Bridging Standardized Codebook and Site-Specific Beamforming: A Unified Limited-Feedback Framework

We adopt a sparse geometric channel model, which represents the channel as a superposition of $L$ dominant propagation paths [Ayach2014SpatiallySparse]. Let $\mathbf{h}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times 1}$ denote the instantaneous DL channel vector. It is represented as

where $\alpha_{l}\in\mathbb{C}$ denotes the complex gain of the $l$-th path, including large-scale attenuation and small-scale fading, and $\mathbf{a}(\varphi_{l})$ is the transmit-array steering vector associated with the angle of departure $\varphi_{l}$. We collect the steering vectors and path gains as $\mathbf{A}=[\mathbf{a}(\varphi_{1}),\ldots,\mathbf{a}(\varphi_{L})]\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times L}$ and $\bm{\alpha}=[\alpha_{1},\ldots,\alpha_{L}]^{T}\in\mathbb{C}^{L\times 1}$.

Before CSI feedback, the UE first performs initial access through SSB beam sweeping. Specifically, the BS transmits a predefined SSB probing codebook $\mathbf{B}=[\mathbf{b}_{1},\ldots,\mathbf{b}_{K}]\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times K}$ [3GPP38211, 3GPP38215]. For the $i$-th probing beam, the received SSB signal is modeled as

where $P_{\text{SSB}}$ is the SSB transmit power, $\mathbf{s}_{\rm SSB}\in\mathbb{C}^{L_{s}\times 1}$ collects the SSB symbols used for this measurement, and $\mathbf{n}_{{\rm SSB},i}\sim\mathcal{CN}(\mathbf{0}_{L_{s}},\sigma_{n}^{2}\mathbf{I}_{L_{s}})$ is the corresponding noise vector ¹¹1In NR, SSB measurements are obtained over specific time-frequency resource elements. For analytical compactness, we aggregate these resource elements into a vector and do not separately track their time-frequency indices.. The UE measures the RSRP of the $i$-th beam by averaging the received SSB power over the aggregated SSB symbols,

Following [sim], the dB-domain RSRP can be modeled as a noisy observation of an ideal beam power,

where $r_{\mathbf{b}_{i}}^{0}$ is the noise-free dB-domain RSRP value and $n_{\mathbf{b}_{i}}$ is a Gaussian perturbation with mean $\mu_{b}$ and variance $\sigma_{b}^{2}$. The detailed expressions of $r_{\mathbf{b}_{i}}^{0}$, $\mu_{b}$, and $\sigma_{b}^{2}$ can be found in Eq. (7), Eq. (8a), and Eq. (8b) of [sim]. After sweeping all $K$ SSB beams, the UE obtains the RSRP fingerprint

where $\mathbf{r}_{\mathbf{B}}^{0}=[r_{\mathbf{b}_{1}}^{0},\ldots,r_{\mathbf{b}_{K}}^{0}]^{T}$ and $\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{B}}=[n_{\mathbf{b}_{1}},\ldots,n_{\mathbf{b}_{K}}]^{T}$. During initial access, the UE measures $\mathbf{r}_{\mathbf{B}}$ to determine the access beam and the associated random-access resources before subsequent CSI acquisition.
The above initial-access stage only provides coarse beam-level information for synchronization and access establishment, but it is generally insufficient for high-quality downlink beamforming. To support data transmission, the BS still needs a more refined UE-specific CSI representation, since the resulting beamforming performance critically depends on the quality of CSI acquisition. In practical limited-feedback systems, this requires additional CSI-reference signal (CSI-RS) transmission, UE-side channel estimation, CSI compression, and feedback. When the transmit-antenna dimension is large, such CSI acquisition can incur substantial training, feedback, and processing overhead. Therefore, the key issue is how efficiently this representation can be acquired under limited online resources.

Recall the DL data transmission model in (4). If the DL CSI $\mathbf{h}$ is available at the BS, the single-user single-stream beamforming problem can be characterized as

with the optimal solution to be the matched-filter or maximum-ratio-transmission (MRT) beamformer $\mathbf{w}^{\star}=\mathbf{h}/\|\mathbf{h}\|$. In practice, however, the BS does not directly know the UE-specific DL channel. In TDD systems, uplink sounding and channel reciprocity may provide a useful estimate [Larsson2014MassiveMIMO], but calibration and refinement can still be required when reciprocity is imperfect or when the full-dimensional channel is not directly observable. In FDD systems, the DL CSI must instead be estimated at the UE and fed back to the BS.
We abstract this DL acquisition process as three coupled stages: 1) BS-side CSI-RS transmission, 2) UE-side CSI extraction and compression, and 3) BS-side reconstruction. Let $\mathbf{S}_{\text{CSI}}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{c}\times L_{c}}$ denote the CSI-RS training matrix transmitted over $L_{c}$ channel uses from $N_{c}$ CSI-RS ports, which represent effective pilot transmission dimension seen by the UE, rather than necessarily a physical transmit antenna, and let $\mathbf{C}\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times N_{c}}$ denote the CSI-RS precoder ²²2As for SSB, CSI-RS symbols over time-frequency resource elements are aggregated into a training matrix for analytical compactness.. The received CSI-RS is given by

where $P_{\text{CSI}}$ is the CSI-RS transmit power and $\mathbf{n}_{\text{CSI}}\sim\mathcal{CN}(\mathbf{0}_{L_{c}},\sigma_{n}^{2}\mathbf{I}_{L_{c}})$. Based on $\mathbf{y}_{\text{CSI}}(\mathbf{C})$, the UE obtains a CSI representation through an acquisition mapping $\mathcal{R}$, e.g., least-squares (LS) or minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimation [Hassibi2003Training]. In general, $L_{c}$ should be no less than $N_{c}$ to reliably recover $\mathbf{h}$. Hence, the overhead for DL channel estimation is at least $\mathcal{O}(N_{c}^{2})$. To avoid distraction from estimation error, we assume perfect acquisition under the required training dimension and write $\mathbf{h}=\mathcal{R}(\mathbf{y}_{\text{CSI}})$ with $\mathcal{R}:\mathbb{C}^{L_{c}\times 1}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times 1}$.
Since feeding back full CSI is generally prohibitive, the UE compresses the acquired CSI into a lower-dimensional feedback message

where $\mathcal{Q}:\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times 1}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^{N_{q}\times 1}$ represents the UE-side compression rule. The dimension $N_{q}$ should be understood as a normalized feedback-payload proxy, e.g., the number of scalar coefficients or indices conveyed to the BS. Here, $N_{q}$ is only adopted as an abstract channel-use-equivalent feedback overhead. The detailed modeling of the uplink feedback channel is beyond the scope of this paper. After receiving $\mathbf{z}$, the BS reconstructs the channel as

where $\mathcal{F}:\mathbb{C}^{N_{q}\times 1}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times 1}$ is the BS-side reconstruction mapping. In general, $\mathcal{F}$ is not the inverse of $\mathcal{Q}$, because the UE-side compression is lossy. As a consequence, the optimal MRT beamformer based on this reconstructed channel is given by

Lemma 1 and Theorem 1 show that the performance of a limited-feedback scheme is governed by how efficiently its induced representation subspace captures channel energy. The path-capture factor $g_{l}$ measures the fraction of the $l$-th path energy preserved by the scheme, and the overall CSI-capture efficiency is a path-power-weighted average of these factors. Therefore, problem (14) can be approximately rewritten as

Problem (14) and (20) are both difficult to solve directly because the CSI acquisition, compression, and reconstruction mappings are coupled. Nevertheless, the subspace-projection viewpoint reveals a useful design principle: a limited-feedback scheme should preserve as much dominant channel energy as possible while minimizing CSI-RS and feedback overhead. The following sections use this viewpoint to reinterpret standardized mechanisms and to motivate the proposed SSI-enhanced design.

The Type-I feedback serves as the simplest and lightest-weight limited-feedback beamforming mechanism in current NR systems, offering low implementation complexity and feedback overhead at the cost of relatively low spectral efficiency.

To overcome the coarse spatial quantization of Type-I feedback, Type-II scheme provides a more flexible and higher-resolution beam-domain representation of the channel.

To reduce the high feedback overhead and UE-side computational complexity of the flexible Type-II feedback while retaining a richer channel representation than the single-beam Type-I feedback, the PSC was introduced as a more structured limited-feedback mechanism. Instead of representing the channel through a large beam-domain dictionary, PSC restricts the feedback to a selected subset of effective ports and the associated low-dimensional coefficients.

Compared with conventional Type-II feedback, the key idea of the proposed feedback scheme is to infer the dominant transmit subspace at the BS before explicit UE-side CSI estimation and feedback. To make this possible, the BS must rely on a lightweight channel-dependent observation that is available before the CSI-RS stage. The RSRP vector $\mathbf{r}_{\mathbf{B}}$ acquired during SSB probing serves this purpose.
Specifically, the RSRP vector captures how the channel energy is distributed over a set of coarse probing directions. Although this RSRP vector is insufficient to recover the full instantaneous CSI because phase information is unavailable, it provides a beam-domain power fingerprint that is strongly related to the dominant angular support of the channel [Heng2022SiteSpecificProbing, Ning2023RSRPCodebook, sim]. In site-specific environments with relatively stable propagation geometry and a limited number of dominant scattering clusters, similar dominant propagation directions tend to induce similar RSRP patterns. Accordingly, the RSRP vector provides a suitable low-overhead input for BS-side prediction of a candidate dominant beam subspace.
To this end, we suppose that the BS infers a UE-dependent low-dimensional channel subspace through a mapping

where $Q\ll N_{t}$ and the columns of $\mathbf{C}_{p}$ are expected to align with the dominant propagation directions of the current UE. Without loss of generality, we assume that $\mathbf{C}_{p}$ is an orthonormal basis of the inferred subspace, since any linearly independent basis can be transformed into an equivalent orthonormal basis via QR decomposition without changing its span.
In this way, the dominant transmit directions are no longer searched exhaustively at the UE as in conventional Type-II, but are instead inferred at the BS by conditioning the offline learned SSI on the RSRP fingerprint. The remaining online feedback task is therefore reduced to refining the instantaneous low-dimensional coefficients over the inferred subspace.

After the BS determines $\mathbf{C}_{p}$, it transmits beamformed CSI-RS only over this inferred subspace. The received CSI-RS at the UE is then

where $\mathbf{S}_{\text{CSI}}\in\mathbb{C}^{Q\times L_{c}}$. Compared with the conventional limited-feedback schemes, the CSI-RS dimension is reduced from $N_{t}$ to $Q$, which significantly reduces the CSI acquisition overhead from $\mathcal{O}(N_{t}^{2})$ to $\mathcal{O}(Q^{2})$. In this case, the UE observes the effective channel over the inferred subspace

We still assume that the UE can perfectly recover $\mathbf{h}_{p}$ from the received CSI-RS, i.e., $\mathbf{h}_{p}=\mathcal{R}_{p}\big(\mathbf{y}_{\text{CSI}}(\mathbf{C}_{p})\big)$.
Therefore, unlike conventional Type-II feedback, the UE no longer needs to either determine the dominant beam directions or estimate the coefficients by solving an optimization problem from the full-dimensional channel estimate. Instead, it can directly report the estimated $\mathbf{h}_{p}$, which already provides a low-dimensional representation of the DL CSI, to the BS. In this sense, the UE-side CSI compression mapping $\mathcal{Q}_{p}$ reduces to an identity mapping over the inferred low-dimensional channel domain:

Accordingly, after receiving $\mathbf{z}_{p}$, the BS reconstructs the channel representation according to

In this process, the CSI representation subspace coincides with the CSI-RS precoder, i.e., $\mathbf{U}_{p}=\mathbf{C}_{p}$. The corresponding orthogonal projector is $\mathbf{P}_{p}=\mathbf{C}_{p}\mathbf{C}_{p}^{H}$. The beamforming vector is then obtained by applying MRT to the reconstructed channel as

In this way, the proposed scheme remains compatible with the existing feedback pipeline while shifting both the high-dimensional dominant-subspace discovery task and the following coefficient retrieval burden from the UE to the BS through site-specific subspace inference.

The achievable rate of the proposed design is given by

Suppose that there exists an oracle $Q$-dimensional subspace $\mathcal{U}_{Q}^{\star}$ that captures the most channel energy among all $Q$-dimensional subspaces, i.e.,

The corresponding orthogonal projector is denoted by $\mathbf{P}_{Q}^{\star}$. Here, $\mathcal{U}_{Q}^{\star}$ is used only as an analytical benchmark, since such a subspace is practically inaccessible at the BS. For example, when $Q=1$, $\mathcal{U}_{Q}^{\star}=\mathrm{span}(\mathbf{h})$ is an oracle subspace, but the BS cannot infer $\mathbf{h}$ from the RSRP vector. Alternatively, this oracle subspace may be interpreted as the subspace that best aligns with the dominant propagation directions. In particular, the oracle subspace can be spanned by the array response vectors of the $Q$ strongest paths, i.e., $\mathcal{U}_{Q}^{\star}=\mathrm{span}([\mathbf{a}(u_{l})]_{l\in\mathcal{L}_{Q}^{\star}})$, where $\mathcal{L}_{Q}^{\star}$ denotes the set of indices of the $Q$ strongest paths. The captured channel energy is therefore given by

where

denotes the corresponding oracle path-capture factor. In this case, the top-$Q$ paths are fully captured by the oracle subspace without the grid mismatch induced by the DFT basis in Type-I/II. Note that this oracle subspace is determined by the specific application and is typically unavailable to the BS. It is used only for theoretical analysis.

The subspace-mismatch bound above motivates a task-oriented design criterion: the inferred subspace should preserve as large a fraction of the channel energy as possible for the channel distribution of the target site under a $Q$-dimensional subspace bottleneck. However, directly minimizing the oracle mismatch $\delta_{p}$ is not practical because the oracle projector is unavailable and can be non-unique. We therefore formulate the design in terms of CSI-capture efficiency, which directly measures the relative energy preserved by the inferred subspace.
The probing codebook $\mathbf{B}$ is coupled with this objective because the inferred subspace is computed only from the RSRP fingerprint $\mathbf{r}_{\mathbf{B}}$ generated during SSB probing. A generic oversampled DFT probing codebook provides uniform directional sounding, but it does not necessarily produce measurements that are most informative for dominant-subspace inference as analyzed and illustrated in [sim]. Conversely, the information-maximizing probing design in [sim] is not tailored to the subspace-capture objective considered here. Therefore, the probing stage and the BS-side inference mapping should be optimized as a single task-oriented module: the probing codebook should shape the RSRP fingerprint so that the inference mapping can recover a low-dimensional subspace with high CSI-capture efficiency.
Accordingly, for a given channel realization, the joint design of the probing codebook $\mathbf{B}$ and the inference mapping $\Psi(\cdot)$ can be formulated as the following optimization problem

where the inferred basis is assumed to have been orthogonalized before constructing the projector. However, seeking a probing codebook $\mathbf{B}$ and an inference mapping $\Psi(\cdot)$ such that the inferred subspace preserves the channel energy for every possible channel realization is overly stringent for the present low-dimensional probing design. In particular, when $Q<N_{t}$, satisfying the above condition for all $\mathbf{h}$ would require the probing measurement $\mathbf{r}_{\mathbf{B}}$ to identify, from low-overhead observations, a $Q$-dimensional subspace aligned with arbitrary directions in $\mathbb{C}^{N_{t}\times 1}$, which is in general impossible. Therefore, rather than pursuing universal optimality over the entire channel space, it is more practical and sufficient for the present problem to optimize the probing codebook and the inference mapping over the site-specific channel set induced by the target propagation environment:

where the expectation is taken over the site-specific channel distribution $p_{s}$.