User talk:Isderion

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Isderion!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
  • For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Notice of namespace-rename "Image" -> "File"

[edit]

Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".

I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).

Please check and replace all occurrences of

wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"

with

wgNamespaceNumber == 6

to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaman - Ritual.jpg

[edit]

Hey man, sorry, but that file already exists in the English Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritual_(album) ). I was just trying to use the same file on the Portuguese Wikipedia ( http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritual_(%C3%A1lbum) )... User:Jcursiolf

Hi Jcursiolf,
as you can see on the file description page there (en:File:Shaman ritual.jpg) the image is used there under the fair use clause. But fair use isn't allowed on Commons, see Commons:Licensing#Material_under_the_fair_use_clause_is_not_allowed_on_Commons. I suggest you read Commons:Licensing before you upload other pictures. --Isderion (talk) 22:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some rights reserved

[edit]

Images were uploaded under Creative Commons. The photos also had tags stating that some rights were reserved. Tarysky (talk) 15:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proper upload under CC looks that way. Can you see the link on the cc-site on the right. Look at http://www.flickr.com/help/photos/#87 for deatils. --Isderion (talk) 22:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hochladen

[edit]

Hallo Isderion,

ich wollte gerade eine Datei hochladen. Doch beim Durchsuchen finde ich:Chrome,components, default usw. Damit habe ich gar nichts zu tun. Aber ich finde nicht meine Festplatte! Siehst Du bitte mal nach, was dort nicht stimmt? Danke und liebe Grüße --Heidi (talk) 10:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Heidi,
sorry, ich bin zur Zeit recht selten hier oder auf Wikipedia unterwegs (verliert irgendwie auch seinen Reiz :)) und kann deine Frage gerade nicht ein- bzw. zuordnen. Deinen PC kann ich natürlich auch nicht anschauen, wir kennen uns im wirklichen Leben ja gar nicht... Trotzdem viele Grüße --Isderion (talk) 00:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I have just posted a question on Commons talk:Photographs of identifiable people, regarding the list where Consent of the subject (who is a non-public figure) is required even for photographs taken in public places in the following countries. I think you may be able to provide relevant and valuable input, and kindly requests that you comment there. --Henrik (heb: Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 06:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Isderion!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VP-Ankündigung

[edit]

Hallo Isderion, du hattest deine VP-Ankündung der noch in Bau befindlichen We-miss-you-Seite sicher gut gemeint. Aber das Ergebnis ist leider, dass Obertroll Penyulap, dessen offenkundig einziger Daseinszweck auf Commons die größtmögliche Störung des Projekts ist, die Seite bereits jetzt missbraucht, um dort die angeblichen "Opfer der schlimmen Verhältnisse auf Commons" zu präsentieren[1],[2], als deren Rächer er sich gerne aufspielt. Dazu brauchen wir keine eigene Seite auf Commons, das bieten schon die Kritikerforen wikipediocracy & Co. Ich werde die Seite, die ich als eine positive Erinnerungsseite geplant hatte, wohl wieder löschen. (der Seiteninhalt samt deiner beiden Einträge habe ich in meinen BNR kopiert) Die hiesige Community, sofern überhaupt existent, ist offenbar noch nicht reif genug dafür. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio,
ich bin doch negativ überrascht, dass eine Seite an deren Inhalt ich einen deutlichen Anteil hatte, einfach so gelöscht wird. Das Inklusionskriterien für solche Seiten bzw. die Präsentation des Grundes des Weggangs ein Streitpunkt sein können ist zudem nicht commons-spezifisch (siehe beispielsweise de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Vermisste Wikipedianer#Persönliche Befindlichkeiten auf dieser Seite oder de:Wikipedia Diskussion:Vermisste Wikipedianer#Vermisst?) und durchaus lösbar (wie gesagt klappt ja auch auf de.wp und da gibt's ja auch einige Trolle (wie immer die man definiert)). Gestern hatte ich nur noch gesehen, dass Penyulap einen Platzhalter-Eintrag angelegt hatte und fand das ein wenig seltsam und hatte vor, heute was dazu zu schreiben... Aber aus den Handlungen eines einzelnen Benutzers zu schlussfolgern, dass die Community noch nicht bereit sei, halte ich für überfrüht. Da du Underconstruction wieder eingesetzt hast, hattest du für die Seite noch etwas geplant? --Isderion (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We miss you

[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:We_miss_you&diff=98398776&oldid=98397521 – Why can't the little people on Commons be added to the list? Aren't they important? Don't they deserve love and appreciation? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Michaeldsuarez,
of course also little people deserve love and appreciation. But I think in this case you miss the point because in order to miss somebody you have to know that person. But with the time Mistress Selina Kyle spend editing on Commons she did not give the community the opportunity to get to know her. If you disagree I encourage you to bring the matter up on the appropriate talk page. --Isderion (talk) 02:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I rather not not make a big deal out of it, especially after Multichill blocked Penyulap due to a dispute regarding that page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

[edit]

Thanks, Isderion, for your job in renaming my files [3] (my absent-mindedness :) ).--Vilensija (talk) 05:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome --Isderion (talk) 23:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback Revoked + Warning

[edit]

Isderion, your recent reverts of Canoe1967's talk page posts here and here are not only inappropriate, but also constitute a blatant abuse of the rollback tool. I'm aware that you and Canoe have disagreed in the past, but it is highly inappropriate to use this powerful tool (granted to trustworthy users for the sole purpose of fighting vandalism) against other established editors. Furthermore, I'm highly disappointed to see that you tried to turn a barnstar (For the record, I awarded it to Canoe for reasons completely unrelated to Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Non-free graffiti) recognizing Canoe's positive contributions to the project, into something negative because you disagree with him. This is considered harassment (a very blockable offense) and is not tolerated on Commons, which really isn't something I should have to remind you of. That said, for your sake, I suggest you drop the stick and avoid Canoe for the time being: edits like this and this DR are vengeful in nature and do nothing to help your cause. In the meantime, I will also be reminding Canoe to stay mellow and avoid you as well. As for the fate of Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Non-free graffiti, I will not be changing my decision on the matter. You may try COM:UD if you wish, though it is likely the community will arrive at the same conclusion. Regards, FASTILY 10:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Champlay-FR-45-Le Grand Longeron-23.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

François GOGLINS (talk) 17:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Isderion, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

[edit]
Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression injustifié de photos

[edit]

Cher collègue de Wikipedia; Ma photo a été récemment supprimée pour "problèmes de droits d'auteur"

Concernant la photographie, il n'y a aucun problème avec des droits d'auteurs, puisque je suis l'auteur de la photo. Merci de bien vouloir arrêter de supprimer arbitrairement mes contributions, la réflexion me semble essentielle avant de prendre de pareilles décisions. Si toutefois le problème est autre, je vous invite à me le décrire afin que je puisse comprendre et ne plus recommencer. Vous comprendrez ma déception de voir une suppression d'une contribution cordiale et volontaire sans une once de justification.

~~

please see Commons:Derivative works --Isderion (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. For old situation commons have this map: File:LPR in Ukraine.svg. LPR controlled new nord territories (МИД ЛНР), official map. If you wish, replace map in articles, not commons. Машъал (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
apart from the fact that there are not really "official maps" in this regard, have you read and understood Commons:Overwriting existing files? --Isderion (talk) 21:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Overwriting existing files#Files with current data & examples. Машъал (talk) 23:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi to both of you; I have protected the file for a day because of the ongoing editwar. As this file was unchanged from 2016 to 2022 and you added the {{Current}} tag only now on 8 March when you wished to change the file, I think it might be better to keep that file as the unchanged historical one and create a new one for continuous updating, if necessary. I would propose to remove the {{Current}} template after the protection has run out. For transparency, I was made aware of this case here (in German). Gestumblindi (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]