This specific page is the requests page for the Illustration Workshop. Anyone can make a request for an illustration to be created or improved. The standard format for making a request is shown below, along with general advice, and should be followed.
Make a request
Show manual procedures
Use the following template when making a new request, replacing the examples with your image(s) and request(s):
<gallery>
IMAGENAME.EXT|Description of image
IMAGE#TWO.EXT|2nd image (If there is one)
ETCETCETC.EXT|Don't request too many at once, though
</gallery>
;Request:
: Details of your request go here… --~~~~
;Graphist opinion(s):
SpBotarchives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 60 days. For the archive overview, see /Archive. The latest archive is located at /Archive/2024.
Could someone please create SVG files of the above proposals for the flag of Norway from 1821. More information on them can be seen on this page here. Thanks. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@En rouge: Given the lack of sources (or indeed responses) from the other User, I think it may be best to proceed with adding the extra symbols to the flags in the best way you see fit yourself. If you're still up for it of course? Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 18:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1 request is a restore of the old version of incorrect flag [1] sources:[2][3][4]Done
2 request is the addition of the Mir standard [5], which also requires an emblem.
I have not found a reliable source with the correct image of the coat of arms, but it was certainly a lion holding flag, with a ribbon on the mast with the word Hunza state and inscription above the flag [6][7], most likely no formal draft exists.
standard name ,,Flag of Mir of Hunza``
coat of arms name ,,Emblem of Hunza (Kanjut)``
213.192.68.53 12.7.2021
Graphist opinion(s)
Emblem of Bombay State, Vindhya Pradesh and Goa, Daman and Diu
I think it would be nice to have standardized vector images for the three common linear patterns of the skin (i.e., Langer's lines, Blaschko's lines, and dermatomes). This article has diagrams of all three of them, but you may want to look at several images for each because there's some variability between different representations.
As far as the styles of the illustrations, the format of side-by-side anterior and posterior views is the most common.
From a scientific standpoint, one important consideration to remember is that Langer's lines represent a vector field of skin tension, while Blaschko's lines and dermatomes are used to demarcate particular segments of skin. In other words, for Langer's lines, the lines themselves are what's important, while for Blaschko's lines and dermatomes, it's the segments of skin between the lines that are important. This should influence the choice of coloring style. I think it's going to be too complicated to accurately color Langer's lines and I haven't found any images attempting it, so those don't need to be colored. For the other two, the segments should be colored (we don't even technically need lines between them if the contrast between the colors is enough to see the boundaries between the segments, but I'll defer to your judgement on that). The unique thing about Blaschko's lines is that they have a directionality to them, from back to front (i.e., wrapping around from spine to navel), from medial to lateral (shoulders to fingers) and from top to bottom (hips to toes). The image here may show the directionality a bit better for the legs. I'm not sure what the best way to show the directionality of the segments will be, but perhaps shading them so the beginning is more saturated than the end. Dermatomes should be filled with color according to the level of the nerves innervating them, as shown here.
Request taken by --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply] @Rob Hurt: I will really need your help all the way here. So you want three different images each representing different lines; Langer's lines, Blaschko's lines, and dermatomes. So first we will have to find a body illustration that can be used for them all. After that I will check more into each and will for sure have questions. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: No problem. Yes, let's do three separate images. I think that image is good, but it might be nice to have one with feet pointed down so you can see the top and bottom, and with no hair on the head. There are a few sex differences, but let's use a gender-neutral body for simplicity. Rob Hurt (talk) 18:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Will it not be hard to have gender-neutral body when doing Langer's lines (haven't checked for the others), to my understand they are following the topographic of a body.
I have started to make SVG version of this file:Human Body.jpg because I thought we could do both woman and man, I know it's more work but will it not be better?
@Goran tek-en: I would be ok with doing either both or gender neutral. In all cases, I'm remembering that these don't need to have the accuracy of a medical textbook, but are more for the public to get a general understanding of the concepts. So I would be inclined to air on the side of simplicity and interpretability even at the cost of some accuracy, but that's just my opinion. And yes, floating in the air like here. --Rob Hurt (talk) 21:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt: Before I continue I want to check how you want the bodies to look. One is lines and one is shaded for the volume (I know, too much details.) Tell me which you want or maybe both because ones I have made the bodies and the three different lines it's quite easy to move between the two versions.
@Goran tek-en: I think these look good, and the shaded one perhaps looks a bit more professional, as long as those colors don't end up conflicting with the colors used for the skin lines. I'm in favor of making the illustrations look professional though. Do you have the back of the body too? --Rob Hurt (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt: Thanks, yes I have back and front back of male also. I will be back when I have done them all (bodies), might take a while. Of course I will see to so the lines will be visible. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt: Now I finally have the drafts for the bodies, sorry it took so long.
We now (if those are fine with you) have to decide how you want the bodies:
1 Standing all four in one image, A
2 Standing all four in one image but half-half bodies so they would become two, like the images you linked to at the top
3 Lying female respectively male in each image, C and D
4 3 but as half-half and then we can have them without an offset
5 Or any other version you want
To really see their real sizes you would have to download them and look at them in a software that tells the level of zoom.
I think like this, most screens are in landscape and I try to keep the height of images to a maximum of 1 000 px. The 1 000 px is something I assume many screens can view (in a browser window) without having to scroll, to view the whole image. To be able to view as much details as possible I try to keep to this. It's always a problem as you don't know how an image will be consumed but the main target here is within an article at wikipedia but I always try to make them work as a free standing image which can be used in different places and circumstances, this is of course impossible but I try.
So give me feed back and we discuss how to set them up, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 19:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en: I think these look great, and my preference is A. You're making these as vector images, right, so we can arbitrarily adjust the scaling at any point? The more I think about it, the more I think that we should also have a gender-neutral version, just in case someone ever wants to use these images in a classroom or a news article. --Rob Hurt (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for not being clear, it's SVG I work in, the drafts are PNG due to rendering limitations where I show my drafts.
So they can be scaled to what ever one wants. But, this is in theory and technically. From a view point line thickness, spaces, relationship of stuff has to be edited when scaling much, both up and down. It's the same as text, a 20 pt (or px or what you use) sentence which is scaled to e.a. 180 pt has to be edited letter by letter (the distance between them) to look good.
A gender-neutral version is something we will have to discuss after female, male is completed. I have some reservations and points of opinion there.
@Goran tek-en: I think that file looks great, and thanks for crediting me too. I think it could also be worth posting separate versions of the male and female bodies in case someone wants to use only one of them for something specific. --Rob Hurt (talk) 18:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have made a change which I hope you approve. I made the female and male the same height, this so when they are used they will work well together e.g. Langer's lines. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt I hope you don't get tired of all my questions. I will here describe how I'm thinking around this and if there is something you don't agree with please let me know.
When I look at your linked images and others I searched for, it confuses me. The lines and the patterns they create are so different in the images. The way they follow the body and how. It also varies depending how close (detailed) they show them. So depending on how large, detailed the illustration is the more or less lines are used. It also seems to me that there is not a fix distance between the lines, within a specific illustration, they vary over the body.
To me, the way they are drawn more looks like tattoos than lines following the body.
So I'm thinking like this, imagine you use a string e.g. clothesline with a diameter and you glue that on the body where the lines exist. This also gives me the possibility to show that the lines actually follow the body around the edges to the back.
This is the way how I have drawn the drafts. Look at this draft which is in 400% and hopefully you will see what I mean. To me, this looks much better as an illustration but I'm not sure it's acceptable for you.
The drafts I will show you (not the final version) will look like those. As always they are PNG but the original file is SVG.
The difference to the final version is that I manually have edited the lines where they go around the body. It's not that visible directly but indirectly it gives you a better illustration, and that you can sense.
I actually would see that we could find a way so that the image size could be like the 200% drafts, but will see. Feedback before I continue, thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en Just to clarify, you want to decide whether the lines should be 3D and sit on top of the skin like string, or 2D and just mark the surface? I think that 2D would be better, because it makes it clearer that the lines are actually part of the skin itself (even though we can't see them with our eyes). They represent the direction of skin tension which is continuous, so you could draw infinitely many lines to represent it. I think for this purpose we should just make sure that the lines are reasonably accurate, and that we don't put so many that the image has more visual complexity than it needs to. Rob Hurt (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt Thanks for your explanation, I will do what you think is best for the purpose of those illustrations. In my "world" (I see most things as an image, which I want to be as beautiful as possible) I would prefer 3D but this request is yours and you know best what you need.
Those drafts are PNG versions of the original SVG file I'm working in and will upload to commons.
Those drafts are for proofreading only.
I need you to check if the lines ar OK like this in numbers, shapes etc. Please ignore them sticking out here and there, I will fix that ones you have approved them.
Looking at the different existing images confuse me a bit as they are so different in how the lines are drawn, so I had to guess a lot and go by my feeling. Feedback thanks. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en I think the density of lines is good, but I might change the color a bit to make them stand out against the skin a bit more. I realize that one of the illustrations (as opposed to the original anatomical images) oversimplified the lines, and they aren't quite right the way you have them. I think this image is the most correct, and I would use that as your guide. You can compare it to the others if you want: if the face is difficult to see in that image, this and this should help, and for the body this may help. You can also find other images, but they should generally agree with the first image. Rob Hurt (talk) 00:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should check the number of lines and how they are drawn. The color and how visible they are we can fine tune ones they are fine.
Thanks for telling me "which image is the most correct" as all the versions are so confusing, much appreciated.
The ears are difficult in this scale. If you also can accept the lying ones there we have some more room to fine tune if necessary.
The reason I choose to show the lines like this is because you wrote "that the lines are actually part of the skin itself", but as I said this can be changed later.
As the female breasts are drawn differently in the images I have looked at I have two versions for you to look at.
----
Those drafts are PNG versions of the original SVG file I'm working in and will upload to commons.
@Goran tek-en For the breast, I think these lines are the most correct, which is close to what you have in version 2. For the ears, I think we need to fix the base body's anatomy before fixing the lines--can you make it look more like the ear shown here? Rob Hurt (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt You didn't say anything about the other drafts and the lines so I assume that you have approved them.
@Goran tek-en These look good, though I don't think there should be a line on the nipple itself. For the ears, I think we're missing some of the structures (at least antihelix, cymba, cavum, and helix crus), as well as a definition of where the upper part of the tragus meets the helix crus. The rest of the body looks good though. Rob Hurt (talk) 18:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt I will add as good as I can but we don't have that kind of details for other parts of the body, especially when you consider how big an ear is and in this scale, drafts in 100%. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The lines can be in any color, thickness and opacity.
I prefer the "overlay" version as here the appearance of the lines are affected by what the body below looks like, in this way the lines becomes more of a part of the body. The grey lines are like rigid and apart of the body, to me. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en I think the thickness looks good, and are you saying that the opacity for the overlay is less than the other? Can you do the gray or a black or blue with slightly more transparency? Rob Hurt (talk) 18:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Those drafts are PNG versions of the original SVG file I'm working in and will upload to commons.
Those drafts are shown for proofreading only.
The ones I call "overlay" is a "Blend mode" between objects on top of each other, it doesn't specifically has to do with opacity. The top object changes its appearance depending on how light/bright the object below it is.
@Goran tek-en I think the lines look great. Now should we consider adding a gender-neutral version as well? For the color, I like the grey 100 the most out of the ones shown because it's very easy to see. The others may look a bit more natural, but for the purposes of a medical illustration like this, I think the most important thing is the information. What do you think? Rob Hurt (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
to be able to upload it at commons. For the different versions it's mostly the name which changes I guess.
2) Gender-neutral version
This is difficult for me. Please remember that English is not my native language.
To me we have female and male genders with all possible variations in between, it's not absolutely female or male, it's all variations in between.
To not show what we can (all variations) look like is to me to try to "oppress" or "disregard facts" and trying to influence other human beings.
How would a "gender-neutral version" look like, which parts is the problem? I think if you ask all the different cultures, religions, country systems, all other groups etc you would get very different answers. So I guess what would be left is an outline contour with flat fill color and how could one depict Langer's lines on that.
So at this time I will not create a "gender-neutral version" for this purpose. I really hope for your understanding so we can continue with your request here. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 12:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Names: "Langer's lines_male" and "Langer's lines_female" or just "Langer's lines" if you're going to post a version with both
Description: Langer's lines represent the direction of skin tension.
Caption: Artist's depiction of Langer's lines present in the skin of a human male. -or- Artist's depiction of Langer's lines present in the skin of a human female.
Categories: Langer's lines
Q1591425
I probably should have explained it a bit differently, because we might be talking about two different things. To me, gender-neutral would be the opposite of "all variations in between"--it would actually be the absence of any male/female/in-between information while preserving only the information that is common to both/all (to the best of our ability). This would be done not for the purpose of educating people about gender, but instead for the purpose of educating a wider audience of people about Langer's lines, because there are some contexts in which images like this would be less likely to be used for fear of censorship (I was thinking news articles and some classrooms, though of course not in medical contexts). In those cases, I wanted to give people an option to still use a version that they are comfortable with instead of none at all.
I wanted to explain my view here in case it helps, but if it doesn't resonate with you, then I certainly won't want you to make any illustrations that you disagree with. Rob Hurt (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For the "gender-neutral version" I'm struggling. If you search for "Androgynous human body illustration" there is not much difference to them and what we have, the genital parts are toned down in the ones we have here already. I do understand your point but to me the people censoring stuff like this is living in a world which I don't want to be a part of. And it will be so hard to decide how to look e.g. would male breasts be fine but not female breasts etc. Can we leave it for now and return later on.
@Goran tek-en Unlike Langer's lines, Blaschko's lines and dermatomes aren't real lines, but instead the regions of skin between the lines are derived from the same embryonic cell (Blaschko's) or are innervated by the same sensory neurons (dermatomes). This means that there is a correct density of lines for both, unlike for Langer's lines. I think this and this are the best images, but here is another. For dermatomes we definitely will want to shade the skin in between lines like here, and technically the same would be appropriate for Blaschko's lines, but we can decide if that will be too visually overwhelming or not. Rob Hurt (talk) 18:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en That's to demonstrate that the lines are slightly different for each person because of stochasticity during embryonic development--it's actually the same phenomenon that causes stripes on zebras, spots on cats, etc. which aren't identical from one individual to the next and aren't perfectly symmetrical within an individual. In general they should follow the same pattern on both sides, but there is some randomness. Rob Hurt (talk) 23:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt Before I continue I want to check this with you.
If you want areas here instead of lines we have to decide that now as it's two completely different ways of drawing and I also want to check if the lines I have here are correct.
@Goran tek-en Yes those lines look good. As for the areas, if we're going to do it, I think we should make all the areas colored/shaded, rather than some shaded and some not, like you have it. The question is how we want to do the coloring/shading. One option would be to have them all the same color, but different shades. Another option would be to have them different colors, like here. But graphic design isn't my specialty, so can you think of any other options we have? Rob Hurt (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt The colored version has another meaning to me, each color show something different than the other colors according to the legend. I think we should try shades ones they are all drawn. But a Blaschko pattern on a human being is a darker color and usual skin color around it. I will do the drawings now, might take a while. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 17:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob HurtHi Rob, I'm back (not 100% but enough) and I have picked up the drawing.
To do each field for blaschko so it can be filled separately is very complex to draw, and with four views it's really a lot.
So I hope we (mainly you) can think again if we need all fields to be able to fill them individually or maybe we can do something like this and we can also make separate version with just lines if you like. But having one version were just a few fields are filled will be much easier on me. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Goran tek-en I think these look good. The only minor question I have is whether it's possible to make the lines look like they attach to the skin better, following folds on the body such as the chest, armpits, and groin better. But if this is hard, it's not necessary. Other than that, we'll just have to play around with the line thickness and color to make them more visible, and decide whether we want the shading inside to be translucent or opaque. Rob Hurt (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt I can try to make them follow the actual body more, now I have followed the different images you showed me so I didn't know that they should be like that, but when I think about it, of course. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 18:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rob Hurt If those drafts not are good you will have to tell me more specifically what you want or even better show me an example.
@Goran tek-en I think the thing I'm noticing is that when the lines wrap around the sides of certain raised structures such as the trachea, breast, and knee, they should follow the contour of the structure rather than continuing straight undisturbed. But this is a minor stylistic point, so we don't need to spend too much time on it, especially if it's difficult. Can you also experiment with the line color/thickness/opacity to make them slightly more visible? Rob Hurt (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a photography of the physical object, and it is used as such in the only article linked to it. what exactly are you looking for? Wegates (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This strange flag of Albania comes from a mistake in an Italian textbook from the 1960s. Rename her, give a more appropriate name. Do not remove, is better to leave the information in the article that it is not real. the image comes from this link [8]213.192.68.53 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Crown in Crown Prince's standard [10] in the best quality I found. Princess' standard - in fact it is the same crown as in the first graphic, but in silver and without a star. Thank you for your help 213.192.68.53 15:15 17 December 2021 (UTC)
I agonized over these requests, but better handle it quickly. I would like to complete list of fascist movements about the symbols of these organizations:
I agonized over these requests, but better handle it quickly. I would like to complete list of fascist movements about the symbols of these organizations:
I agonized over these requests, but better handle it quickly. I would like to complete list of fascist movements about the symbols of these organizations:
I agonized over these requests, but better handle it quickly. I would like to complete list of fascist movements about the symbols of these organizations:
The coats of arms and flags proposed by Wilhelm Solf for the German colonies in 1914.
These coats of arms and flags have been on the internet for a very long time and nobody to my knowledge has taken a crack at vectorizing them, would be mighty nice and helpful for any projects if someone tidied them up. -- NorthTension (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)) 22:21, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan SVG Not done - missing arabic text
I asked on reddit what the subtitles should look like correctly, but nobody wanted to help. All I know is that the name of the Mohammed in Udru is written in the center of the star, at the top of this graphic is the most similar notation. on the shoulders of the star are the names of the first five caliphs (Abu Bakr ابوبکر صدیق) (Umar عمر بن خطاب) (Uthman عثمان بن عفان) (Ali علی ابن ابی طالب) (Mu'awiya I (علی ابن ابی طالب) The crescent is inscribed with a few words of hadith regarding virtues of companions. The script used is Nastaliq.
Thank you, also for adapting the existing translations for de and fr. I added the graphic to the four other Wikipedias that have an article on PFASs (es, fi, nl, pl). --Leyo22:35, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Coat of arms of Poland
Coat of arms of Poland - official version
Article(s): Articles related to Poland
Request
Is it possible to fix up this coat of arms a little, (here (p. 9) is how it should look. Now there are some flaws:
There's wrong type of crown.
Bottom of the shield isn't pointy and while it looks like that in a source provided, I think it was just accidently cropped.
Some weird stains on the beak, crown and talons
It would be good to revectorize the edges of eagle and shield itself, they kinda look bad when zoomed in
However do not change colours. Even if they are different on the official document, on the very next page (10) there are specifications on the exact shades of colors white and red, which after conversion to SRGB are #E9E8E7 and #D4213D. (You can change them if in the svg file there are different colors, but for me it seems just like the SRGB colors I gave). For this same reason I would leave yellow same. Even though it's lighter in the document, you can see that white and red are also lighter than the specification)--Piotr Bart (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please fix the two invalid SVGs. I tried adding xlmns because I've seen another editor do that before and it has helped. It didn't help with the RSVG rendering of these SVGs though, only the browser rendering. --Jonteemil (talk) 15:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
I added the namespace to the first, and it now renders. Why are you trying to vectorizze a photograph? It makes a huge SVG file that is a poor copy of the original. The 10 MB image may be too complicated to render in the allotted time. Glrx (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Glrx: Thanks for fixing the first one, do you think you can fix the second one as well? These are not my files so any questions regarding why anyone would need them you should ask the uploader.Jonteemil (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonteemil and Mrmw: Sorry, but I did not have time to fix the second this morning (I was running out the door, and MW was taking for ever to render the image). Mrmw came to our rescue and fixed the second file by adding the namespaces. You had the correct diagnosis. Glrx (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Article(s): Numerous articles across Wikipedia, where these three files appear.
Request
The three maps above need to be updated, because the Konya-Karaman high speed rail line was opened on 8 January 2022.
The latter two maps are duplicates of the the first and original map, and all three maps are widely used in Wikipedia articles. None of the original uploaders of these maps are active in Wikimedia Commons.
Here is a source and other maps from Wikimedia Commons for reference:
City has adopted a new flag. [12] Please add a new flag and vectorize old (the given file is different from the right flag, the correct image is also in the link). The new flag is probably registered as a trademark, so add restrictions. 213.192.68.53 21:12 January 16 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, the first is great, but in the second, two more details need to be corrected. the seal should be outlined in silver and the map does not contain lakes and islands, except greenland.
[13] Please remove the little black text from the bottom of the flag. This additional inscription appears on digital reproductions but not on photos of the real flag. 213.192.68.53 15:51 January 29 2022 (UTC)
An user sent a request at my talk page for a Vietnam People's Navy insignia, he described that is "basically a golden anchor with the rice things and the red Vietnamese roundel", which also used as roundel for naval aviation, and he hopes this could be presented via a SVG image at Commons and under a free license.
An user sent a message at my talk page for the flag of the Vietnam Self-Defence Militia, he described the flag "shares the gold-red color schemes of the Flag of Vietnam, the square similar to the File:Insignia of the Vietnam Self-Defence Militia.svg with the surrounding rice symbol, the shining star image and the "DQTV" label".
3D ball-and-stick and spacefilling model of the crystal structure of phosphonium iodide (PH 4I) as described in the listed references, to replace the current crude cation+anion combination. It is a distorted version of the NH 4Cl structure, with tetragonal symmetry.[1][2] --–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
↑ (September 1967). "Hydrogen Bonding in Phosphonium Iodide: A Neutron-Diffraction Study". The Journal of Chemical Physics47 (5): 1818–1822. DOI:10.1063/1.1712171.
Original image in here. The image depicts the mascot of the website, which is published as CC-BY-SA. Image is imitated ILoveLanguages! style, her costume is cosplay of Inai Inai Baa!. --Thyj (talk) 03:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pre-2021 version: Gold part of badge needs slight scaling and centering so the arms properly touch the silver border. Note the very slight lack of symmetry.
Post-2021 version: Compare with this design uploaded directly from the U.S. Dept. of Defense website. The post-2021 SVG image is an altered version of the pre-2021 version, but the alterations only amount to adding the third sword haphazardly, which isn't completely accurate. The gold crest inside the silver border needs to ever-so-slightly be rescaled and centred, and the middle sword to cover the area where the top silver circle is now. The area just above that needs to be reshaped to match the new version. The result should be symmetrical and (aside from keeping with the SVG art style) match the real JCS badge.--SuperWIKI (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
County has adopted a new flag. [21] Please replace the yellow flag with a new design and upload the old flag as another file with the name [Flag of Arlington County (1983-2022)] 213.192.68.53 17:36 24 January 2022 (UTC)
City has adopted a new flag. sourcedesign Please replace the given file with a new design and upload the old flag as another file with the name: [Flag of Lincoln, Nebraska (1931-2022)] 213.192.68.53 09:36 25 January 2022 (UTC)
lincoln flag contest rules (8. All submitted entries shall become the property of the City of Lincoln, and may be modified, reproduced,
and published at the City of Lincoln’s sole discretion. By submitting an entry to the City Flag Design
Contest you are granting the City of Lincoln an exclusive, perpetual, sublicensable, assignable, royalty-free
license to reproduce the content contained in the entry.)
I don't know about the law in Nebraska, but the project should probably have the same status as the seal. It doesn't matter anymore, someone else arranged it.
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
I changed its width and height to 100% (nominally 512px thumbnail) to reveal detail (there's not much!) The file was likely obtained by cropping a blank world map. As Monaco's area is small, it's better to use a large-scale map as a source. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ09:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The creator and owner of the file, User:Kes47 is upset with the change and doesn't want to update the new turquoise blue flag also he started to edit Wikipedia pages referring to Honduras flag removing turquoise and stating that is not a neutral point of view to change the flag despite the new president Xiomara Castro just officialy returned to the turquoise blue mentioned in Legislative Decree no.29 of 1949. COAmaker17 (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How funny to read COAmaker17's mendacious irrelevant comment right when I was making preparations for the upcoming file update. My edits at Wikipedia to aim for neutrality (and common sense) are irrelevant, and nobody asked me how "I felt" about the update request. But since that user mentioned me: yes, I agree with this request (not that it matters, right?). And yes MapGrid, you guys missed the tird step. -Kes47[REPORT AN ERROR]22:23, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
More curious for me is that only when someone mentions you about this issue you start to act on it when recently you were reverting editions of the Honduran Flag page trying to impose your point of view, and yes, your recent editions in Wikipedia are relevant in this case leaving aside that you already knew about the request to update the flag for twelve days and you had not done anything until now. COAmaker17 (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A certain user uploaded a new image without properly explaining why. He or she uploaded the same image 5 times without ever engaging in a discussion on the file's talk page; this is why the file had to be put into a protected state.
The same user repeatedly corrupted many of the links on the page such that they did not match their captions.
The same user repeatedly removed the flag from the SVG Flags of Honduras category and placed it into a non-existent category.
Also, there was initially an expectation (from me) that the flag at presidencia.gob.hn would be promptly updated by the government as proof of the change. Ultimately it appears the old government simply removed the domain name from DNS and made the entire website go away. Not cool. Clearly my expectations were too high.
So yes, it is not surprising that the page went though lots of rollbacks by lots of people. Please don't assume that those involved in the rollbacks are against a colour change. MapGrid (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@COAmaker17: I'm gonna answer one more time cause you keep lying. Your ability to assume things is astounding. I didn't notice that request till yesterday, and so I estarted uploading that other file; then you mentioned me here. I only noticed one file being replaced by other in es:Wikipedia, a permited it. Other thing: as far as I know, I don´t have to participate in your request, as you are implying. If you build up a good case for the update to be made in a file like this, it will be made with or without my approval. -Kes47[REPORT AN ERROR]18:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kes47 Your whole statement falls apart, first it wasn't before I mentioned you here that you started "to prepare the file" but after, this can be proved just looking at the time of your preparations and comparing this time to the time that I mentioned you here, so in fact when I mentioned you at 21:41 you started to do your "preparations" at 21:53. Also you continue to impose your point of view that the new flag is not turquoise and continue removing the word turquoise and just leaving blue in the Wikimedia page Flag of Honduras.svg and the Wikipedia page of Bandera de Honduras. COAmaker17 (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hahahaha. So, in your mind, I saw your mention, said to myself "I gotta so something right now!", ran as fast as I could and just a minute later you mentioned me I uploaded this file (with all the information it requieres). No body, I was already on my editing/uploading when you mentioned me, and why I found your comment funny. That's just the time I published those changes. Anyway... Change is done, right? Other issues you have you can discuss them elsewhere - Kes47[REPORT AN ERROR]19:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to request the creation of an extracted (SVG) version of the above seal. The Traditional Chinese characters in the seal are "河內公使" (Hà-Nội Công-sứ, written up-to-down, right-to-left). Above it is the text "HA-NOÏ". The French text is "Le Resident de France" written on the outer rim of the seal. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please add vectorized versions of flag of Pipil people the file is not perfect, in the middle there should be the symbol I gave.
Lenca flag looks like this, but it comes in many variants. The wreath is from the UN emblem. The symbol above the pyramid is indistinct and is absent in one version. [23][24][25]213.192.68.53 12:08 January 31 2022 (UTC)
Graphist opinion(s)
Font specimen for new Microsoft fonts Tenorite, Bierstadt, Skeena, Seaford and Grandview
Calibri (PNG)
Corbel (SVG)
Article(s): yet to come, not existing yet in w:en or w:de
Request
(I still don’t feel home at Commons and this is my 1st request in this workshop.)
In April 2021 w:Microsoft published a set of 5 new fonts and announced to replace Microsoft Office’s default font w:Calibri with one of those. The fonts are already available in Microsoft 365 (Office in the cloud).[1]
I’d like to have a set of specimen, maybe like the ones above.
I am not sure whether PNG or SVG would be better. SVG is usually better but part of the C* fonts’ and the upcoming fonts’ value is their enhanced use of w:ClearType. This rendering technique can only be captured as PNG but only in 1:1 display size and in its original orientation.
--Frupa (talk) 13:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, similar to my last few requests, will someone please create SVG files of the flags of the following towns and cities in the Loire-Atlantique department, all of which would include elements from their coat of arms' provided above:
I created it from scratch but then I was forced to manipulate it with Inkscape because the lettering didn't work properly in Wiki Commons. Could you please help me to get a plain, elegant SVG file?--Carnby (talk) 22:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The colored SVG image glitches at 2048×2048px, hiding the elements in the upper right angle. Please, fix this.
In addition, since many elements in the colored SVG image don't match the original PNG drawings, you could improve the overall design using the uncolored SVG as a base, but please note that the uncolored SVG image is not perfectly squared, while all the other images are. --Est. 2021 (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion(s)
files to be corrected
remove the blank Done
remove the blank Done
there should also be a white frame around the blue one, the same width as the blue one Done
drawings should be white, not blank Done
Symbol inside the star is usually not displayed Done
Article(s):
Request
These five flags contain minor errors and I am asking you to fix them. 213.192.68.53 08:20 4 February 2022 (UTC)
There is no image of sufficient quality to corroborate such details [26][27], the problem is that the symbol disappears when displayed in an article 213.192.68.53 12:17 7 February 2022 (UTC)
initially i thougt i have to remove the logo, the logo is raster, should be svg, could you tell me wich hebrew-chrakter it is? see temp-upload --Mrmw (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I cannot say exactly what it should look like, choose the one most similar to what was. 213.192.68.53 13:24 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Great thank you for granting my request. So far, this file is displayed differently to me depending on where I am viewing it that's why I will wait with marking the section as solved. 213.192.68.53 18:28 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. - 213.192.68.53 (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Done First, I cropped and overwrote (I hope correctly) the image on Commons, and second, I got full resolution from linked original - if you need it, I will upload it under some other name. - Gabuxae (talk) 12:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A) Which filename you think will be good? B) What is "inner" - only small part with photo and title, or big piece of paper with "St.59" on it? - Gabuxae (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Someone suggested at en:Talk:Tesseract#Change arrow to point up that the green arrow in the third panel (dimension "2") should be pointing upward, since the "Y" axis points upward in the coordinate system diagram in the last panel (and that would make all the arrows point in a positive direction). I agree. The change should be pretty trivial to make, but I can't do it myself. - dcljr (talk) 06:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if this is the right place for STL files, but the Wikimedia rendering of this STL file I created has very bad Z-fighting. It appears fine on a third-party site:
This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 15:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Illustration workshop
Proposal 1
Proposal 2
Proposal 6
Proposal 7
Proposal 8
Proposal 10
Proposal 11 (version 1)
Proposal 11 (version 2)
Proposal 11 (version 3)
Proposal 13
Proposal 14
Proposal 15
Proposal 16
Request taken by En rouge (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Norway flag 1821 proposal 1.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 2.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 6.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 7.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 8.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 10.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 11-A.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 11-B.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 11-C.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 13.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 14.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 15.svg
Norway flag 1821 proposal 16.svg
right lion to most flags, but on some he shouldn't have a crown and the golden ax
Lion for 7, the ax should be larger and the tail is different
crown for 8 and 16, jewels must be gilded
the lion most similar to the 15, also the wrong tail.svg)
_2.svg)
correct flag
correct coat of arms
Done
Emblem of Vindhya Pradesh
Emblem of Bombay State![Vectorized emblem of Bombay State[OK]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4d/Emblem_of_Bombay_State.svg/120px-Emblem_of_Bombay_State.svg.png)
Vectorized emblem of Bombay State
Emblem of Goa, Daman and Diu
Emblem of India
![Vectorized emblem of Bombay State[OK]](/https/commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emblem_of_Bombay_State.svg)
Langer's lines
Dermatomes
Original seal
SVG01
SVG02
SVG03.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Flag of Identity Evropa.svg SVG
Flag of French Nationalist Party.svg SVG
Flag of American Front.svg SVG
Flag of Anti-Communist Action 1.svg SVG
Flag of Anti-Communist Action 2.svg SVG
Flag of ELAM.svg SVG
Flag of Eidgenössische Sammlung.svg SVG
Request taken by Mrmw (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Flag of Svoboda.svg SVG
Flag of The III. Path.svg SVG
Union of Bulgarian National Legions
Italian Social Movement
New Flag
People's Party Our Slovakia
National Vanguard (exactly in this form)
New Force (Italy)
Nacionalni stroj
National Democratic Party of Germany (alternate)
National Christian Party
Free German Workers' Party (alternate)
National Front (UK)
.jpg)
.png)
.svg)
Flag of Italian Social Movement.svg SVG
Flag of National Vanguard.svg SVG
Flag of New Force.svg SVG
Flag of Nacionalni stroj.svg SVG
Flag of National Christian Party.svg SVG
Flag of National Front.svg SVG
Ukrainian National Union (political party)
Hutaree
National Youth (the same colors as on the Swedish flag)
The Base (hate group)
National Union of Greece
New Triumph Party
Freethinkers' Party
Freethinkers' Party logo
Tacuara Nationalist Movement
.jpg)
Flag of Ukrainian National Union.svg SVG
Flag of Hutaree.svg SVG
Flag of National Youth.svg SVG
Flag of The Base.svg SVG
Flag of National Union of Greece.svg SVG
Flag of New Triumph Party.svg SVG
Flag of Freethinkers' Party.svg SVG
Logo of Freethinkers' Party.svg SVG
Proposed Coat of Arms of German Cameroon
Proposed Flag of German East Africa
Proposed Coat of Arms of German Togo
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan
Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan SVG
Not done - missing arabic text
PDRE emblem
Coat of arms of Poland - official version
.svg)
Uncropped SVG image
Logo
File:Rail transport map of Turkey.png
File:Rail transport map of Turkey-m.png
File:Rail transport map of Turkey in Turkish.png
File:TCDD.svg
File:Tcdd network.png
SVG
Flag of Tulsa (1924–1941)
Flag of Tulsa (1941–1973)
SVG
SVG.jpg)
.jpg)
_blank.svg){kind=spacer}
.svg)
.svg)
Base of graphics
Image should be named as this
.svg)
the colors should be identical_1929.svg)
create a second version by changing the colors of the diamond and the red stripe with each other.svg)
img 1 (Correct)
img 2
JCS Badge (pre-2021)
JCS Badge (post-2021)
.svg)
Flag of Arlington County (1983-2022)
Flag of Lincoln, Nebraska (1931-2022).svg)
Supposedly a map of Monaco.svg)
Hà Ninh Tổng đốc (河寧總督)._seal.png)
The Seal of the French resident of Hanoi on a document..png)
Pipil people
Calibri (PNG)
Corbel (SVG)
Arms of Donges
Arms of Nort-sur-Erdre
Arms of Rezé.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Logo for pharmaceutical drugs that can be sold without medical prescription.svg)
Colored SVG
Colored PNG
Uncolored SVG
.svg)
remove the blank
remove the blank
there should also be a white frame around the blue one, the same width as the blue one
drawings should be white, not blank
Symbol inside the star is usually not displayed
Thank you. Could you please upload the original painting in full resolution and crop it to the inner part? Ratte (talk) 17:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Dimension levels.svg
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Hunza.svg){kind=link}
![[10]](https://img4.bdbphotos.com/images/230x300/t/v/tvtq870l48hvl740.jpg?skj2io4l){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
![[13]](https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/70c9cd4/2147483647/strip/true/crop/960x640+0+0/resize/880x587!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fround-lake.dustinice.workers.dev%3A443%2Fhttp%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fsites%2Fidaho%2Ffiles%2F201709%2FProudToBePocatello.jpg){kind=link}
![[15]](https://cdn.tuoitre.vn/2022/1/20/logo-2-1642676004424544050383.jpg){kind=link}
![[18]](https://preview.redd.it/36tvm9tta7d81.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=15a6bfdcbf0e644b659bd67f2d31d3f915a5f904){kind=link}
![[19]](https://i.redd.it/lcqm50tta7d81.png){kind=link}
![[20]](https://preview.redd.it/laeslgtta7d81.jpg?width=960&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=37e272bb083c792ac958b08d8ed3ba9e0c65d83f){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![[24]](https://lencasorg.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/p9120328.jpg){kind=link}
![[26]](https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us~apl.jpg){kind=link}
![[27]](https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/u/us~hfapsl.jpg){kind=link}
