File:Journée Wikipédia, objet scientifique 2013 Alexandre Hocquet3.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Original file (3,550 × 2,880 pixels, file size: 849 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
Description
Français : Alexandre Hocquet, professeur à l’Université de Lorraine, venu parler de « Wikipédia en tant que forum : une analyse ethnographique de la production d’articles » durant la Journée d’étude  : « Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié », organisée par le « Projet exploratoire » WEUSC ; 5 juin 2013 à l’Institut des sciences de la communication du CNRS (ISCC, Paris). -> 1) Quels usages actuels et potentiels de Wikipédia dans les domaines des sciences, de l’éducation et de la documentation ; 2) point sur les méthodologies et les travaux d’évaluation des connaissances sur Wikipédia ; propositions de nouvelles approches d’expertises par la recherche dans un contexte interdisciplinaire.
Objet de la journée : analyser les rapports que scientifiques et sciences entretiennent avec Wikipédia autour de 3 problématiques :

1. place de l’expertise et celle du chercheur-contributeur ou expert dans Wikipédia ; 2. gouvernance de Wikipédia, de ses régimes d’édition, de ses enjeux de neutralité, de ses sources ;

3. Wikipédia comme objet de recherche, de corpus ou terrain d’analyse
English: Alexander Hocquet, professor at the University of Lorraine (France), came to speek about " Wikipedia as a forum: an ethnographic analysis of the production of goods. " during the Study Day "Wikipedia, unidentified scientific object" June 5, 2013 - Institute of Communication Sciences of the CNRS (ISCC, Paris), organized by the "Pathfinder Project" WEUSC -> 1) What current and potential uses of Wikipedia in the fields of science, education and documentation, 2) review the methodologies and assessment work on Wikipedia knowledge, proposals for new approaches expertise through research in an interdisciplinary context.
Subject of the day: analyze reports that scientists and science have with Wikipedia

around three issues: 1. up expertise and that of the researcher or expert contributor to Wikipedia; 2. Wikipedia governance, its publishing systems, its issues of neutrality, its sources;

3. Wikipedia as a research subject, or field of corpus analysis.
Date
Source Own work
Author Lamiot

Licensing

[edit]
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current21:46, 7 June 2013Thumbnail for version as of 21:46, 7 June 20133,550 × 2,880 (849 KB)Lamiot (talk | contribs)User created page with UploadWizard

The following page uses this file:

File usage on other wikis

The following other wikis use this file:

Metadata