Details
- Reviewers
• gabriel - Commits
- rMOZILLACENTRALb7fd45513dbf: Bug 1950511 - part 1: prepare the repackaging files related to rpm r=gabriel
- Bugzilla Bug ID
- 1950511
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rMOZILLACENTRAL mozilla-central
Event Timeline
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/manpages.in | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ↗ | (On Diff #976159) | This looks odd. Is this file actually used? |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/package-prefs.js | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 | @gerard-majax isn't it the default value now on Linux? | |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/package-prefs.js | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 | ||
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/package-prefs.js | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 | yes only nightly for now | |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/manpages.in | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ↗ | (On Diff #976159) | This file come from the browser/installer/linux/app/deb directory and its only mandatory with the debian building process. We can remove this file, the mv_manpage_files function from the patch part-2 needs to be modify to not copy this file if missing. |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/manpages.in | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ↗ | (On Diff #976159) | Instead of modifying mv_manpage_files let's not call it here: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D235976#8216799 If it is specific to .deb let's leave it out of the common module. |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/firefox.spec.in | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Should this be a variable, so nightly/beta/etc get different summaries? | |
| python/sites/repackage-rpm.txt | ||
| 1–2 ↗ | (On Diff #981926) | This belongs with part 3. That said I'm not sure we have a separate site for this, it could presumably reuse repackage-deb or repackage-desktop-file which are identical? |
| browser/installer/linux/app/rpm/firefox.spec.in | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | You right! There is the variable DESCRIPTION available for this summary. I’ve must have forget to update this file. | |
| python/sites/repackage-rpm.txt | ||
| 1–2 ↗ | (On Diff #981926) | For what I’ve understand, this file is automatically detected during the process by using the value of the virtual environment related to the command. So can it mean that, to reuse one of these other files, the virtual env must be shared? And you right, this file belong to the part 3, I will move it in this patch. |
Please update the commit message to use this bug #: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950505
This revision requires a Testing Policy Project Tag to be set before landing. Please apply one of testing-approved, testing-exception-unchanged, testing-exception-ui, testing-exception-elsewhere, testing-exception-other. Tip: this Firefox add-on makes it easy!