I burned up almost the last of the shop fire wood today. Betsy came over and we each worked on a machine. She had a Kenmore (darn, she always gets the Kenmores!) and I pulled out a Montgomery Ward Free arm I have been itching to service for years. Yes, years. I bought this machine in 2012 at the same time that I bought a Singer 301 Long bed. I remember the day. Steven and I drove to Albany to fetch the 301. The seller brought out the Montgomery Ward too. I looked at it, saw that it was a free arm and brought it home.
Since then I have been wanting to get it on the bench. Instead I kept moving it around the shop. Someone built a very nice, custom, plywood case for it. The case weighs almost as much as the machine.
The machine is all metal, save the hand wheel and some of the knobs. The camstack is metal. It was kind of gummed up but a little bit of Tri Flow got it going.
The shuttle gears look miniature to me. At least compared to Kenmores
The extension table is solid and metal. It fits into the bed of the machine in three places. I think it is more secure that the extension tables on the Taiwanese made Kenmores of the late 70s.
Oh Boy. I love this machine. Twin Needle capability. Four stretch stitches, two decorative stitches, straight stitch and zig zag. You could even put the needle in left position if wanted. PLUS a very nice, functional built in button hole stitch. All of the stitches work beautifully. Comes with some attachments and the manual. Sweet Machine. I wonder who made Montgomery Ward machines? Janome?
UPDATE. 4/6/14
Betsy found this information on another blog. http://www.doubleveil.net/zssmp/wards.htm.
Yesterday I picked up the Kenmore to service for a customer. Actually I picked up two machines. The Kenmore and a Montgomery Ward Straight Stitch HA-1 Class 15. Unfortunately the wiring on the 15 is a MESS and I put it aside until we could talk to the owner. It is definitely worth fixing. It is a lovely machine.
The Kenmore is a 385. It isn't a clamshell but it isn't metal, either. It was pretty dirty, gummed up and reverse didn't work.
It is a class 15 machine too; a drop in bobbin. The bobbin case was loose in the race when Betsy opened up the machine. I have no idea how she got it working, but she managed to free up the reverse mechanism and we put it through every stitch. It sews pretty nicely, we have to admit. We figure the more experience we get with these kinds of machines, the better off we are. These machines will probably show up in our shop. We'd best know how to fix 'em.
Just the same I would hate to have to take this mechanism apart. This is the base of the free arm.
I don't really like the way the stitch selector works on this machine. It feels chintzy to me. But I must admit that the recommendations for stitch length, width and presser foot type are useful.
I admit that it made a decent stitch. For people who want a lot of bells and whistles, it is likely an ok machine, for the time being. Not for the long haul. Even my latest love, Ward, likely won't still be stitching in 2084. I betcha the 1938 Singer 201 will be. If the motor lasts that long. I don't see why it wouldn't.

















































