined table inheritance, the SELECT statement for the above would be:

    query.all()
    SELECT
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        engineer.id AS engineer_id,
        manager.id AS manager_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        engineer.engineer_info AS engineer_engineer_info,
        manager.manager_data AS manager_manager_data
    FROM
        employee
        LEFT OUTER JOIN engineer ON employee.id = engineer.id
        LEFT OUTER JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    []

Where above, the additional tables / columns for “engineer” and “manager” are included. Similar behavior occurs in the case of single table inheritance.

`with_polymorphic()` accepts a single class or mapper, a list of classes/mappers, or the string `'*'` to indicate all subclasses:

    # include columns for Engineer
    entity = with_polymorphic(Employee, Engineer)

    # include columns for Engineer, Manager
    entity = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer, Manager])

    # include columns for all mapped subclasses
    entity = with_polymorphic(Employee, "*")

Tip

It’s important to note that `with_polymorphic()` only affects the columns that are included in fetched rows, and not the types of objects returned. A call to `with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager])` will refer to rows that contain all types of `Employee` objects, including not only `Manager` objects, but also `Engineer` objects as these are subclasses of `Employee`, as well as `Employee` instances if these are present in the database. The effect of using `with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager])` would only provide the behavior that additional columns specific to `Manager` will be eagerly loaded in result rows, and as described below in Referring to Specific Subclass Attributes also be available for use within the WHERE clause of the SELECT statement.

### Using aliasing with with_polymorphic

The `with_polymorphic()` function also provides “aliasing” of the polymorphic selectable itself, meaning, two different `with_polymorphic()` entities, referring to the same class hierarchy, can be used together. This is available using the `with_polymorphic.aliased` flag. For a polymorphic selectable that is across multiple tables, the default behavior is to wrap the selectable into a subquery. Below we emit a query that will select for “employee or manager” paired with “employee or engineer” on employees with the same name:

    engineer_employee = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer], aliased=True)
    manager_employee = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager], aliased=True)

    q = s.query(engineer_employee, manager_employee).join(
        manager_employee,
        and_(
            engineer_employee.id > manager_employee.id,
            engineer_employee.name == manager_employee.name,
        ),
    )
    q.all()
    SELECT
        anon_1.employee_id AS anon_1_employee_id,
        anon_1.employee_name AS anon_1_employee_name,
        anon_1.employee_type AS anon_1_employee_type,
        anon_1.engineer_id AS anon_1_engineer_id,
        anon_1.engineer_engineer_name AS anon_1_engineer_engineer_name,
        anon_2.employee_id AS anon_2_employee_id,
        anon_2.employee_name AS anon_2_employee_name,
        anon_2.employee_type AS anon_2_employee_type,
        anon_2.manager_id AS anon_2_manager_id,
        anon_2.manager_manager_name AS anon_2_manager_manager_name
    FROM (
        SELECT
            employee.id AS employee_id,
            employee.name AS employee_name,
            employee.type AS employee_type,
            engineer.id AS engineer_id,
            engineer.engineer_name AS engineer_engineer_name
        FROM employee
        LEFT OUTER JOIN engineer ON employee.id = engineer.id
    ) AS anon_1
    JOIN (
        SELECT
            employee.id AS employee_id,
            employee.name AS employee_name,
            employee.type AS employee_type,
            manager.id AS manager_id,
             manager.manager_name AS manager_manager_name
        FROM employee
        LEFT OUTER JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    ) AS anon_2
    ON anon_1.employee_id > anon_2.employee_id
    AND anon_1.employee_name = anon_2.employee_name

The creation of subqueries above is very verbose. While it creates the best encapsulation of the two distinct queries, it may be inefficient. `with_polymorphic()` includes an additional flag to help with this situation, `with_polymorphic.flat`, which will “flatten” the subquery / join combination into straight joins, applying aliasing to the individual tables instead. Setting `with_polymorphic.flat` implies `with_polymorphic.aliased`, so only one flag is necessary:

    engineer_employee = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer], flat=True)
    manager_employee = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager], flat=True)

    q = s.query(engineer_employee, manager_employee).join(
        manager_employee,
        and_(
            engineer_employee.id > manager_employee.id,
            engineer_employee.name == manager_employee.name,
        ),
    )
    q.all()
    SELECT
        employee_1.id AS employee_1_id,
        employee_1.name AS employee_1_name,
        employee_1.type AS employee_1_type,
        engineer_1.id AS engineer_1_id,
        engineer_1.engineer_name AS engineer_1_engineer_name,
        employee_2.id AS employee_2_id,
        employee_2.name AS employee_2_name,
        employee_2.type AS employee_2_type,
        manager_1.id AS manager_1_id,
        manager_1.manager_name AS manager_1_manager_name
    FROM employee AS employee_1
    LEFT OUTER JOIN engineer AS engineer_1
    ON employee_1.id = engineer_1.id
    JOIN (
        employee AS employee_2
        LEFT OUTER JOIN manager AS manager_1
        ON employee_2.id = manager_1.id
    )
    ON employee_1.id > employee_2.id
    AND employee_1.name = employee_2.name

Note above, when using `with_polymorphic.flat`, it is often the case when used in conjunction with joined table inheritance that we get a right-nested JOIN in our statement. Some older databases, in particular older versions of SQLite, may have a problem with this syntax, although virtually all modern database versions now support this syntax.

Note

The `with_polymorphic.flat` flag only applies to the use of `with_polymorphic` with joined table inheritance and when the `with_polymorphic.selectable` argument is not used.

### Referring to Specific Subclass Attributes

The entity returned by `with_polymorphic()` is an `AliasedClass` object, which can be used in a `Query` like any other alias, including named attributes for those attributes on the `Employee` class. In our previous example, `eng_plus_manager` becomes the entity that we use to refer to the three-way outer join above. It also includes namespaces for each class named in the list of classes, so that attributes specific to those subclasses can be called upon as well. The following example illustrates calling upon attributes specific to `Engineer` as well as `Manager` in terms of `eng_plus_manager`:

    eng_plus_manager = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer, Manager])
    query = session.query(eng_plus_manager).filter(
        or_(
            eng_plus_manager.Engineer.engineer_info == "x",
            eng_plus_manager.Manager.manager_data == "y",
        )
    )

A query as above would generate SQL resembling the following:

    query.all()
    SELECT
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        engineer.id AS engineer_id,
        manager.id AS manager_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        engineer.engineer_info AS engineer_engineer_info,
        manager.manager_data AS manager_manager_data
    FROM
        employee
        LEFT OUTER JOIN engineer ON employee.id = engineer.id
        LEFT OUTER JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    WHERE
      engineer.engineer_info=? OR
      manager.manager_data=?
    ['x', 'y']

### Setting with_polymorphic at mapper configuration time

The `with_polymorphic()` function serves the purpose of allowing “eager” loading of attributes from subclass tables, as well as the ability to refer to the attributes from subclass tables at query time. Historically, the “eager loading” of columns has been the more important part of the equation. So just as eager loading for relationships can be specified as a configurational option, the `mapper.with_polymorphic` configuration parameter allows an entity to use a polymorphic load by default. We can add the parameter to our `Employee` mapping first introduced at Joined Table Inheritance:

    class Employee(Base):
        __tablename__ = "employee"
        id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
        name = Column(String(50))
        type = Column(String(50))

        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_identity": "employee",
            "polymorphic_on": type,
            "with_polymorphic": "*",
        }

Above is a common setting for `mapper.with_polymorphic`, which is to indicate an asterisk to load all subclass columns. In the case of joined table inheritance, this option should be used sparingly, as it implies that the mapping will always emit a (often large) series of LEFT OUTER JOIN to many tables, which is not efficient from a SQL perspective. For single table inheritance, specifying the asterisk is often a good idea as the load is still against a single table only, but an additional lazy load of subclass-mapped columns will be prevented.

Using `with_polymorphic()` or `Query.with_polymorphic()` will override the mapper-level `mapper.with_polymorphic` setting.

The `mapper.with_polymorphic` option also accepts a list of classes just like `with_polymorphic()` to polymorphically load among a subset of classes. However, when using Declarative, providing classes to this list is not directly possible as the subclasses we’d like to add are not available yet. Instead, we can specify on each subclass that they should individually participate in polymorphic loading by default using the `mapper.polymorphic_load` parameter:

    class Engineer(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "engineer"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        engineer_info = Column(String(50))
        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "engineer", "polymorphic_load": "inline"}

    class Manager(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "manager"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        manager_data = Column(String(50))
        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "manager", "polymorphic_load": "inline"}

Setting the `mapper.polymorphic_load` parameter to the value `"inline"` means that the `Engineer` and `Manager` classes above are part of the “polymorphic load” of the base `Employee` class by default, exactly as though they had been appended to the `mapper.with_polymorphic` list of classes.

### Setting with_polymorphic against a query

The `with_polymorphic()` function evolved from a query-level method `Query.with_polymorphic()`. This method has the same purpose as `with_polymorphic()`, except is not as flexible in its usage patterns in that it only applies to the first entity of the `Query`. It then takes effect for all occurrences of that entity, so that the entity (and its subclasses) can be referred to directly, rather than using an alias object. For simple cases it might be considered to be more succinct:

    session.query(Employee).with_polymorphic([Engineer, Manager]).filter(
        or_(Engineer.engineer_info == "w", Manager.manager_data == "q")
    )

The `Query.with_polymorphic()` method has a more complicated job than the `with_polymorphic()` function, as it needs to correctly transform entities like `Engineer` and `Manager` appropriately, but not interfere with other entities. If its flexibility is lacking, switch to using `with_polymorphic()`.

## Polymorphic Selectin Loading

An alternative to using the `with_polymorphic()` family of functions to “eagerly” load the additional subclasses on an inheritance mapping, primarily when using joined table inheritance, is to use polymorphic “selectin” loading. This is an eager loading feature which works similarly to the Select IN loading feature of relationship loading. Given our example mapping, we can instruct a load of `Employee` to emit an extra SELECT per subclass by using the `selectin_polymorphic()` loader option:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import selectin_polymorphic

    query = session.query(Employee).options(
        selectin_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager, Engineer])
    )

When the above query is run, two additional SELECT statements will be emitted:

    query.all()
    SELECT
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type
    FROM employee
    ()

    SELECT
        engineer.id AS engineer_id,
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        engineer.engineer_name AS engineer_engineer_name
    FROM employee JOIN engineer ON employee.id = engineer.id
    WHERE employee.id IN (?, ?) ORDER BY employee.id
    (1, 2)

    SELECT
        manager.id AS manager_id,
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        manager.manager_name AS manager_manager_name
    FROM employee JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    WHERE employee.id IN (?) ORDER BY employee.id
    (3,)

We can similarly establish the above style of loading to take place by default by specifying the `mapper.polymorphic_load` parameter, using the value `"selectin"` on a per-subclass basis:

    class Employee(Base):
        __tablename__ = "employee"
        id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
        name = Column(String(50))
        type = Column(String(50))

        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "employee", "polymorphic_on": type}

    class Engineer(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "engineer"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        engineer_name = Column(String(30))

        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_load": "selectin",
            "polymorphic_identity": "engineer",
        }

    class Manager(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "manager"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        manager_name = Column(String(30))

        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_load": "selectin",
            "polymorphic_identity": "manager",
        }

Unlike when using `with_polymorphic()`, when using the `selectin_polymorphic()` style of loading, we do not have the ability to refer to the `Engineer` or `Manager` entities within our main query as filter, order by, or other criteria, as these entities are not present in the initial query that is used to locate results. However, we can apply loader options that apply towards `Engineer` or `Manager`, which will take effect when the secondary SELECT is emitted. Below we assume `Manager` has an additional relationship `Manager.paperwork`, that we’d like to eagerly load as well. We can use any type of eager loading, such as joined eager loading via the `joinedload()` function:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import joinedload
    from sqlalchemy.orm import selectin_polymorphic

    query = session.query(Employee).options(
        selectin_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager, Engineer]), joinedload(Manager.paperwork)
    )

Using the query above, we get three SELECT statements emitted, however the one against `Manager` will be:

    SELECT
        manager.id AS manager_id,
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        manager.manager_name AS manager_manager_name,
        paperwork_1.id AS paperwork_1_id,
        paperwork_1.manager_id AS paperwork_1_manager_id,
        paperwork_1.data AS paperwork_1_data
    FROM employee JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    LEFT OUTER JOIN paperwork AS paperwork_1
    ON manager.id = paperwork_1.manager_id
    WHERE employee.id IN (?) ORDER BY employee.id
    (3,)

Note that selectin polymorphic loading has similar caveats as that of selectin relationship loading; for entities that make use of a composite primary key, the database in use must support tuples with “IN”, currently known to work with MySQL and PostgreSQL.

Added in version 1.2.

Warning

The selectin polymorphic loading feature should be considered as experimental within early releases of the 1.2 series.

### Combining selectin and with_polymorphic

Note

works as of 1.2.0b3

With careful planning, selectin loading can be applied against a hierarchy that itself uses “with_polymorphic”. A particular use case is that of using selectin loading to load a joined-inheritance subtable, which then uses “with_polymorphic” to refer to further sub-classes, which may be joined- or single-table inheritance. If we added a class `VicePresident` that extends `Manager` using single-table inheritance, we could ensure that a load of `Manager` also fully loads `VicePresident` subtypes at the same time:

    # use "Employee" example from the enclosing section

    class Manager(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "manager"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        manager_name = Column(String(30))

        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_load": "selectin",
            "polymorphic_identity": "manager",
        }

    class VicePresident(Manager):
        vp_info = Column(String(30))

        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_load": "inline", "polymorphic_identity": "vp"}

Above, we add a `vp_info` column to the `manager` table, local to the `VicePresident` subclass. This subclass is linked to the polymorphic identity `"vp"` which refers to rows which have this data. By setting the load style to “inline”, it means that a load of `Manager` objects will also ensure that the `vp_info` column is queried for in the same SELECT statement. A query against `Employee` that encounters a `Manager` row would emit similarly to the following:

    SELECT employee.id AS employee_id, employee.name AS employee_name,
           employee.type AS employee_type
    FROM employee
    )

    SELECT manager.id AS manager_id, employee.id AS employee_id,
           employee.type AS employee_type,
           manager.manager_name AS manager_manager_name,
           manager.vp_info AS manager_vp_info
    FROM employee JOIN manager ON employee.id = manager.id
    WHERE employee.id IN (?) ORDER BY employee.id
    (1,)

Combining “selectin” polymorphic loading with query-time `with_polymorphic()` usage is also possible (though this is very outer-space stuff!); assuming the above mappings had no `polymorphic_load` set up, we could get the same result as follows:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import with_polymorphic, selectin_polymorphic

    manager_poly = with_polymorphic(Manager, [VicePresident])

    s.query(Employee).options(selectin_polymorphic(Employee, [manager_poly])).all()

## Referring to specific subtypes on relationships

Mapped attributes which correspond to a `relationship()` are used in querying in order to refer to the linkage between two mappings. Common uses for this are to refer to a `relationship()` in `Query.join()` as well as in loader options like `joinedload()`. When using `relationship()` where the target class is an inheritance hierarchy, the API allows that the join, eager load, or other linkage should target a specific subclass, alias, or `with_polymorphic()` alias, of that class hierarchy, rather than the class directly targeted by the `relationship()`.

The `of_type()` method allows the construction of joins along `relationship()` paths while narrowing the criterion to specific derived aliases or subclasses. Suppose the `employees` table represents a collection of employees which are associated with a `Company` object. We’ll add a `company_id` column to the `employees` table and a new table `companies`:

    class Company(Base):
        __tablename__ = "company"
        id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
        name = Column(String(50))
        employees = relationship("Employee", backref="company")

    class Employee(Base):
        __tablename__ = "employee"
        id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
        type = Column(String(20))
        company_id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("company.id"))
        __mapper_args__ = {
            "polymorphic_on": type,
            "polymorphic_identity": "employee",
        }

    class Engineer(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "engineer"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        engineer_info = Column(String(50))
        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "engineer"}

    class Manager(Employee):
        __tablename__ = "manager"
        id = Column(Integer, ForeignKey("employee.id"), primary_key=True)
        manager_data = Column(String(50))
        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "manager"}

When querying from `Company` onto the `Employee` relationship, the `Query.join()` method as well as operators like `PropComparator.any()` and `PropComparator.has()` will create a join from `company` to `employee`, without including `engineer` or `manager` in the mix. If we wish to have criterion which is specifically against the `Engineer` class, we can tell those methods to join or subquery against the set of columns representing the subclass using the `PropComparator.of_type()` operator:

    session.query(Company).join(Company.employees.of_type(Engineer)).filter(
        Engineer.engineer_info == "someinfo"
    )

Similarly, to join from `Company` to the polymorphic entity that includes both `Engineer` and `Manager` columns:

    manager_and_engineer = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager, Engineer])

    session.query(Company).join(Company.employees.of_type(manager_and_engineer)).filter(
        or_(
            manager_and_engineer.Engineer.engineer_info == "someinfo",
            manager_and_engineer.Manager.manager_data == "somedata",
        )
    )

The `PropComparator.any()` and `PropComparator.has()` operators also can be used with `of_type()`, such as when the embedded criterion is in terms of a subclass:

    session.query(Company).filter(
        Company.employees.of_type(Engineer).any(Engineer.engineer_info == "someinfo")
    ).all()

### Eager Loading of Specific or Polymorphic Subtypes

The `joinedload()`, `subqueryload()`, `contains_eager()` and other eagerloader options support paths which make use of `of_type()`. Below, we load `Company` rows while eagerly loading related `Engineer` objects, querying the `employee` and `engineer` tables simultaneously:

    session.query(Company).\
        options(
            subqueryload(Company.employees.of_type(Engineer)).
            subqueryload(Engineer.machines)
            )
        )

As is the case with `Query.join()`, `PropComparator.of_type()` can be used to combine eager loading and `with_polymorphic()`, so that all sub-attributes of all referenced subtypes can be loaded:

    manager_and_engineer = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Manager, Engineer], flat=True)

    session.query(Company).options(
        joinedload(Company.employees.of_type(manager_and_engineer))
    )

Note

When using `with_polymorphic()` in conjunction with `joinedload()`, the `with_polymorphic()` object must be against an “aliased” object, that is an instance of `Alias`, so that the polymorphic selectable is aliased (an informative error message is raised otherwise).

The typical way to do this is to include the `with_polymorphic.aliased` or `flat` flag, which will apply this aliasing automatically. However, if the `with_polymorphic.selectable` argument is being used to pass an object that is already an `Alias` object then this flag should not be set. The “flat” option implies the “aliased” option and is an alternate form of aliasing against join objects that produces fewer subqueries.

Once `PropComparator.of_type()` is the target of the eager load, that’s the entity we would use for subsequent chaining, not the original class or derived class. If we wanted to further eager load a collection on the eager-loaded `Engineer` class, we access this class from the namespace of the `with_polymorphic()` object:

    session.query(Company).\
        options(
            joinedload(Company.employees.of_type(manager_and_engineer)).\
            subqueryload(manager_and_engineer.Engineer.computers)
            )
        )

## Loading objects with joined table inheritance

When using joined table inheritance, if we query for a specific subclass that represents a JOIN of two tables such as our `Engineer` example from the inheritance section, the SQL emitted is a join:

    session.query(Engineer).all()

The above query will emit SQL like:

    SELECT employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name, employee.type AS employee_type,
        engineer.name AS engineer_name
    FROM employee JOIN engineer
    ON employee.id = engineer.id

We will then get a collection of `Engineer` objects back, which will contain all columns from `employee` and `engineer` loaded.

However, when emitting a `Query` against a base class, the behavior is to load only from the base table:

    session.query(Employee).all()

Above, the default behavior would be to SELECT only from the `employee` table and not from any “sub” tables (`engineer` and `manager`, in our previous examples):

    SELECT employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name, employee.type AS employee_type
    FROM employee
    []

After a collection of `Employee` objects has been returned from the query, and as attributes are requested from those `Employee` objects which are represented in either the `engineer` or `manager` child tables, a second load is issued for the columns in that related row, if the data was not already loaded. So above, after accessing the objects you’d see further SQL issued along the lines of:

    SELECT manager.id AS manager_id,
        manager.manager_data AS manager_manager_data
    FROM manager
    WHERE ? = manager.id
    [5]
    SELECT engineer.id AS engineer_id,
        engineer.engineer_info AS engineer_engineer_info
    FROM engineer
    WHERE ? = engineer.id
    [2]

The `with_polymorphic()` function and related configuration options allow us to instead emit a JOIN up front which will conditionally load against `employee`, `engineer`, or `manager`, very much like joined eager loading works for relationships, removing the necessity for a second per-entity load:

    from sqlalchemy.orm import with_polymorphic

    eng_plus_manager = with_polymorphic(Employee, [Engineer, Manager])

    query = session.query(eng_plus_manager)

The above produces a query which joins the `employee` table to both the `engineer` and `manager` tables like the following:

    query.all()
    SELECT employee.id AS employee_id,
        engineer.id AS engineer_id,
        manager.id AS manager_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        engineer.engineer_info AS engineer_engineer_info,
        manager.manager_data AS manager_manager_data
    FROM employee
        LEFT OUTER JOIN engineer
        ON employee.id = engineer.id
        LEFT OUTER JOIN manager
        ON employee.id = manager.id
    []

The section Using with_polymorphic discusses the `with_polymorphic()` function and its configurational variants.

See also

Using with_polymorphic

## Loading objects with single table inheritance

In modern Declarative, single inheritance mappings produce `Column` objects that are mapped only to a subclass, and not available from the superclass, even though they are present on the same table. In our example from Single Table Inheritance, the `Manager` mapping for example had a `Column` specified:

    class Manager(Employee):
        manager_data = Column(String(50))

        __mapper_args__ = {"polymorphic_identity": "manager"}

Above, there would be no `Employee.manager_data` attribute, even though the `employee` table has a `manager_data` column. A query against `Manager` will include this column in the query, as well as an IN clause to limit rows only to `Manager` objects:

    session.query(Manager).all()
    SELECT
        employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        employee.manager_data AS employee_manager_data
    FROM employee
    WHERE employee.type IN (?)

    ('manager',)

However, in a similar way to that of joined table inheritance, a query against `Employee` will only query for columns mapped to `Employee`:

    session.query(Employee).all()
    SELECT employee.id AS employee_id,
        employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type
    FROM employee

If we get back an instance of `Manager` from our result, accessing additional columns only mapped to `Manager` emits a lazy load for those columns, in a similar way to joined inheritance:

    SELECT employee.manager_data AS employee_manager_data
    FROM employee
    WHERE employee.id = ? AND employee.type IN (?)

The `with_polymorphic()` function serves a similar role as joined inheritance in the case of single inheritance; it allows both for eager loading of subclass attributes as well as specification of subclasses in a query, just without the overhead of using OUTER JOIN:

    employee_poly = with_polymorphic(Employee, "*")

    q = session.query(employee_poly).filter(
        or_(employee_poly.name == "a", employee_poly.Manager.manager_data == "b")
    )

Above, our query remains against a single table however we can refer to the columns present in `Manager` or `Engineer` using the “polymorphic” namespace. Since we specified `"*"` for the entities, both `Engineer` and `Manager` will be loaded at once. SQL emitted would be:

    q.all()
    SELECT
        employee.id AS employee_id, employee.name AS employee_name,
        employee.type AS employee_type,
        employee.manager_data AS employee_manager_data,
        employee.engineer_info AS employee_engineer_info
    FROM employee
    WHERE employee.name = :name_1
    OR employee.manager_data = :manager_data_1

## Inheritance Loading API

Object Name | Description
--- | ---
selectin_polymorphic(base_cls, classes) | Indicate an eager load should take place for all attributes specific to a subclass.
with_polymorphic(base, classes[, selectable, flat, ...]) | Produce an `AliasedClass` construct which specifies columns for descendant mappers of the given base.

function sqlalchemy.orm.with_polymorphic(base, classes, selectable=False, flat=False, polymorphic_on=None, aliased=False, adapt_on_names=False, innerjoin=False, _use_mapper_path=False, _existing_alias=None)

  Produce an `AliasedClass` construct which specifies columns for descendant mappers of the given base.

  Using this method will ensure that each descendant mapper’s tables are included in the FROM clause, and will allow filter() criterion to be used against those tables. The resulting instances will also have those columns already loaded so that no “post fetch” of those columns will be required.

  See also

  Using with_polymorphic - full discussion of `with_polymorphic()`.

  Parameters:

    - base – Base class to be aliased.

    - classes – a single class or mapper, or list of class/mappers, which inherit from the base class. Alternatively, it may also be the string `'*'`, in which case all descending mapped classes will be added to the FROM clause.

    - aliased – when True, the selectable will be aliased. For a JOIN, this means the JOIN will be SELECTed from inside of a subquery unless the `with_polymorphic.flat` flag is set to True, which is recommended for simpler use cases.

    - flat – Boolean, will be passed through to the `FromClause.alias()` call so that aliases of `Join` objects will alias the individual tables inside the join, rather than creating a subquery. This is generally supported by all modern databases with regards to right-nested joins and generally produces more efficient queries. Setting this flag is recommended as long as the resulting SQL is functional.

    - selectable –

      a table or subquery that will be used in place of the generated FROM clause. This argument is required if any of the desired classes use concrete table inheritance, since SQLAlchemy currently cannot generate UNIONs among tables automatically. If used, the `selectable` argument must represent the full set of tables and columns mapped by every mapped class. Otherwise, the unaccounted mapped columns will result in their table being appended directly to the FROM clause which will usually lead to incorrect results.

      When left at its default value of `False`, the polymorphic selectable assigned to the base mapper is used for selecting rows. However, it may also be passed as `None`, which will bypass the configured polymorphic selectable and instead construct an ad-hoc selectable for the target classes given; for joined table inheritance this will be a join that includes all target mappers and their subclasses.

    - polymorphic_on – a column to be used as the “discriminator” column for the given selectable. If not given, the polymorphic_on attribute of the base classes’ mapper will be used, if any. This is useful for mappings that don’t have polymorphic loading behavior by default.

    - innerjoin – if True, an INNER JOIN will be used. This should only be specified if querying for one specific subtype only

    - adapt_on_names –

      Passes through the `aliased.adapt_on_names` parameter to the aliased object. This may be useful in situations where the given selectable is not directly related to the existing mapped selectable.

      Added in version 1.4.33.

function sqlalchemy.orm.selectin_polymorphic(base_cls, classes)

  Indicate an eager load should take place for all attributes specific to a subclass.

  This uses an additional SELECT with IN against all matched primary key values, and is the per-query analogue to the `"selectin"` setting on the `mapper.polymorphic_load` parameter.

  Added in version 1.2.

  See also

  Polymorphic Selectin Loading