![]() |
| Rachmaninoff confers with Eugene Ormandy |
The composer's own performances can be uniquely authoritative when the composer is also a superb performer. This is just what we have with Sergei Rachmaninoff's recordings of his four piano concertos and the Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini.
His electrical recordings of these works took place periodically from 1929 to 1941. The composer, born in 1873, died two years after the final session.
All the recordings were with the Philadelphia Orchestra, the earlier ones led by Leopold Stokowski, the later sessions by Eugene Ormandy.
I'll present these concerted works in two posts: today, the Concertos No. 1 and 2, and the Rhapsody; the subsequent post will cover the third and fourth concertos.
Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, Concerto No. 1
Rachmaninoff's disembodied head appears to be emerging from a dust storm over the steppes in the cover of this LP reissue. The album combines:- The Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini, written in 1934 and recorded shortly after the work's premiere by the composer with Stokowski conducting.
- The first concerto, written in 1891 and revised in 1917, here conducted by Ormandy in 1939-40 sessions.
The Rhapsody vies with the second concerto as Rachmaninoff's most popular work. The first concerto is the weakest of the group - but it's a student composition.
The Rhapsody theme by Paganini is from the last of his 24 Caprices for solo violin. It is related to the Dies Irae, which Rachmaninoff duly quotes. The famous slow Variation XVIII is an inversion of the Paganini theme.
![]() |
| Rachmaninoff, circa 1933 |
Irving Kolodin greeted this reissue in the Saturday Review as follows: "Priceless documentation of the way a standard work of the literature sounded when new, and as played by the composer. The sound is tubby and without much resonance, but the artistic experience is there." To my ears, the sound is fairly good, after some encouragement.
Ray Ericson wrote in High Fidelity: "One of his best works, the rhapsody has been well described as 'musical champagne,' and its effervescence should last for some time. The playing is actually not as brilliant or note perfect as in many of today's concert performances of the work, and the composer could treat rather cavalierly his own dynamic markings in the printed score. Still, this is a definitive performance, in that Rachmaninoff wrote piano music to suit his style and technical specialties. Delicacy and complete lack of sentimentality mark the total performance, with its finely tapered phrases, glittering filigree, bell-like tones, and exact rhythms."
Neither reviewer was overwhelmed by the early concerto. Kolodin: "Much of it anticipates ideas more powerfully expressed in other works, but it has its melodic moments. This recording is more satisfactory." Ericson: "Somewhat dull in musical content, it is a characteristic work, characteristically played, and as such should appeal to Rachmaninoff's idolaters."
LINK to Rhapsody and Concerto No. 1
Concerto No. 2
If the Rhapsody's eighteenth variation is the composer's most popular melody, the Second Concerto is his most popular complete work. Unlike Rachmaninoff's earlier compositions, it was a success from the time of its 1901 premiere: the concerto made him famous.
This 1929 recording is perhaps the definitive performance, despite disagreements between composer and conductor. Amazingly, Stokowski insisted on disputing points of interpretation with Rachmaninoff, and the sessions were fraught with tension. None of this is apparent in the final product (nor is any residual resentment noticeable in the 1934 recording discussed above).
![]() |
| Leopold Stokowski |
Kolodin: "I would describe as unique the leonine, infinitely expressive performance by Rachmaninoff of his Second Concerto, with a Stokowski conducted accompaniment of incomparable richness."
Philip Hart in High Fidelity: "Rachmaninoff's interpretation - and Stokowski's too - is wonderfully authoritative: The resolute solidity of cadential chords, the tenutos on the first notes of those quasi-cadenzas in the third movement, the triumphant expansiveness of the brass fanfare announcing the first-movement development, the fast albeit perfectly maintained tempos. the elegant rubato and tapered phrasing - these and many more such felicities add substance and form to by far the best of the Rachmaninoff concertos. It's too bad the composer didn't record this just one more time, with reasonably modern engineering."
Actually, as realized here, the recording is impressive for nearly 100 years ago. The piano tone was problematic, but some adjustments have improved it. To me, the sound does both composer/pianist and conductor more than credit.
LINK to Concerto No. 2




















.jpg)








.jpg)














